BILL ANALYSIS 1
SENATE NATURAL RESOURCES AND WILDLIFE BILL NO:AB 997
Senator Sheila Kuehl, Chair AUTHOR:Dickerson
VERSION:June 19, 2002
Original:February 23,
2001
FISCAL:Yes
URGENCY:No
CONSULTANT:Syrus Devers
HEARING DATE:June 25,
2002
SUBJECT: Streambed alteration
ISSUE: Should the Legislature exempt from oversight by
the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) routine or minor
maintenance on previously permitted stream diversions and
crossings?
SUMMARY: This bill exempts from DFG review "routine or
minor maintenance" on previously permitted stream diversion
and crossings, provided that the activities do not impair a
streambed or divert a stream.
BACKGROUND & EXISTING LAW: It is unlawful for any person
to alter or obstruct a streambed, or to use materials from
a streambed, if it will substantially injure fish and
wildlife in a designated river or stream unless DFG is
notified of the activity. Once DFG is notified, all of the
following occur:
1) After notice is received, DFG must respond within 30
days, or within a time mutually agreed to, with a
description of the fish or wildlife resources that may be
substantially injured by the activity, and a proposal to
protect the resource. DFG may decide an onsite inspection
is required before making any proposals. If DFG does not
respond in 30 days, the person may commence the activity.
2) The affected party then has 14 days to accept the
proposals or to request a meeting with the department,
which must occur within 7 days, in order to develop
measures that are mutually acceptable.
3) If mutual agreement cannot be reached, a three person
panel of arbitrators is appointed, one selected by DFG, one
by the party, and one by mutual agreement. If there's no
agreement as to the third arbitrator, a person is appointed
pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1281.6.
DFG may enter into long-term agreements (up to 5
years) to authorize any of activities that may impact a
designated streambed. These agreements are automatically
renewed unless DFG determines that conditions have
substantially changed.
Emergency repairs, conducted after the Governor has
declared a state of emergency, are exempted from DFG
review, as are emergency repairs to a state highway.
COMMENTS: Supporters of this bill argue that waiting for
DFG review of minor maintenance or routine repairs may
delay, and impose significant costs, on ranching and
farming activities.
Staff Note : The support and opposition received to date
relates almost entirely to language that was deleted from
the bill by the recent amendments. For this reason, those
listed in support and opposition may have changed, but they
continue to be listed until the committee is informed
otherwise since the subject of the bill remains the same.
SUPPORT:
Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors (sponsor)
California Cattlemen's Association
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California
Regional Council of Rural Counties
Duane Martin Livestock
Pace Civil, Inc.
Association of California Water Agencies
Orange County Water District
OPPOSED:
California District Attorneys Association
California Native Plant Society
Defenders of Wildlife
California Fish and Game Warden Supervisors and Management
Association