BILL ANALYSIS
Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
997 (Dickerson)
Hearing Date: 8/5/02 Amended: 6/19/02
Consultant: Miriam B. Ingenito Policy Vote:
NR&W 7-0
____________________________________________________________
___
BILL SUMMARY: AB 997 would exempt from Department of Fish
and Game (DFG) review "routine or minor maintenance" on
previously permitted stream diversions and crossings,
provided that the activities do not impair a streambed or
divert a stream.
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2002-03 2003-04
2004-05 Fund
Admin. & Enforcement Unknown costs, potentially in the hundreds
General
of thousands
annually.
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill may meet the criteria for
referral to the Suspense file.
DFG believes that AB 997 would increase workload because of
confusion as to the types of activities that are subject to
the Fish and Game Code Section 1603. According to DFG, AB
997 would result in unknown costs related (1) to additional
programmatic and legal staff to research previous permits
and to make determinations whether the proposed activity is
"routine or minor maintenance;" and (2) to additional
wardens to enforce the provisions of AB 997.
STAFF NOTES that according to DFG, the total number of
notifications received would not decrease as a result of
this bill because this section of the Fish and Game Code
does not apply to routine or minor maintenance if that
maintenance does not result in the impairment of the
streambed or diversion of a stream. Section 1603 requires
any person to notify DFG before commencing any activity
that will substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow
or substantially change the bed, channel, or bank of any
river, stream, or lake in the State, or use any material
from a streambed. (Section 1601 has a similar notification
requirement, except it applies to any diversion,
obstruction, or change, rather than to substantial ones
only.) Hence, if a person is going to undertake an
activity that will not impair a streambed (i.e., will not
substantially change the bed, channel, or bank) or divert a
stream (whether the activity is "routine and minor
maintenance" or something else), he or she would not need
to notify DFG under Section 1603.
STAFF NOTES that "routine or minor" maintenance is not
defined and that by defining this term in regulation or in
statute, the potential confusion that DFG fears may be
eliminated. Additionally, by clearly defining what is
included in routine or minor maintenance, DFG costs
incurred in determining whether the proposed activity
qualifies for this exemption may be reduced.