BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1193|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1193
          Author:   Steinberg (D), et al
          Amended:  6/13/01 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE  :  4-1, 6/20/01
          AYES: Speier, Figueroa, Scott, Soto
          NOES: Oller

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  71-0, 5/29/01 -  See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Insurers:  hate crimes:  cancellation

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill prohibits insurers from canceling or  
          refusing to renew a policy held by a religious or  
          educational organization or other nonprofit solely on the  
          basis that the policyholder has filed one or more claims  
          for damage resulting from a hate crime.

           ANALYSIS  :    This bill: 

          1.Prohibits insurers from canceling or refusing to renew a  
            policy solely on the basis that one or more claims has  
            been made as a result of a hate crime committed against  
            the person or property of the insured during the  
            preceding five years if the insured is a religious or  
            educational organization or other nonprofit organization  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1193
                                                                Page  
          2

            organized and operated for religious, charitable, or  
            educational purposes.
           
          2.Provides that whether an act constitutes a hate crime is  
            determined by a law enforcement officer or agency.
           
          3.Defines "hate crime" to include any of the following:
           
             A.   By force or threat of force, willfully injure,  
               intimidate, interfere with, oppress, or threaten any  
               other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any  
               right or privilege secured to him or her by the  
               Constitution or laws of this State, or by the  
               Constitution or laws of the United States, because of  
               the other person's race, color, religion, ancestry,  
               national origin, disability, gender, or  sexual  
               orientation, or because he or she perceives that the  
               other person has one or more of those characteristics.  
                However, the foregoing offense does not include  
               speech alone, except upon a showing that the speech  
               itself threatened violence against a specific person  
               or group of persons and that the defendant had the  
               apparent ability to carry out the threat.
              
             B.   Knowingly, deface, damage, or destroy the real or  
               personal property of any other person for the purpose  
               of intimidating or interfering with the free exercise  
               or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to the  
               other person by the Constitution or laws of this  
               State, or by the Constitution or laws of the United  
               States, because of the other person's race, color,  
               religion, ancestry, national origin, disability,  
               gender, or sexual orientation, or because he or she  
               perceives that the other person has one or more of  
               those characteristics.

          4.Requires insurers to report to the Insurance Commissioner  
            the cancellation or non-renewal of a policy after an  
            insured has submitted a claim resulting from a hate  
            crime.
           
          5.Clarifies that insurers are not precluded from canceling  
            or refusing to renew a policy based on valid, lawful  
            criteria.







                                                               AB 1193
                                                                Page  
          3

           
          6.Provides that canceling or refusing to renew a policy of  
            a place of worship or a nonprofit entity organized for  
            religious, charitable, educational, or health purposes  
            solely on the basis that one or more claims has been made  
            as a result of a hate crime committed against the person  
            or property of the insured during the preceding five  
            years constitutes an unfair method of competition and an  
            unfair and deceptive act or practice in the business of  
            insurance.
           
          Existing law 1) imposes limitations on insurers relative to  
          cancellation or non-renewal of policies protecting against  
          certain residential, liability, and commercial risks,  
          including policies held by victims of domestic violence;  
          and 2) provides that certain actions constitute unfair  
          methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts or  
          practices in the business of insurance, and specifies  
          certain penalties and powers of the Insurance Commissioner  
          relative to these actions.

           FISCAL EFFECT :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/9/01)

          Consumer Attorneys of California
          California Alliance for Pride and Equality
          California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
          Personal Insurance Federation
          Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California
          Protection and Advocacy, Inc.
          Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
          State Department of Insurance
          Lambda letters
           
           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :   The author points to a June 1999  
          arson attack at Temple B'Nai Israel, Sacramento, that  
          gutted a library, Temple offices and a sanctuary.  Two  
          other area synagogues were also struck that night by the  
          arsonists who were eventually arrested and charged with  
          murdering a gay couple in Redding.  The FBI later  
          determined that B'Nai Israel was the victim of a hate  
          crime.  B'Nai Israel's renewed its insurance policy 11 days  







                                                               AB 1193
                                                                Page  
          4

          after the attack.  But in May 2000, shortly prior to the  
          annual renewal date, the carrier informed Temple officials  
          that it would not renew the policy for "underwriting  
          reasons".  The insurer broke the arson attack into multiple  
          claims and, as such, premiums were increased to reflect  
          multiple claims that led to underwriting difficulties.   
          Several carriers contracted by Temple officials declined to  
          offer coverage based on the claim history, according to the  
          author.  The author also states that in 1999, hate crimes  
          were linked to 1,329 incidents of violence and 633 property  
          losses in California.

          The Personal Insurance Federation of California (PIFC)  
          supports the bill, noting that it is not aware of any  
          insurer that currently makes it a practice to violate the  
          intent of this bill.  While PIFC expresses concern about  
          government restrictions on the underwriting judgment, it  
          considers the firebomb attack on B'nai Israel "one of the  
          most heinous acts" in Sacramento history, and, therefore,  
          it views this bill as part of the community healing  
          process. 

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Aroner, Ashburn, Bogh, Calderon,  
            John Campbell, Canciamilla, Cardenas, Cardoza, Cedillo,  
            Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Correa, Cox, Daucher, Diaz,  
            Dickerson, Dutra, Firebaugh, Frommer, Goldberg, Harman,  
            Havice, Horton, Jackson, Keeley, Kehoe, Kelley, Koretz,  
            La Suer, Leach, Leonard, Leslie, Liu, Longville,  
            Lowenthal, Maddox, Maldonado, Matthews, Migden, Mountjoy,  
            Nakano, Nation, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Robert Pacheco,  
            Rod Pacheco, Papan, Pavley, Pescetti, Reyes, Richman,  
            Runner, Salinas, Shelley, Simitian, Steinberg,  
            Strom-Martin, Thomson, Vargas, Washington, Wayne, Wesson,  
            Wiggins, Wright, Wyland, Wyman, Zettel


          DLW:kb  7/10/01   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****