BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                   
         AB 1193
                                                                Page  1

        CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
        AB 1193 (Steinberg)
        As Amended June 13, 2001
        Majority vote
         
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |ASSEMBLY:  |71-0 |(May 29, 2001)  |SENATE: |28-2 |(July 19,      |
        |           |     |                |        |     |2001)          |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          
         Original Committee Reference:    INS.  

         SUMMARY  :  Prohibits insurers from canceling or refusing to renew a  
        policy of a religious or educational organization or other nonprofit  
        organization organized and operated for religious, charitable, or  
        educational purposes solely on the basis that one or more claims has  
        been made as a result of a hate crime committed against the person  
        or property of the insured during the preceding five years.  

         The Senate amendments  :

        1)Specify that this bill applies to insurance policies of religious  
          organizations, educational organizations, or other nonprofit  
          organizations, as defined by federal tax rules that are organized  
          and operated for religious, charitable, or educational purposes.

        2)List, but do not limit, those acts that may be determined by law  
          enforcement to be a hate crime. 

        3)Delete the requirement that upon cancellation or nonrenewal of a  
          policy after an insured has submitted a claim that is the result  
          of a hate crime the insurer must provide the Insurance  
          Commissioner (IC) with any related information required by the IC  
          pursuant to regulations adopted by the IC.

         EXISTING LAW  :

        1)Imposes limitations on insurers relative to cancellation or  
          non-renewal of policies protecting against certain residential,  
          liability, and commercial risks, including policies held by  
          victims of domestic violence. 

        2)Provides that certain actions constitute unfair methods of  
          competition and unfair and deceptive acts or practices in the  








                                                                   
         AB 1193
                                                                Page  2

          business of insurance, and specifies certain penalties and powers  
          of the IC relative to these actions. 

         AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill prohibited insurers from  
        canceling or refusing to renew a policy of a place of worship or  
        nonprofit organization solely on the basis that the policyholder has  
        filed one or more claims for damage resulting from a hate crime.   
        Specifically,  this bill  :  

        1)Prohibited insurers from canceling or refusing to renew a policy  
          of a church, synagogue, temple, or other place of worship, or a  
          nonprofit entity organized for religious, charitable, educational,  
          or health purposes solely on the basis that one or more claims has  
          been made as a result of a hate crime committed against the person  
          or property of the insured during the preceding five years.  

        2)Provided that whether an act constitutes a hate crime is  
          determined by a law enforcement officer or agency.

        3)Defined "hate crime" to include any of the following: 

           a)   By force or threat of force, willfully injure, intimidate,  
             interfere with, oppress, or threaten any other person in the  
             free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to  
             him or her by the Constitution or laws of this state, or by the  
             Constitution or laws of the United States, because of the other  
             person's race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin,  
             disability, gender, or sexual orientation, or because he or she  
             perceives that the other person has one or more of those  
             characteristics.  However, the foregoing offense does not  
             include speech alone, except upon a showing that the speech  
             itself threatened violence against a specific person or group  
             of persons and that the defendant had the apparent ability to  
             carry out the threat; and,  

           b)   Knowingly, deface, damage, or destroy the real or personal  
             property of any other person for the purpose of intimidating or  
             interfering with the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or  
             privilege secured to the other person by the Constitution or  
             laws of this state, or by the Constitution or laws of the  
             United States, because of the other person's race, color,  
             religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, gender, or  
             sexual orientation, or because he or she perceives that the  
             other person has one or more of those characteristics.








                                                                   
         AB 1193
                                                                Page  3


        1)Required insurers to report to the IC the cancellation or  
          non-renewal of a policy after an insured has submitted a claim  
          resulting from a hate crime.  Required insurers to provide the IC  
          with any related information required by the IC pursuant to  
          regulations adopted by the IC.  

        2)Clarified that insurers are not precluded from canceling or  
          refusing to renew a policy based on valid, lawful criteria.  

        3)Provided that canceling or refusing to renew a policy of a place  
          of worship or a nonprofit entity organized for religious,  
          charitable, educational, or health purposes solely on the basis  
          that one or more claims has been made as a result of a hate crime  
          committed against the person or property of the insured during the  
          preceding five years constitutes an unfair method of competition  
          and an unfair and deceptive act or practice in the business of  
          insurance.  

         FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee,  
        minor, absorbable costs. 

         COMMENTS  :  The Senate amendments clarify which entities are covered  
        by this bill by referencing a specific section of the United State  
        Code dealing with the federal tax rules relating to charitable  
        contributions.  In addition, the Senate amendments broaden the  
        definition of "hate crime" by listing, rather than limiting, the  
        acts that may constitute hate crimes.  The Senate amendments also  
        delete the provision that the IC adopt regulations to implement this  
        bill and remove the requirement that insurers, who cancel or  
        nonrenew policies after a hate crime, must provide the IC with  
        additional information required by the IC pursuant to those  
        regulations.  Lastly, the Senate amendments make technical,  
        non-substantive changes.   
         

        Analysis Prepared by  :  M. Christine Iway / INS. / (916) 319-2086 

                                                          FN: 0001849