BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 398
                                                                  Page  1

          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 398 (Mullin)
          As Amended April 24, 2003
          Majority vote 

           PUBLIC EMPLOYEES    9-0                                         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Negrete McLeod, Levine,   |     |                          |
          |     |Chan, Correa, Kehoe,      |     |                          |
          |     |Laird, Maldonado,         |     |                          |
          |     |Nakanishi, Spitzer        |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the Board of Supervisors (Board) of San  
          Mateo County (County), by resolution, ordinance, contract or  
          contract amendment, to provide retirement benefits for some, but  
          not all, general members or safety members of that county.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Specifies that the Board may provide a different formula for  
            calculation of retirement benefits for any subgroup of members  
            within a classification, including bargaining units or  
            unrepresented groups.

          2)Requires that these provisions would not be operative until  
            adoption by the Board. 

          3)Eliminates a provision requiring that re-employment occur  
            within two years of termination and would also make technical,  
            nonsubstantive changes to that provision.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Authorizes counties to provide retirement benefits to general  
            members and safety members of a county.

          2)Establishes an alternative retirement plan for the County  
            known as Retirement Plan 3.  

          3)Provides that a member who has elected or transferred to Plan  
            3 and is terminated but is later re-employed will receive  
            credit for service rendered prior to termination, if the  
            reemployment occurs within two years of termination.








                                                                  AB 398
                                                                  Page  2


           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  As part of its recently completed and ratified labor  
          negotiations, the Board agreed to sponsor legislation to  
          effectuate four provisions:

          1)Bridge service credit for employees who return to County  
            employment:  Employees who enter County service may elect to  
            enroll in the regular "contributory" retirement plan, or  
            enroll in the "non-contributory" Plan 3 in which there is no  
            employee contribution.  Many employees enroll in Plan 3  
            because they do not plan on retiring from County employment  
            and want to maximize take home pay.  At a later date, many  
            employees wish to change to the contributory plan.  Employees  
            may move from Plan 3 to the contributory plan after they have  
            five years of County service.


          Currently, if an employee enrolls in Plan 3, resigns from County  
            employment and later is re-employed with the County, he/she  
            must again be covered under Plan 3 and  must  start a new 5-year  
            waiting period, unless the period of time between the  
            separation and re-employment is two years or less.  If the gap  
            is two years or less, he/she can count the prior Plan 3 time  
            toward the 5-year waiting period.  In order to enhance our  
            ability to recruit former employees back into County service,  
            we wish to eliminate the two-year limitation and allow prior  
            Plan 3 service to count toward the 5-year waiting period  
            regardless of whether the employee is rehired within two years  
            of their separation date.  Agreement was reached with employee  
            organizations in negotiations to jointly support this proposed  
            legislation. 

          2)Allow negotiated retirement enhancements to be implemented by  
            individual bargaining units:  The County has reached agreement  
            with two of the three safety unions and three of the seven  
            non-safety unions on enhanced retirement benefits.   
            Negotiations are under way with the other unions regarding the  
            same enhancements.  Currently, if a retirement enhancement is  
            implemented, it must be implemented for all bargaining units  
            in the same category (safety or non-safety).  Although the  
            County hopes to reach agreement with the other unions, it may  
            not be able to do so.









                                                                  AB 398
                                                                  Page  3

          Agreement was reached with the American Federation of State,  
            County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Service Employees  
            International Union (SEIU), the Building and Construction  
            Trades Council (BCTC), the Organization of Sheriff's Sergeants  
            (OSS) and the Probation and Detention Association (PDA) to  
            jointly support this proposed legislation. BCTC is affiliated  
            with Operating Engineers Local 3 (OE3) and the PDA is  
            affiliated with Teamsters Local 856.  The County's Deputy  
            Sheriff's Association (DSA) is currently voting on the  
            County's offer.

          3)Change the employee cost basis from 1/240 to 1/120:  In  
            negotiations that concluded this past November, three  
            non-safety unions proposed implementation of the 2%@55.5  
            retirement enhancement.  The County agreed to implement this  
            benefit in March 2005, contingent on legislation that would  
            change the employee contribution basis from the current 1/240  
            formula to a 1/120 formula.

          Both the current 2%@61.25 benefit and the 2%@55 benefit have an  
            employee contribution basis formula of 1/120.  The 2%@55.5  
            benefit, which is a richer and more costly benefit than either  
            2%@61.25 or 2%@55 has a 1/240 formula for employee  
            contributions.  This means that employees make much lower  
            contributions for the richer benefit and the County makes much  
            higher contributions.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Clem Meredith / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916)  
          319-3957 




                                                                FN: 0000817