BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 529|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 529
          Author:   Mullin (D)
          Amended:  7/23/03 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HEALTH & HUMAN SERV. COMMITTEE  :  8-2, 6/25/03
          AYES:  Ortiz, Aanestad, Alarcon, Ashburn, Battin, Escutia,  
            Kuehl, Vincent
          NOES:  Chesbro, Figueroa
          ABSENT/NO VOTE RECORDED:  Florez, Romero, Vasconcellos

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  74-0, 5/8/03 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Family day care homes

           SOURCE  :     Child Care Coordinating Council of San Mateo


           DIGEST  :    This bill treats one child attending  
          kindergarten the same as a child of six years of age or  
          older for purposes of allowing additional children to be  
          cared for by licensed family day care homes.

           Senate floor amendments  of 7/23/03 delete the provision  
          allowing family day care providers (who care for children  
          in the provider's home) to add an additional  
          kindergarten-aged child beyond licensed capacity limits, as  
          long as the child's family is given a price break if the  
          child is in care six or fewer hours per day.  The State  
          Department of Social Services objects to this language  
          because it would involve them for the first time in  
          checking a provider's rates and might prove impossible to  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 529
                                                                Page  
          2

          enforce.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:

          1. Provides for the licensure of family day care homes --  
             that is, a home in which the child care provider lives  
             -- and limits the number of children for whom family day  
             care providers can provide care.  (In December, 2002,  
             there were 46,000 licensed family child care homes in  
             California.)

          2. Provides for two kinds of family day care home licenses:  
              "small," which is limited to six children in care at  
             any one time, and "large," which is limited to 12  
             children in care at any one time.

          3. Allows care for two additional children, if the children  
             are six years of age or older -- as long as the licensee  
             notifies each parent that the facility is caring for  
             additional children and that there may be up to eight  
             children (or up to 14 children) in the home at one time,  
             and as long as the licensee obtains the written consent  
             of the property owner when the family day care home is  
             operated on property that is leased or rented.

          4. Limits to two the number of infants who can be cared for  
             by small family day care providers, and to three the  
             number of infants who can be cared for by large family  
             day providers, when one or two additional children six  
             years of age or older are in care.

          This bill permits a child attending kindergarten or  
          elementary school to be one of the two additional children  
          allowed to be in care above the licensed capacities of  
          small and large family day care homes.

           Background
           
          In 1989, to address the shortage of care for school-aged  
          children and to reduce the number of children who might be  
          "latchkey" children - children caring for themselves before  
          and after school, the Legislature established a pilot  
          program in Placer and Ventura counties to test the  
          feasibility of increasing the maximum enrollment of  







                                                                AB 529
                                                                Page  
          3

          children in licensed family day care homes.  The licensed  
          capacity of a family day care home, since the early years  
          of licensing, had been six children (or 12, if the child  
          care provider had an assistant present and met additional  
          health and safety requirements).

          Under the pilot program, which operated through 1995 and  
          later included San Diego, San Luis Obispo, and Fresno  
          counties, licensed providers were allowed to add two  
          additional school-aged children, defined as being at least  
          six years of age.

          Legislation required an evaluation conducted by the  
          Assembly Office of Research and the Department of Social  
          Services.  The report, published in March 1995, "Findings  
          of the Family Day Care Evaluation Required by AB 265  
          (Chapter 425, Statutes of 1993)," included a study of  
          program quality before and after the enrollment of  
          additional children six-years-of-age and older.  

          The evaluation's conclusions included:

          1. Participating providers with additional children were no  
             more likely to receive substantiated complaints from  
             licensing officials than nonparticipants.

          2. One measure of provider quality - provider sensitivity  
             to individual children - dropped after additional older  
             children were added.  

          3. The experience of younger children was less positive,  
             and older children more positive, after family day care  
             homes increased the number of children in their care.

          After the report was released, the Legislature enacted  
          Chapter 18, Statutes of 1996 (SB 265, O'Connell), allowing  
          the addition of up to two additional children, at least six  
          years of age, in licensed family day care homes statewide.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/23/03)








                                                                AB 529
                                                                Page  
          4

          Child Care Coordinating Council of San Mateo (source)
          San Diego County Family Child Care Association
          200 individuals

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  7/23/03)

          California Child Care Resource and Referral Network
          Child Care Law Center

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office states that  
          current law treats kindergartners under age six as if they  
          required full-time care, even though they attend school  
          part of each school day.  These children may demand less  
          time and attention.  The author's office notes that some  
          children turn six while they are in kindergarten, at which  
          time they could be counted toward the additional two  
          enrollees even though there is no difference in the length  
          of their day in care before their sixth birthday.

          The author's office also points out that allowing a  
          kindergarten child who is not yet six years of age to  
          receive care from a family child care home as an "extra"  
          child makes it more likely that family day care providers  
          will take advantage of the option to enroll one or two  
          children attending school.  Over time, this will increase  
          the number of school-aged children served.  

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The Child Care Law Center  
          argues that current ratio and age requirements protect  
          children and promote quality.  Children six years of age  
          and older have a higher level of maturity and spend more  
          hours in school each day than do kindergarten children.  It  
          is important to make certain that at least two of those  
          eight children in care have the level of independence found  
          in children six years or older.

          The California Child Care Resource and Referral Network  
          asserts that the bill compromises quality while not  
          addressing the existing barriers to school-age care,  
          including transportation.  This bill would allow for the  
          care of additional children as young as four years, nine  
          months of age.  A family day care provider could care for  
          two infants under the age of two, four preschool age  
          children, and two kindergarten children younger than five  







                                                                AB 529
                                                                Page  
          5

          years of age.  Kindergarten children need more supervision  
          and support.  
           
           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Bates, Benoit, Berg, Bermudez, Bogh,  
            Calderon, Chan, Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Corbett,  
            Correa, Cox, Daucher, Diaz, Dutra, Dutton, Dymally,  
            Firebaugh, Frommer, Garcia, Goldberg, Hancock, Harman,  
            Jerome Horton, Shirley Horton, Jackson, Keene, Kehoe,  
            Koretz, La Malfa, La Suer, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber,  
            Liu, Longville, Lowenthal, Maldonado, Matthews, Maze,  
            McCarthy, Montanez, Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi, Nakano,  
            Nation, Negrete McLeod, Nunez, Oropeza, Pacheco, Parra,  
            Pavley, Plescia, Reyes, Richman, Ridley-Thomas, Runner,  
            Salinas, Samuelian, Simitian, Spitzer, Steinberg,  
            Strickland, Vargas, Wiggins, Wolk, Wyland, Yee, Wesson


          CP:sl  7/24/03   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****