BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1852|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1852
          Author:   Mullin (D)
          Amended:  8/23/04 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC EMP. & RET. COMMITTEE  :  3-2, 6/14/04
          AYES:  Soto, Escutia, Karnette
          NOES:  Ashburn, Oller

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  12-0, 8/12/04
          AYES:  Alpert, Battin, Aanestad, Ashburn, Bowen, Escutia,  
            Johnson, Karnette, Machado, Murray, Poochigian, Speier
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Burton

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  70-6, 5/25/04 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    State teachers retirement

           SOURCE  :     California Teachers Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill eliminates the minimum age requirement  
          for qualified members of the State Teachers Retirement  
          System (STRS) to receive an earned longevity bonus as a  
          lump sum payment.  Appropriates $53,000 from the Teachers'  
          Retirement fund for administrative expenses.  The bill also  
          reduced the reemployment restrictions that apply to members  
          of the STRS Defined Benefit Program who retire under either  
          of two early retirement incentive programs.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/23/04:

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1852
                                                                Page  
          2

          1.Eliminate the one-year prohibition on employment with any  
            California public school employer for K-12 members who  
            receive an additional retirement benefit under the STRS  
            Retirement Incentive Program.

          2.Incorporate into this bill the provisions of AB 2753  
            (Corbett),which failed passage in the Senate  
            Appropriations Committee recently, but with changes in  
            the AB 2753 required by Senator Battin.

           ANALYSIS  :    
           
          Expansion of Eligibility for Lump Sum Payment of the STRS  
          "Longevity Bonuses."

           Existing STRS law (1) provides most STRs members with a  
          "longevity bonus" ($200, $300 or $400 per month for  
          teaching to 30, 31, or 32 years, respectively) added to  
          their monthly STRS allowance, and (2) authorizes these STRS  
          members who are 60 years and three months old at the time  
          of retirement to receive a specified lump-sump payment upon  
          retirement and an actuarially reduced monthly allowance if  
          they retire before July 1, 2011.

          This bill removes the age 60 years and three months age  
          requirement for choosing the lump-sum payment option and  
          authorizes most STRS members who retire with 30 or more  
          years of service, in lieu of a monthly "longevity bonus,"  
          to receive a lump-sump payment at retirement of the lesser  
          of the actuarial value of the "longevity bonus" or 15  
          percent of the actuarial value of the benefit.

          AB 1207 (Corbett), Chapter 313, Statutes of 2003,  
          re-authorized a golden handshake program that provides an  
          additional two years of service credit for teachers.  That  
          bill also authorized a two plus two program.  AB1207  
          provided limitations on teachers who take the early  
          retirement incentive and later return to work, but the  
          language was not consistent between those in K-12  
          districts, and the County Office of Education or Community  
          College districts.  It provided that teachers were not  
          allowed to return to work in the same district that they  
          retired from for five years, and were not allowed to work  
          for another district for one year without forgoing the  







                                                               AB 1852
                                                                Page  
          3

          increase in their benefit.  However, teachers who retired  
          from a county office of education or community college  
          district did not have any restrictions placed on them for  
          returning to work.  Districts claim that the inconsistent,  
          strict limitations preclude them from hiring qualified  
          retirees in emergency situations.

          The bill reduces the five-year limitation to one-year for  
          teachers who retire with the golden handshake and return to  
          work in the same school district, community college  
          district, or county office of education.  It eliminates the  
          one-year restriction on teachers that go back to work, but  
          in another district.  And, it places a one-year restriction  
          on those who retire from a school district, county office  
          of education or community college district and return to  
          the same.

          Existing law places an earnings limitation on teachers who  
          retire.  Currently, teachers who retire can earn up to  
          $25,740 annually before having their retirement benefit  
          decreased dollar for dollar.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions             2004-05             2005-06          
              2006-07             Fund

           Admin costs                     $53*                  $0     
                           $0                 TRF

          *Appropriated in bill.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/12/04)

          California Teachers Association (source)
          California Federation of Teachers
          Faculty Association of California Community Colleges


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Bates, Berg, Bermudez, Bogh, Calderon,  







                                                               AB 1852
                                                                Page  
          4

            Campbell, Canciamilla, Chan, Chavez, Chu, Cohn, Corbett,  
            Correa, Cox, Daucher, Diaz, Dutra, Dutton, Dymally,  
            Firebaugh, Frommer, Goldberg, Hancock, Jerome Horton,  
            Shirley Horton, Jackson, Keene, Kehoe, Koretz, La Malfa,  
            Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Liu, Longville, Lowenthal,  
            Maddox, Maldonado, Matthews, McCarthy, Montanez,  
            Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi, Nakano, Nation, Negrete  
            McLeod, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Plescia, Reyes, Richman,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Runner, Salinas, Samuelian, Simitian,  
            Spitzer, Steinberg, Strickland, Vargas, Wesson, Wiggins,  
            Wolk, Wyland, Yee, Nunez
          NOES:  Garcia, Harman, Haynes, Houston, La Suer, Maze
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Benoit, Cogdill, Leslie, Pacheco


          TSM:cm  8/22/04  Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****