BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1960
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 5, 2204

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                   Judy Chu, Chair

                   AB 1960 (Pavley) - As Amended:  April 22, 2004 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:13-5
                        Business and Professions                8-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) to register  
          with the Board of Pharmacy (Board), requires the Board to set  
          specified standards for registration, and requires PBMs to make  
          specified disclosures to purchasers and prospective purchasers  
          with regard to drug rebates, revenues and its drug formularies,  
          and to make specified disclosures to the public upon request.   
          Additionally, this bill would establish requirements regarding  
          PBM contracts and the provision of certain drugs.  Specifically,  
          this bill:

          1)Prohibits a person from engaging in pharmacy benefits  
            management unless the person registers with the Board, and  
            broadly defines the phrase "pharmaceutical benefit  
            management."

          2)Requires contracts entered into by PBMs to disclose various  
            things, including the amount of total revenues, rebates, and  
            discounts passed on to the purchaser, the disclosure or sale  
            of enrollee utilization data, any administrative or other fees  
            charged, bulk purchase arrangements, the process for  
            development of formularies and notification of changes to  
            formularies.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Costs to the Board of Pharmacy of approximately $240,000  
            annually.  These costs would ultimately be borne by licensing  
            fees paid by PBMs following the adoption of regulations by the  
            Board establishing the amount of the licensing fee.









                                                                  AB 1960
                                                                  Page  2

          2)Unknown state GF costs or savings, depending upon whether  
            disclosure requirements lead to higher or lower prescription  
            drug prices.  The state currently contracts with two PBMs (for  
            the AIDS Drug Assistance Program and for CalPERS enrollees in  
            two self-funded plans).

          3)Indeterminate costs to state-contracting PBMs by prohibiting a  
            PMB from limiting or excluding coverage for a drug for an  
            enrollee if the drug previously had been approved for coverage  
            by the PBM for a medical condition of a patient.

           SUMMARY CONTINUED
           
          1)Requires a PBM to disclose to members of the public upon  
            request the most current list of prescription drugs on the  
            formulary by major therapeutic category, with an indication of  
            whether any drugs on the list are preferred over other listed  
            drugs, the membership of any pharmaceutical and therapeutic  
            committee members' (P&TC) credentials, and any financial  
            relationships between committee members and drug  
            manufacturers. 

          2)Requires a PBM to disclose to the purchaser or prospective  
            purchaser in writing all of the following: 

             a)   The aggregate amount, and for a specified list of drugs,  
               the specific amount, of all rebates and other retrospective  
               utilization discounts received by the PBM from each  
               pharmaceutical manufacturer earned in connection with  
               prescription drug benefits managed by the PBM related to  
               the purchaser or prospective purchaser;
             b)   The nature, type, and amount of all other revenue  
               received by the PBM from each pharmaceutical manufacturer  
               related to the purchaser or prospective purchaser;
             c)   Any prescription drug utilization information related to  
               utilization by the purchaser's enrollees or aggregate  
               utilization data that is not specific to an individual  
               consumer, prescriber, or purchaser;
             d)   Records developed by the P&TC of the plan, or by others  
               responsible for developing, modifying, and overseeing  
               formularies, including medical groups and contracting PBM  
               companies, used to guide the drugs prescribed for the  
               enrollees of the plan, that fully describe the reasoning  
               behind formulary decisions;
             e)   Any arrangements with prescribing providers, medical  








                                                                  AB 1960
                                                                  Page  3

               groups, pharmacists, or other entities associated with  
               activities of the PBM to encourage formulary compliance. 

          3)Requires PBMs to provide for continuity of prescription drug  
            coverage and an expeditious process for prescribing providers  
            to obtain authorization for medically necessary nonformulary  
            prescription drugs.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  This bill is jointly sponsored by the California  
            Labor Federation and the California Alliance for Retired  
            Americans.  Supporters argue that in the absence of  
            regulation, it is unclear whose interest PBMs represent.   
            Additionally, supporters point out that some PBMs already  
            provide full disclosure to clients and are able to maintain  
            competitive prices without drastic increases in drug prices  
            and while securing rebates from manufacturers. 

          According to the author, this bill is needed to create consumer  
            protection guidelines that PBMs must meet when doing business  
            with California clients such as CalPERS, large employers,  
            health plans, and union trust funds.  The author states that  
            there are two main deficiencies in current law, the first  
            being a drug industry with a lack of objective prescription  
            drug pricing information that creates an incentive system that  
            can cause PBMs to favor the interests of pharmaceutical  
            companies over clients.  The second deficiency identified is  
            the lack of consumer/client protection regarding disclosure  
            related to PBMs.  

          The author believes that creating a more transparent market will  
            shine a light on an industry that discloses an inadequate  
            amount of pricing and conflict of interest information, which  
            will enable clients to make informed decisions about the type  
            of prescriptions and benefits they select on behalf of their  
            enrollees.  According to the author, this will allow clients  
            to take full advantage of the free market by incentivizing  
            PBMs to compete in a fair, transparent environment for  
            California business.  

          Finally, the author's office and sponsors believe this bill will  
            help address the issue of rising prescription drug prices. 

           2)Background  .  PBMs are independent specialty administrators  








                                                                  AB 1960
                                                                  Page  4

            that administer pharmacy benefits for health plans, unions and  
            employers, which can include the managing, purchasing,  
            dispensing, and reimbursing of prescription drugs.  PBMs offer  
            a variety of services including negotiating price discounts  
            with retail pharmacies, negotiating rebates with  
            manufacturers, and operating mail-order prescription services  
            and administrative claims processing systems.  PBMs also offer  
            clinical services, such as formulary development and  
            management, prior authorization and drug utilization reviews  
            to screen prescriptions for such issues as adverse  
            interactions or therapy duplication, and substitution of  
            generic drugs for therapeutically equivalent brand-name drugs.  
             

          CalPERS currently contracts with a PBM to manage its  
            prescription drug benefit to enrollees in its self-funded  
            plans (PERSCare and PERS Choice) and DHS contracts with  
            Ramsell Corporation to administer the drug benefit provided in  
            the AIDS Drug Assistance Program.

           3)Opposition  .  This bill is opposed by health plans and PBMs,  
            which argue there is no need for this bill, and that it will  
            significantly harm the ability of PBMs to seek the lowest  
            price for drugs.  Opponents believe that providing information  
            to negotiators and competitors impairs competition and results  
            in higher prices for consumers.  Opponents claim that drug  
            manufacturers will not agree to substantial price discounts if  
            they know that information may be publicly available to other  
            purchasers and their competitors, and cite a Congressional  
            Budget Office analysis of federal legislation which stated  
            that disclosure requirements will lead to higher prices on  
            prescription drugs.  Additionally, opponents are opposed to  
            this bill's provision requiring disclosure of the names of the  
            P&T committees, arguing that disclosing the names of these  
            members to the public would open them up to intense lobbying  
            by drug manufacturers and others seeking to add or replace  
            drugs on the formulary.  

          The Board of Pharmacy also writes in opposition that it convened  
            a task force on the need to license and regulate PBMs, and  
            that it could not identify specific consumer harm that  
            resulted from PBM activities.  The Board requests amendments  
            to instead establish a fiduciary relationship between a PBM  
            and its client, which would not be enforced by the Board.









                                                                  AB 1960
                                                                  Page  5






           Analysis Prepared by  :    Scott Bain / APPR. / (916) 319-2081