BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2146|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2146
          Author:   Leno (D)
          Amended:  6/16/04 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE NATURAL RES. & WILD. COMMITTEE  :  6-3, 6/22/04
          AYES:  Kuehl, Alpert, Bowen, Ortiz, Sher, Torlakson
          NOES:  Oller, Denham, Hollingsworth

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-4, 8/12/04
          AYES:  Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Karnette, Machado, Murray,  
            Speier
          NOES:  Battin, Aanestad, Ashburn, Poochigian
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Escutia, Johnson
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  47-30, 5/25/04 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Dungeness crab

           SOURCE  :     Crab Boat Owners Association, Inc.


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes, but does not require, the  
          Fish and Game Commission to adopt regulations to ensure the  
          protection of the Dungeness crab resource and to establish  
          an advisory council, establishes a trap limitation in  
          District 10 and south of District 10 of 250 traps per  
          vessel, and makes violation of that limitation a  
          misdemeanor. 

           ANALYSIS  :    The Fish and Game Code regulates this  
          commercial resource with restrictions on the number and  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2146
                                                                Page  
          2

          types of vessels that may take crab, limits on the season,  
          and limits on the type of gear that may be used to take  
          crab.  This is a closed fishery, meaning that new entrants  
          must purchase an existing license. 

          Currently, south of Mendocino County, the season opens on  
          November 15. North of Mendocino County, the season opens on  
          December 1. 
          
          This bill authorizes, but does not require, the Fish and  
          Game Commission (Commission) to adopt regulations to ensure  
          the protection of the Dungeness crab resource in California  
          waters north of San Francisco, and to establish an advisory  
          council of five members who represent the geographic range  
          of the fishery and whose names are submitted by  
          representatives of organizations that represent Dungeness  
          crab fishermen. 

          The bill contains numerous findings concerning the need to  
          take precautionary measures that establish the  
          sustainability of the resource.  To that end, the bill  
          imposes a limit of 250 crab traps per season for each  
          licensed vessel from Fish and Game District 10 southward to  
          the southernmost reach of the fishery.  District 10 ranges  
          from the Sonoma-Mendocino line to the northern boundary of  
          San Mateo County.  South of District 10 are districts 17  
          (Santa Cruz and northern Monterey), District 18 (the  
          remainder of Monterey, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara  
          counties), and District 19 (Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange,  
          and San Diego).

          The bill also prohibits an owner of a vessel with a permit  
          from using that permit on another vessel owned by another  
          person. 

          The bill requires the Commission, on or after March 15,  
          2007, but not later than August 30, 2007, to consider  
          recommendations from the State Department of Fish and Game  
          (DFG) and Dungeness crab vessel permit holders, based on  
          the experience of operating with a 250-trap limit, on  
          whether to take any of the following actions:  (1) extend  
          the operation of the 250-trap limit beyond June 30, 2007,  
          (2) increase or decrease the trap limit, and (3) make any  
          other modifications of the operation of the 250-trap limit.







                                                               AB 2146
                                                                Page  
          3


          The bill also requires the Commission, after consultation  
          with the DFG and Dungeness crab vessel permit holders, to  
          either adjust the crab vessel permit fee for persons taking  
          crab in and south of District 10, or establish a landing  
          fee or vessel stamp, as the Commission determines  
          necessary, to cover all reasonable costs incurred by the  
          DFG in administering and enforcing the provisions of this  
          section.  Requires the Commission to take into account the  
          permit fees currently paid by crab vessel owners.

          It also specifies that a violation of the 250-trap limit is  
          punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of not  
          more than $5,000.  The bill makes a technical change in the  
          requirements for removing crab traps from the ocean.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

             Major Provisions                2004-05     2005-06     
             2006-07               Fund  

            Regulations         $50                            
            Special*

            Enforcement                   $328      $243       
            Special*

            Advisory Committee            unknown, potentially less  
            than $50            Special*

            * Fish and Game Preservation Fund

           SUPPORT :   (Verified  8/18/04)

          Crab Boat Owners Association, Inc. (source)
          Aqua Marine Inc.
          California Association of Harbor Masters and Port Captains
          Chinese Commercial Fishing Association
          County of Sonoma







                                                               AB 2146
                                                                Page  
          4

          Ecotrust
          Fisherman's Marketing Association of Bodega Bay
          Fisherman's Wharf Waterfront Advisory Group
          Frank's Fisherman's Supply Inc.
          Golden Gate Restaurant Association
          Half Moon Bay Fisherman's Marketing Association
          Morgan Fish Company
          Morning Star Fisheries
          Natural Resources Defense Council
          Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations
          San Mateo County Harbor District
          Scoma's Restaurant, Inc.
          The Monterey Fish Market 
          The Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/18/04)

          All Seas Wholesale
          Caito Fisheries, Inc.
          California Fisheries & Seafood Institute
          California Shellfish Company
          F. Alioto Fish Company
          Lusamerica Foods, Inc.
          Morro Bay Commercial Fishermen's Organization Inc.
          Pacific Fresh Sea Food Company, Inc.
          Slade Gorton & Company

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the sponsor, the Crab  
          Boat Owners Association, Inc., based in San Francisco, the  
          bill helps local boats resist the marketing power of larger  
          boats that come into the earlier southern season in  
          California and then harvest crab again in the later  
          northern California season.  The sponsor believes that the  
          provisions in the bill will prolong processing jobs on land  
          and harvesting jobs at sea because the supply of crab will  
          be steadier without an early glut caused by the larger  
          boats. 

          The Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations  
          considers the trap limit similar to those in Washington and  
          Alaska.  It also supports a specific grant of authority to  
          the Fish and Game Commission to develop Dungeness crab  
          regulations. 








                                                               AB 2146
                                                                Page  
          5

          Ecotrust believes that if resources such as crab are to  
          survive, that fishing should be limited to small boat  
          fleets and the communities that support them.   It supports  
          policies that promote equity, sustainability, and fleet  
          diversity. 

          Natural Resources Defense Council supports the bill and  
          notes that the lack of a trap limit allows fishermen to  
          increase their effort with regard to this resource despite  
          the limited entry system. It notes that closures of other  
          fisheries is creating pressures on the crab resource. 

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The Morro Bay Commercial  
          Fishermen's Organization believes the bill will have an  
          adverse fiscal effect on its members. 

          Caito Fisheries in Ft. Bragg does not believe that an  
          optimum level for the crab fishery can ever be established,  
          given the cyclical nature of the fishery, the minimum size  
          limit, and the prohibition on take of females. 

          Other individual fishermen from northern California oppose  
          the bill as overtly preferential and an attempt to limit a  
          significant portion of this fishery "to an exclusive few." 

          Pacific Choice Seafood contends that the bill is intended  
          to limit competition and favor only the smallest operators.  



           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Berg, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan, Chavez, Chu,  
            Cohn, Corbett, Correa, Diaz, Dutra, Dymally, Firebaugh,  
            Frommer, Goldberg, Hancock, Harman, Jerome Horton,  
            Jackson, Kehoe, Koretz, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Liu,  
            Longville, Lowenthal, Matthews, Montanez, Mullin, Nakano,  
            Nation, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Reyes, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Salinas, Simitian, Steinberg, Vargas, Wesson, Wiggins,  
            Wolk, Yee, Nunez
          NOES:  Aghazarian, Bates, Benoit, Bogh, Campbell, Cogdill,  
            Cox, Daucher, Dutton, Garcia, Haynes, Shirley Horton,  
            Houston, Keene, La Malfa, La Suer, Maddox, Maldonado,  
            Maze, McCarthy, Mountjoy, Nakanishi, Pacheco, Plescia,  
            Richman, Runner, Samuelian, Spitzer, Strickland, Wyland







                                                               AB 2146
                                                                Page  
          6

          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bermudez, Leslie, Negrete McLeod


          CP:mel  8/18/04   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****