BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






          
                SENATE HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
                      Senator Denise Moreno Ducheny, Chair


          Bill No:                             AB 2348Hearing:June  
          21, 2004
          Author:                              MullinFiscal:Yes
          Version:                              June 16,  
          2004Consultant: Mark Stivers

                  PLANNING AND APPROVAL OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING

           Background and Existing Law  :

           Housing element law  :  The Planning and Zoning Law requires  
          cities and counties to prepare and adopt a general plan to  
          guide the future growth of a community.  Every general plan  
          must contain seven elements: land use, circulation,  
          housing, conservation, open-space, noise, and safety.  A  
          housing element must identify and analyze existing and  
          projected housing needs, identify adequate sites with  
          appropriate zoning to meet the housing needs of all income  
          segments of the community, and ensure that regulatory  
          systems provide opportunities for, and do not unduly  
          constrain, housing development.

          In order to identify adequate sites to meet its housing  
          needs, a community must conduct an inventory of land that  
          allows for new residential development or refill  
          development at higher densities.  To the extent that the  
          inventory does not demonstrate enough capacity to meet the  
          community's fair share of the regional housing need (RHNA),  
          the community must adopt a program to provide appropriately  
          zoned sites early enough in the planning period to allow  
          for development of the sites.  Frequently, this program  
          requires a commitment to rezone specific sites for  
          higher-density residential development by a specific date.   
          Any sites that must be rezoned to meet the RHNA must permit  
          development by right, which is defined as not requiring a  
          conditional use permit.

          Under current law, a community may substitute up to 25% of  
          its RHNA requirement with an express commitment in the  
          housing element that affordable low and very-low income  
          housing units will be provided through the substantial  




          AB 2348                                                   
          Page 2



          rehabilitation of units at imminent risk of loss to the  
          housing stock, through the purchase of affordability  
          covenants that constitute a net increase in affordable  
          housing, and through the preservation of at-risk affordable  
          housing developments.  With respect to counting  
          substantially rehabilitated units, the units must  
          previously have been vacant or subject to being vacant for  
          at least 120 days due to the existence of extensive code  
          violations.

           Anti-NIMBY law  :  Before proceeding with the construction or  
          rehabilitation of a housing project, a developer must  
          submit development plans to the city or county for  
          approval.  Under state law, a city or county must make one  
          of the following findings before denying an affordable  
          housing project:

           The city or county has adopted a housing element in  
            substantial compliance with the law, and the project is  
            not needed to meet the jurisdiction's share of regional  
            housing needs for lower-income households;
           The project would have an adverse impact to the public  
            health or safety and there is no way to mitigate or avoid  
            adverse impacts;
           The denial is required to comply with state or federal  
            law;
           Approval of the project would increase the concentration  
            of lower-income households in a neighborhood that already  
            has a disproportionately high number of lower-income  
            households, and there is no feasible method of approving  
            the development at a different site;
           The project is located on agricultural or resource  
            preservation land or land that does not have adequate  
            water or waste water facilities; or
           The jurisdiction has adopted a housing element, and the  
            project is inconsistent with the general plan and the  
            zoning ordinance.

           Density bonus law  .  Existing law also requires a city or  
          county to grant a density bonus and at least one other  
          specified incentive, or other housing incentives of  
          equivalent value, to a developer who agrees to construct an  
          affordable housing development of five or more units unless  
          the local government makes a finding that the bonus and  
          incentives are not needed to achieve affordability.  The  
          density bonus must be at least 25% over the existing  




          AB 2348                                                   
          Page 3



          maximum density for the site.  The incentives the local  
          government may offer include:

           A reduction in site development standards;
           A modification of zoning code requirements (including a  
            reduction in setbacks, square footage requirements, or  
            parking spaces, or architectural design requirements that  
            exceed the minimum building standards);
           Approval of mixed use zoning in conjunction with the  
            housing project if commercial, office, industrial, or  
            other  land uses will reduce the cost of the housing  
            development,  and if such nonresidential uses are  
            compatible with the project; or
           Other regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by  
            the developer or the city or county that result in  
            identifiable cost reductions.

           Proposed Law  :

          Assembly Bill 2348 makes a number of changes to laws  
          pertaining to the planning and development of affordable  
          housing, including housing element law, the anti-NIMBY  
          statute, and density bonus law.  Specifically, the bill:

           Housing element adequate site requirement
           
           Requires the land inventory to include 1) a listing of  
            properties by parcel number; 2) the size, general plan  
            designation and zoning of each property; 3) for  
            redevelopment sites, a description of existing uses for  
            the properties and an explanation of the methodology for  
            determining additional development capacity; 4) a general  
            description of infrastructure supply and environmental  
            constraints in the community; 5) a map showing location  
            of the sites; and 6) an analysis of the number of units  
            that can be accommodated on the sites, based on the  
            zoning as adjusted to accommodate required development  
            standards.
           Establishes "rule of thumb" guidelines for determining  
            the densities that will accommodate lower income housing.  
             These guidelines vary in accordance with a community's  
            classification as a metropolitan, suburban, or  
            nonmetropolitan.
           Clarifies that the housing element program must commit to  
            rezone sites to make up any difference between the RHNA  
            and sites identified in the inventory.




          AB 2348                                                   
          Page 4



           Redefines "use by right," which is required for all sites  
            to be rezoned for lower income housing under the housing  
            element program, to mean that the use shall not require a  
            conditional use permit or other local government review  
            or approval which constitutes a project for purposes of  
            CEQA.  The use may be subject to design review which  
            shall not constitute a project for purposes of CEQA.   
            Sites subject to the by right requirement shall meet  
            minimum density standards, and only half may allow  
            non-residential uses.

           Counting rehabilitated and acquisition units towards the  
          RHNA  .

           With respect to counting rehabilitated units towards  
            meeting a community's RHNA obligation, removes the  
            requirement that the units be vacant or subject to being  
            vacated prior to rehabilitation and allows the community  
            to provide required relocation benefits outside of the  
            Relocation Assistance Law if the benefits equal at least  
            four months rent and moving expenses and comparable  
            replacement housing.
           With respect to counting units newly made affordable with  
            affordability covenants towards its RHNA obligation,  
            allows units in developments of four or more units, as  
            opposed to 16 or more, to qualify, repeals the  
            requirement that the acquisition price be less than 120%  
            of the median housing price for the community, and  
            increase the term of the required affordability covenants  
            from 30 to 55 years.

           Anti-NIMBY law
           
           Provides that zoning inconsistency cannot be used to deny  
            or condition a development if the reason for the  
            inconsistency is the jurisdiction's failure to conform  
            the zoning and land use designation to the housing  
            element.
           Removes overconcentration as a reason for developments to  
            be denied or conditioned.
           Provides that a local government may apply objective,  
            quantifiable, written, development standards so long as  
            they accommodate development at the allowed densities and  
            are consistent with meeting the jurisdiction's housing  
            need.





          AB 2348                                                   
          Page 5



           Density bonus law
           
           At the request of the applicant, limits parking  
            requirements for density bonus developments to a  
            specified number of spaces per unit and allows the spaces  
            to be provided through tandem or uncovered parking.
           Allows a developer to seek further parking reductions as  
            one of the incentives or concessions required under  
            density bonus law.





           Comments  :

          1.   Purpose of the bill  .  Developers of affordable housing  
          often cite the lack of adequately zoned sites and the  
          uncertainty of the land use entitlement process as two of  
          the major barriers to the development of new housing.   
          While housing element law requires communities to identify  
          adequate sites to accommodate their fair share of the  
          regional housing needs, the information in the element  
          often is too general to identify specific sites and fails  
          to account for serious constraints to development such as  
          lack of infrastructure capacity and existing uses of the  
          sites.  Moreover, when developments are proposed for  
          specific sites, unrealistic development standards, such as  
          excessive parking requirements, and community opposition  
          can often derail the project.  This bill is intended to  
          facilitate the development of affordable housing by making  
          planning more meaningful, limiting excessive parking  
          requirements for density bonus developments, and  
          strengthening protections against arbitrary project  
          denials.

          2.   A collaborative process  .  This bill and AB 2158  
          (Lowenthal) were developed as a consensus package by the  
          Housing Element Working Group that was convened over the  
          last year by HCD.  Because these bills are a package but  
          appeal to different constituencies within the working  
          group, it may be prudent to make them contingent upon each  
          other to ensure that their fates are linked.  The committee  
          may wish to consider an amendment to make enactment of this  
          bill contingent upon enactment of AB 2348.             
          3.   Technical and chaptering amendments  .  In order to help  




          AB 2348                                                   
          Page 6



          resolve chaptering conflicts with AB 2702 (Steinberg) and  
          correct a typographical error, the following amendments are  
          suggested:

           In 65583.2(a) strike "655583" and insert "65583"
           In 65583.2(i) after "conditional use permit" insert ",  
            planned unit development permit"
           
          Related Legislation  :

          AB 2158 (Lowenthal) significantly revises the regional  
          housing needs assessment process under housing element law.  
           This bill will be heard in the Housing Committee on June  
          21.

          AB 2702 (Steinberg), among other things, amends the  
          definition of "by right" development required for sites to  
          be rezoned under the housing element program.  This bill  
          will be heard in the Housing Committee on June 21.

           Previous Actions  :

          Assembly Floor:                         78-0
          Assembly Appropriations:                21-0
          Assembly Housing and Community Development:  8-0
          Assembly Local Government:           9-0



           Support and Opposition  :  (6/16/04)

           Support  :  Housing California

           Opposition  :  none received