BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






          SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT    BILL NO: AB 2711
          Nell Soto, Chair              Hearing date: June 14, 2004
          AB 2711 (Leno)     as introduced February 20, 2004        
          FISCAL:   YES

           PERS:  AUTHORIZE TRANSFER OF ASSETS TO SAN FRANCISCO  
          RETIREMENT SYSTEM UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES
           
           HISTORY  :

              Sponsor:  Author

              Prior legislation:  None

           ASSEMBLY VOTES  :

              PER & SS                   9-0           3/31/04
              Appropriations             19-0          4/14/04
              Assembly Floor             76-0          4/22/04
           
          SUMMARY  :

          Would authorize the Public Employees' Retirement System  
          (PERS) to enter into an agreement for the transfer of assets  
          to the City and County of San Francisco retirement, system  
          under specified circumstances. 

           BACKGROUND  :  
           
          The Committee is advised that, in 1996, the San Francisco  
          Airport Police, who had been members of PERS, were  
          transferred to the San Francisco Police Department, who are  
          members of the San Francisco Employees Retirement System  
          (SFERS).

          In 1996, both the San Francisco Police Department and the San  
          Francisco Airport Police provided the 2% @ age 50 formula  
          prospectively under SFERS.  For retirement purposes, the  
          members were transferred to SFERS in 1996 for prospective  
          service only, and their prior service and contributions as  
          airport police from before 1996 remained in PERS.

          Recently, the City and County of San Francisco agreed to  
          increase the San Francisco police retirement formula to 3% @  
          David Felderstein
          Date: 5/13/04                                          Page 1  









          age 55 for all future and prior service.  However, the former  
          San Francisco airport police employees still have their prior  
          service with PERS at the 2% @ age 50 formula, so their prior  
          service has not been increased to the higher formula along  
          with the other officers.

          Although San Francisco could contract with PERS to increase  
          the retirement formula on the prior service of the former  
          airport police, they would have to increase the formula for  
          other county peace officers included in their PERS contract,  
          since the law prohibits an employer from increasing benefits  
          for a subgroup within a member classification.































          David Felderstein
          Date: 5/13/04                                          Page 2  









           ANALYSIS  :

          1)   Existing PERS law  authorizes the PERS Board to enter into  
          an agreement with the '37 Act county boards of retirement for  
          the transfer of assets and liabilities from PERS to the '37  
          Act county retirement system with respect to safety members  
          who have  ceased to be employed  by a PERS public agency or the  
          state, and who  have been employed  by a '37 Act county, fire  
          authority, or district as a result of a transfer of  
          firefighting or law enforcement functions.

          2)   This bill  authorizes the PERS Board to enter into an  
          agreement with the retirement board of the San Francisco City  
          and County Employees' Retirement System to facilitate the  
          transfer of assets and liabilities with respect to safety  
          members who are now employed by the City and County of San  
          Francisco as a result of a transfer of firefighting or law  
          enforcement functions.


           FISCAL EFFECT  :
          
          No cost other than administrative costs related to the  
          negotiation and preparation of the transfer agreement.


           COMMENTS  :

          1)   SUPPORT  :

               American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees (AFSCME)
               CalPERS Board of Administration

          2)   OPPOSITION :

                None to date







          David Felderstein
          Date: 5/13/04                                          Page 3  


















                                      #####

































          David Felderstein
          Date: 5/13/04                                          Page 4