BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    





                                                                  AB 2850

                                                                  Page  1

          GOVERNOR'S VETO
          AB 2850 (Ridley-Thomas)
          As Amended April 27, 2004
          2/3 vote


           LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT      6-2   APPROPRIATIONS    15-5          

           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Koretz, Mullin, Lieber,   |Ayes:|Chu, Berg, Calderon,      |
          |     |Chu, Laird, Leno          |     |Corbett, Firebaugh,       |
          |     |                          |     |Goldberg, Leno, Nation,   |
          |     |                          |     |Negrete McLeod, Oropeza,  |
          |     |                          |     |Pavley, Ridley-Thomas,    |
          |     |                          |     |Wesson, Wiggins, Yee      |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Shirley Horton, Houston   |Nays:|Runner, Bates, Daucher,   |
          |     |                          |     |Haynes, Keene             |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ASSEMBLY:      43-33   (May 17, 2004)                        
          SENATE:        21-14          (August 24, 2004)        

          SUMMARY  :  Establishes requirements and procedures related to the  
          continued employment of private security officers at a job site  
          following the termination of a contract for private security  
          services.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Enacts the Private Security Service Assurance Act, which  
            applies to contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2005.  


          2)Requires a terminated contractor to provide to the successor  
            contractor the name, date of hire, and job classification of  
            each employee employed at the job site or sites, within three  
            working days after receiving notification that a contract for  
            private security services has been terminated. 

          3)Requires successor contractors and successor subcontractors to  
            retain, for a period of 90 days, certain employees who were  










                                                                  AB 2850

                                                                  Page  2

            employed at that site by the previous contractor or  
            subcontractor, unless the successor contractor or successor  
            subcontractor has reasonable and substantiated cause not to  
            hire a particular employee based on that employee's  
            performance or conduct while working under the terminated  
            contract. 

          4)Provides that the successor contractor or successor  
            subcontractor is not required to pay the same wages or offer  
            the same benefits as were provided by the prior contractor or  
            prior subcontractor. 

          5)Provides that if the successor contractor or successor  
            subcontractor determines that fewer employees are needed to  
            execute the successor service contract or successor  
            subcontract than were required under the terminated contract  
            or terminated subcontract, the successor contractor or  
            successor subcontractor shall retain employees by seniority  
            within the job classification. 

          6)Prohibits the dismissal without cause any employee retained  
            pursuant to this bill, unless the dismissal was based only on  
            the performance or conduct of the particular employee. 

          7)Requires the successor contractor or successor subcontractor  
            to maintain a preferential hiring list of eligible covered  
            employees not retained by the successor contractor or  
            successor subcontractor from which to hire additional  
            employees during the 90-day period. 

          8)Requires that employees retained under this bill's provisions  
            for that 90-day period be offered continued employment if  
            their performance during that 90-day period is satisfactory. 

          9)Requires at the end of the 90-day transition employment  
            period, a successor contractor or successor subcontractor  
            provide a written performance evaluation to each employee  
            retained pursuant to this bill, and to offer continued  
            employment to those employees whose performance is deemed  
            satisfactory. 

          10)Provides that any employment after the 90-day transition  










                                                                  AB 2850

                                                                  Page  3

            employment period shall be at-will employment under which the  
            employee may be terminated without cause. 

          11)Authorizes an employee who was not retained in accordance  
            with this bill's provisions, or his or her agent, to bring an  
            enforcement action in a court of competent jurisdiction, as  
            specified, and receive backpay, as provided, upon  
            determination of a violation.

          12)Prohibits an employee from maintaining a cause of action  
            solely for the failure of an employer to provide a written  
            performance evaluation, in absence of a claim that the  
            employee was terminated in violation of this bill's  
            provisions.  

          13)Provides that, except as specified, nothing in this chapter  
            changes or increases the relationship or duties of a property  
            owner or an awarding authority, or their agents, with respect  
            to contractors, subcontractors, or their employees. 

          14)Provides that nothing in this bill limits the right of a  
            property owner or an awarding authority to terminate a service  
            contract or to replace a contractor with another contractor or  
            with the property owner's or awarding authority's own  
            employees. 

          15)Authorizes local government agencies to enact ordinances  
            imposing stricter standards or additional enforcement  
            provisions.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, no state fiscal impact.  This bill provides for a  
          civil enforcement remedy. 

           COMMENTS  :  This bill, which is sponsored by the Service  
          Employees International Union (SEIU), gives private security  
          officers protected employment status at a job site for 90 days  
          following a change of contractors.  The successor contractor  
          would generally be required to retain the employees of the  
          former contractor during that period.  At the end of the period,  
          the successor would be required to offer the employees continued  
          employment if the employee's performance during that 90-day  










                                                                  AB 2850

                                                                  Page  4

          period is satisfactory.  This bill's protection of employee  
          status expires after that time.  The transition period allows  
          employees to keep their jobs by demonstrating their worth to a  
          successor contractor.  However, after 90 days an employee can be  
          fired for any reason.

          Property owners are explicitly exempt from the main requirements  
          of this bill.  Under this bill, property owners, or a party  
          acting on their behalf, are required to indicate to a terminated  
          contractor whether a successor service contract has been awarded  
          and identify the name and address of the successor contractor.   
          This bill's retention requirements primarily apply only to  
          contract private security companies.


            Other legislation:  This bill is modeled after SB 20 (Alarcon),  
          Chapter 795, Statutes of 2001, which applies to the janitorial  
          industry.  SB 20 requires successor janitorial contractors to  
          retain, for a specified transition period, the employees of the  
          previous employer performing janitorial or building maintenance  
          service duties with four months or more service.  The main  
          differences between this bill and SB 20 are the transition  
          period, which is only 60 days under SB 20, and the definition of  
          "contractor."  Under SB 20, only contractors employing 25 or  
          more individuals are subject to its requirements.  This bill  
          sets no such standard.


          SB 1521 (Alarcon), pending in the Senate, extends the 60-day  
          period under SB 20 to 90 days and subjects property owners to  
          the notice and retention requirements of SB 20, as well as  
          placing a specified restriction on the property owner's right to  
          terminate contracts. 

           GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE  :

               This bill requires private security service  
               contractors to retain employees employed by the  
               previous contractor for a period of at least 90 days.   
               Since security concerns, particularly in California's  
               high rises and government buildings, are higher than  
               ever before, it is imperative that security service  










                                                                  AB 2850

                                                                  Page  5

               contractors are able to make the necessary staffing  
               decisions that best provide the security their clients  
               demand.

               In many cases, a new contractor will call upon the  
               knowledge and expertise of the existing employees in  
               order to provide that protection.  This is even more  
               likely considering the amount of training required for  
               private security guards under current law.  Retaining  
               current employees would not only provide the  
               contractor this expertise but also save the contractor  
               the costs of the training.  A statutory mandate is not  
               needed for contractors to appreciate these incentives.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Nick Louizos / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091

           
                                                                 FN: 0009159