BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                    Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                                                13 (Romero)
          Hearing Date:  4/28/03               Amended: April 3, 2003
          Consultant:     Miriam Barcellona Ingenito    Policy Vote:  
          EQ 5-2        
          ____________________________________________________________ 
          ___
          BILL SUMMARY:  SB 13 would (1) enact the Radiation Safety  
          Act of 2003 (RSA) and (2) prohibit the disposal of  
          radioactive waste at specified facilities.
                              Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
           Major Provisions        2003-04             2004-05               2005-06   
           Fund  
          DTSC Regs./Permits   $300                $600                  $600   
                      SF*
            Enforcement
           DHS                              Unknown, potentially significant     
                           GF
          *Hazardous Waste Control Account
          STAFF COMMENTS:  This bill meets the criteria for referral  
          to the Suspense file.  RSA would do the following:  (1)  
          make definitions; (2) prohibit the disposal of radioactive  
          waste in the State except at those facilities that are  
          permitted or licensed for that particular type and amount  
          of radioactive waste under the Radiation Control Law, or by  
          the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; and (3) exempt specified  
          radioactive materials from the disposal limitations,  
          including radioactive materials that are commonly used in  
          medicine, biotechnology, and academia that meet specified  
          criteria.  

          In order to implement this bill, the Department of Toxic  
          Substances Control (DTSC) would require about five  
          positions ($500,000). According to DTSC, even though SB 13  
          does not explicitly require it to adopt regulations, it  
          does add a new prohibition that it would have to enforce;  
          consequently, the department would have to either adopt  
          regulations or establish permit conditions.  STAFF NOTES  
          that while the proponents of the bill have claimed that  
          this prohibition already exists as a condition of the three  
          hazardous waste facilities DTSC already permitted, DTSC  
          contends that it is not the case and the permits do allow  
          some radioactive waste into those facilities.  DTSC further  
          contends existing law makes DHS solely regulate radioactive  
          waste; therefore, SB 13 would give it new enforcement  
          requirements.











          DHS issues licenses under the Radiation Control Law to  
          facilities to receive radioactive materials.  SB 13 would  
          require that licenses issued by DHS under the Radiation  
          Control Law also comply with the restriction of RSA. SB 13  
          would prohibit DHS from granting exemptions from the RSA. 

          DHS indicates that SB 13 would result in significant costs  
          associated with the "extremely restrictive level of  
          regulation" that set clean up standards to equal that of  
          background. DHS estimates to achieve the new standards, it  
          would need more sophisticated equipment, additional  
          inspection staff, additional laboratory positions, and  
          additional review staff for evaluating the extensive  
          surveying and sampling plans necessary to ensure "no  
          radioactivity" is disposed of in a landfill (costs could be  
          in the millions).  STAFF NOTES that proponents of SB 13  
          disagree with DHS's assessment and believe that the bill's  
          requirements could be met within existing resources.   
          Additionally, proponents note that DHS tried to deregulate  
          radioactive waste to below 25 millirem dose, but the court  
          struck down the effort and required that if DHS wanted to  
          make that rule, it had to fully comply with CEQA and  
          complete an EIR.  Proponents believe that by setting the  
          standard in law, DHS is saved the costs of going through  
          the costly CEQA process.