BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 493|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 493
          Author:   Cedillo (D)
          Amended:  1/26/04
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENV. QUALITY COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 1/12/04
          AYES:  Sher, Chesbro, Figueroa, Kuehl, Romero
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Denham, McPherson

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  12-1, 1/22/04
          AYES:  Alpert, Battin, Ashburn, Bowen, Burton, Escutia,  
            Johnson, Karnette, Machado, Murray, Poochigian, Speier
          NOES:  Aanestad


           SUBJECT  :    Hazardous materials:  liability

           SOURCE :     California Building Industry Association
                      Home Ownership Advancement Foundation


           DIGEST  :    This bill enacts the California Land Reuse and  
          Revitalization Act to, among other things, grant immunity  
          to innocent landowners" (ILs), "bona fide prospective  
          purchasers" (BFPs) and contiguous property owners  from  
          contribution actions, and from additional cleanup of a  
          contaminated site that has been "reopened".

           ANALYSIS  :    Generally, federal and state laws provide that  
          current and previous owners of a contaminated site are  
          jointly and severally liable for the cleanup costs.  Thus,  
          all parties may be held responsible for the entire amount,  
          regardless of fault.  If a party finds itself paying more  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 493
                                                                Page  
          2

          than its fair share of the cleanup costs, that party may  
          bring a contribution action to collect from other  
          responsible parties.  

          Current law allows government agencies to order the cleanup  
          of contaminated sites, and to undertake cleanup efforts,  
          under certain circumstances, and to recover such costs from  
          responsible parties.  Current law also allows government  
          agencies to "reopen" a cleanup action under certain  
          circumstances. 

          Current federal law also provides that if the government  
          incurs clean-up costs at a site where the owner qualifies  
          as a BFP, the government shall have a lien on the property  
          for the unrecovered costs.  The lien remains in place until  
          satisfied by sale of the property or other means.   

          Recent changes to federal law establish affirmative  
          defenses against cleanup litigation to ILs, landowners,  
          contiguous property owners, and BFPs of superfund sites, if  
          they meet certain conditions.  This bill would enact  
          similar and broader immunity provisions in state law.  The  
          immunity provisions in this bill would essentially apply to  
          all contaminated properties other than state and federal  
          superfund sites, i.e. brownfields, underground storage  
          tanks, etc.

          The DTSC conducts and oversees an average of 220 sites at  
          any given time, and completes an average of 125 per year.   
          DTSC also administers the Expedited Remedial Action Pilot  
          (ERAP) program, and the Prospective Purchaser Agreement  
          (PPA) program to encourage the cleanup of "brownfields" and  
          other sites.  ERAP program benefits include: restructuring  
          liability based on fair and equitable standards;  
          eligibility for the state to pay the "orphan share" of the  
          cleanup costs; providing indemnification protection through  
          a covenant not to sue; and allowing risk-based cleanup. PPA  
          program benefits include:  reducing the liability for  
          prospective brownfield purchasers; a commitment from DTSC  
          to not pursue enforcement against prospective purchasers  
          if, for example, they are not responsible for the  
          contamination, and there are responsible parties who are  
          willing to clean up the site.








                                                                SB 493
                                                                Page  
          3

          This bill, among other things:  

          1.Grants, subject to certain conditions, ILs, BFPs, and  
            contiguous property owners, as defined, immunity from  
            claims made by any non-governmental agency for cleanup  
            costs. 

          2.Prohibits DTSC or a regional board from taking any action  
            to require an IL to conduct any response action unless  
            the agency does certain things.

          3.Specifies that if there are unrecovered costs incurred by  
            an agency at a site for which an owner of the site is not  
            liable as a BFP, the agency shall have a lien on the  
            property for such costs. 

          4.Requires Cal-EPA to develop a form that shall be  
            completed and submitted to the agency by a party who has  
            immunity pursuant to the provisions of this bill. 

          5.Requires an IL, BFP, or contiguous landowner to reimburse  
            an agency for its reasonable oversight costs incurred  
            while reviewing a response plan or overseeing the  
            implementation of a response plan.

          6.Requires Cal-EPA to annually submit a report to the  
            Legislature on brownfield remediations. 

          7.Contains a January 1, 2010 sunset date.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                              Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2004-05     2005-06     
           2006-07   Fund  

          DTSC/regional boards                         Unknown,  
          potentially significant                      General/
                              stranded additional cleanup costs      
          Various/Local







                                                                SB 493
                                                                Page  
          4


          Oversight/review of                     Potentially  
          significant costs,                           General/
          response actions, etc                             probably  
          offset by reimbursements                          Var./Loc
                              from applicants.

          Litigation                                   Unknown,  
          potentially significant                      General
                              costs to DTSC and regional boards        
                                   Var./Loc.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  1/26/04)

          California Building Industry Association (co-source)
          Home Ownership Advancement Foundation (co-source)
          American Farmland Trust
          Anschutz Entertainment Group
          Bridge Housing
          Burbank Housing Development Corporation
          California Bankers Association
          California Center for Land Recycling
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
          Californians for Justice
          Cities of East Palo Alto and West Hollywood
          Civil Justice Association of California
          East Palo Alto Community Alliance and Neighborhood  
            Development Organization
          Endangered Habitats League
          FannieMae
          Job-Center Housing Coalition
          Greenlining Institute
          Greenlining Coalition
          LTSC Community Development Corporation
          Latino Issues Forum
          Lenders for Community Development
          Little Hoover Commission
          League of California Cities
          Livable Places
          Mexican American Community Services Agency, Inc.
          Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition
          Olive Branches
          Peninsula Habitat for Humanity







                                                                SB 493
                                                                Page  
          5

          Ralphs/Food4Less
          Rural Communities Housing Development Corporation
          Southern California Association of Non-Profit Housing
          The Spanish Speaking Unity Council

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  1/26/04)

          (The following groups opposed a prior version of the bill.   
          It is not known at the time of this writing whether recent  
          amendments would resolve their concerns.)

          California Environmental Rights Alliance
          California League of Conservation Voters
          California Communities Against Toxics
          California Safe Schools
          Center for Environmental Health
          Community Coalition for Change
          Consumer Attorneys of California
          Del Amo Action Committee
          Desert Citizens Against Pollution
          Environmental Working Group
          Health the Bay
          Marin-Goldengate Learning Disability Coalition
          Physicians For Social Responsibility
          Sierra Club California

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the Civil Justice  
          Association of California:

          "If enacted, Senate Bill 493 will provide bona fide  
          prospective purchasers of previously contaminated tracts of  
          land known as "brownfields" with conditional liability  
          protection from specified statutes that impose liability  
          for preexisting pollution conditions.  It provides these  
          purchasers with limited liability relief when they meet  
          certain conditions, such as showing the contamination  
          occurred before purchase of the site, making appropriate  
          inquiries into previous ownership, and exercising  
          appropriate care in dealing with prior hazardous material  
          releases.  SB 493 provides these same protections to  
          innocent landowners and contiguous property owners.

          "SB 493 retains the "polluter pays" principle, so that the  
          actual polluter of the site is held responsible for  







                                                                SB 493
                                                                Page  
          6

          contamination.  This liability protection is critical to  
          developers who are making decisions to redevelop these  
          sites.  It will encourage development and cleanup of  
          "brownfields".

          "This liability protection will provide the opportunity for  
          the redevelopment of many abandoned and undeveloped  
          property sites in California.  This presents opportunities  
          for employment, housing, business, and a better  
          environment."


          CP:cmnl  1/26/04   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****