BILL ANALYSIS
SB 796
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 20, 2003
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Darrell Steinberg, Chair
SB 796 (Dunn) - As Amended: July 16, 2003
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:9-4
Labor 5-2
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill authorizes civil penalties for Labor Code violations
and authorizes aggrieved employees to bring private actions and
collect civil penalties for such violations. Specifically, this
bill:
1)Provides that any Labor Code violation for which specific
civil penalties have not otherwise been established shall be
subject to a civil penalty of $100 for each aggrieved employee
per pay period for an initial violation, and $200 for each
aggrieved employee per pay period for continuing violations.
The penalty would be $500 per violation for a violator who is
not an employer.
2)Provides that an aggrieved employee may sue to recover civil
penalties under the Labor Code, as well as attorneys' fees and
costs, in an action brought on behalf of himself or herself
and other current or former employees. However, no private
action may be maintained where the state labor agency (LWDA)
issues a citation against the alleged violator on the same
facts and under the same section or sections of the Labor
Code.
3)Provides that any penalties recovered in an action by an
aggrieved employee shall be distributed as follows: 50 percent
to the General Fund, 25 percent to the LWDA for employer
education, and 25 percent to the aggrieved employee(s). In the
case of penalties recovered against a violator who is not an
employer, the revenues would be divided evenly between the
General Fund and the LWDA.
SB 796
Page 2
FISCAL EFFECT
Potential increased penalty revenue to the General Fund and to
the LWDA.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . This bill is sponsored by the California Labor
Federation and the California Rural Assistance Legal
Foundation. The sponsors state that many Labor Code provisions
are unenforced because they are punishable only as criminal
misdemeanors, with no civil penalty or other sanction
attached. Since district attorneys tend to direct their
resources to violent crimes and other public priorities,
supporters argue, Labor Code violations rarely result in
criminal investigations and prosecutions. As a result,
supporters state, employers may violate the law with impunity.
The sponsors also state that private actions to enforce the
Labor Code are needed because LWDA simply does not have the
resources to pursue all of the labor violations occurring in
the garment industry, agriculture, and other industries. The
bill would authorizes civil penalties for any Labor Code
violation currently lacking a specific penalty provision and
authorizes aggrieved employees to bring private civil actions
against employers.
2)Opposition . Opponents include several employer groups, the
California Employment Law Council, and the Civil Justice
Association of California. Opponents are concerned that, in
particular, the provision for recovery of attorneys' fees will
encourage private attorneys to "act as vigilantes" to file
frivolous Labor Code-related lawsuits.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081