BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                SB 981
                                                                       

                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                               Byron D. Sher, Chairman
                              2003-2004 Regular Session
                                           
           BILL NO:    SB 981
           AUTHOR:     Soto & Romero
           AMENDED:    April 3, 2003
           FISCAL:     Yes               HEARING DATE:     April 21, 2003
           URGENCY:    No                CONSULTANT:       Bruce Jennings
            
           SUBJECT  :    PETROLEUM POLLUTION CLEANUP AND
                       PREVENTION ACT OF 2003

            SUMMARY  :    
           
            Existing law  :

           1)Establishes the Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards  
             Attainment Program (Carl Moyer), generally administered by  
             the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and implemented  
             with grants by air quality management districts and air  
             pollution control districts to offset the incremental cost  
             of projects that reduce the emissions of oxides of nitrogen  
             (Nox) from on-road trucks, off-road non-recreational  
             equipment, locomotives, diesel marine vessels, stationary  
             agricultural engines, and other diesel engines with high  
             emissions.

           2)Requires CARB to achieve the maximum degree of emission  
             reduction possible from vehicular and other mobile sources  
             in order to accomplish the attainment of state ambient air  
             quality standards by the earliest practicable date.

           3)Requires any air quality management district or air  
             pollution control district with a population of one million  
             residents or greater, until January 1, 2007, to spend at  
             least 50% of Carl Moyer moneys on the purchase of reduced  
             emission school buses, and diesel mitigation programs in  
             order to directly reduce public health threats from air  
             contaminants in communities with the most significant  
             exposures.

           4)Requires the Board of Equalization to collect two different  









                                                                SB 981
                                                                 Page 2

             fees on crude oil and petroleum products transported into,  
             across, and/or through the state.  The Oil Spill and  
             Prevention Fee (Section 8670.40 of the Government Code),  
             imposes a fee not to exceed $0.04 per barrel upon every  
             person owning crude oil at the time the crude oil is  
             received at a marine terminal from within or outside the  
             state, or upon owners of petroleum products received at a  
             marine terminal from outside the state.

           5)Imposes an oil spill response fee, capped at $0.25 per  
             barrel on every person owning petroleum products at the time  
             the petroleum products are received at a marine terminal in  
             this state by means of a vessel from a point of origin  
             outside this state.  The fee is also imposed on an operator  
             of a pipeline transporting petroleum products by means of a  
             pipeline operating across, under, or through the marine  
             water of this state and an operator of a refinery receiving  
             crude oil at a refinery in this state.  The Oil Spill  
             Response Trust Fund reached its $50 million maximum level in  
             1991-92 and no additional fees have been collected since  
             that time.

            This bill:

            1)Enacts the Children's Health and Petroleum Pollution  
             Remediation Act of 2003 and makes extensive legislative  
             findings regarding petroleum products and air pollution.

            2) Creates the Children's Health and Petroleum Pollution  
              Remediation Trust Fund in the State Treasury with the  
              specified purposes, including the receipt of fees  
              established in this bill.

            3) Requires every operator of a refinery to pay a fee equal  
              to thirty cents for each barrel of crude oil that is used  
              for the production of gasoline and diesel fuels, collected  
              monthly, paid to the State Board of Equalization (BOE), and  
              transmitted to the Fund.

            4) Directs the Controller to distribute funds to each  
              district on the basis of a district's share of a statewide  
              emissions inventory, with each district receiving a minimum  
              of $250,000.









                                                                SB 981
                                                                 Page 3


            5) Requires each district to develop and expend funds on  
              petroleum pollution source reduction programs and public  
              health remediation programs.  The district must establish  
              that the programs will be based on a clear nexus regarding  
              the relative harm caused, or intended to mitigate or  
              prevent the relative harm created, by diesel and gasoline  
              fuel in that district's jurisdiction and the revenues  
              received from the fee.

            6) Provides various additional clarifying, technical, and  
              definitional provisions, including reimbursements for  
              administrative expenses.
            

            COMMENTS  :

            1) Purpose of Bill  .  The primary reason for introducing SB  
              981, according to the author, is that existing resources  
              are insufficient to mitigate the damaging effects to public  
              health and the environment resulting from the combustion of  
              petroleum products. SB 981 would authorize local air  
              districts, under specified conditions, to use the proceeds  
              of a fee for the treatment of damaging effects to public  
              health as well as the reduction of emission sources. 

               Proponents contend that the combustion of petroleum  
              products, especially gasoline and diesel fuels, is the  
              major source of ozone precursors, toxic air contaminants,  
              and particulate matter throughout the state.  Such  
              pollutants are a recognized cause of cancer in humans as  
              well as being strongly associated with respiratory  
              diseases.  The economic costs to the public are substantial  
              as measured by lost workdays and school attendance.

              Opponents argue that SB 981 is a disguised gas tax that  
              unfairly burdens the business community and low-income  
              households.  Additionally, opponents claim that the measure  
              would discourage refinery investments.

            2)Suggested Amendments.

               a)   Ensuring a Nexus between the fee and funded  









                                                                SB 981
                                                                 Page 4

                activities. The bill establishes that every operator of a  
                refinery pay a fee for that portion of a barrel of oil  
                that is refined within the state used for the production  
                of gasoline and diesel.   Given the possibility that oil  
                may be refined, but not sold and consumed within  
                California, the phrasing could further clarify that the  
                fee shall be administered by the Board of Equalization in  
                accordance with those fuels produced and consumed in  
                California. 

               b)   Avoiding Potentially Duplicative Health Research  
                Activities.   The Office of Environmental Health Hazard  
                Assessment represents the state's premier center for  
                conducting science reviews and establishing public health  
                objectives representing the basis for regulatory  
                standards, including important and continuing work on  
                cumulative risks for air pollutants.  By working in  
                consultation with the California Air Pollution Control  
                Officers Association, OEHHA could help to avoid  
                potentially duplicative public health research funded by  
                individual air districts in addition to coordinating and  
                consolidating health research projects.
               
               c)   Avoiding Potentially Duplicative Administrative  
                Activities. The bill calls on each district to coordinate  
                with any local, state, and federal agency as well as  
                non-governmental organizations for pollution mitigation  
                programs.    Given the potentially substantial  
                duplication of administrative activity across districts  
                to conduct this activity, the California Air Pollution  
                Control Officers Association could provide a more logical  
                forum for coordinating such activities.
               
               d)   Severability of Provisions. Given the prospective  
                litigation that might follow this measure should it be  
                signed into law, the author may wish to amend the measure  
                to include a severability clause so that other provisions  
                may continue should a judicial decision rule against a  
                specific provision.

            3)Background  .  In 2002, Assembly Bill 2682 (Chu) and Senate  
             Bill 1994 (Soto) would have required every operator of a  
             refinery to pay a fee of  $0.30 for each barrel of crude oil  









                                                                SB 981
                                                                 Page 5

             received at a refinery within the state.  Among other  
             things, the fee would have provided funding to a California  
             Environmental Protection Agency-administered program for  
             projects addressing petroleum-related contamination of  
             groundwater, marine and terrestrial surface waters, soil,  
             and drinking water supplies, and to the State Air Resources  
             Board to provide funding for the purchase of new, lower  
             emission school buses pursuant to guidelines adopted by the  
             State Air Resources Board.  Both bills were held in their  
             respective Appropriation Committees.

            4)Related Legislation.  The bill is similar to AB 1500 (Diaz &  
             Pavley) which imposes a one dollar fee per barrel of crude  
             oil to provide funding to the California Environmental  
             Protection Agency (Cal EPA) to fund investigative and  
             remedial projects addressing the contamination of soil,  
             drinking water supplies, groundwater, and marine and  
             terrestrial surface waters to the degree that a nexus to  
             petroleum products refined by a refiner can be established;  
             funds petroleum consumption reduction and pollution  
             prevention strategies established by the State Energy  
             Resources Conservation and Development Commission; funds the  
             development of new and/or expanded public transportation  
             systems, bicycle and pedestrian access and facilities; funds  
             the retrofitting or replacing of existing petroleum fueled  
             public transport buses and trains with alternative fuel  
             engines; and, funds diesel emission reduction programs, such  
             as the Carl Moyer Program and the Lower-Emission School Bus  
             Program administered by CARB. 

            SOURCE  :        South Coast Air Quality Management District  

           SUPPORT  : Able Industrial Products, Inc., Air Pollution Control  
                     District, Allsup Corp., American Lung Association  
                     (California, Inland Counties, Los Angeles County,  
                     San Diego and Imperial Counties), Another Cleaners &  
                     Laundry, AREE International Corp., Asthma & Allergy  
                     Foundation of America, A-Z Bus Sales, Azusa Pacific  
                     University, Bay Area Air Quality Management  
                     District, Big Bear City Community Services District  
                     Board of Directors, B'nai B'rith Southern  
                     California, California Air Pollution Control  
                     Officers Association, California Communities Against  









                                                                SB 981
                                                                 Page 6

                     Toxics, California League of Conservation Voters,  
                     California League of Conservation Voters Education  
                     Fund, California Natural Gas Vehicle Partnership,  
                     Casa De Los Amigos, Chino Valley Unified School  
                     District, City of Riverside, Clean Air Now, Clean  
                     Power Campaign, Coalition for Clean Air, Coalition  
                     for a Safe Environment, Coast-to-Coast Community  
                     Campaigns, Daniel Gutierrez and Associates, Earth  
                     Day Los Angeles, ENRG, Environment California,  
                     Environmental Defense, E-Tech Environmental,  J.  
                     Gallo Mobile Tree Grinding, Gas Equipment Systems,  
                     Inc., Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Orange County,  
                     Hollywood Test Only Station, International Visitors  
                     Council of Los Angeles, Latino Empowerment  
                     Foundation, Liberty Hill Foundation, Los Angeles  
                     County Bicycle Coalition, Los Angeles Unified School  
                     District, Los Angeles Interfaith Environmental  
                     Council, Los Amigos of Orange County, J. Miller  
                     Tractor Work, MD Environmental, Mission Hospital,  
                     Moroni Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council,  
                     North Valley Coalition, O.C. Korean American Health  
                     Information & Education Center, Physicians for  
                     Social Responsibility (Los Angeles & San Francisco  
                     Bay Area), Planning and Conservation League, Ron  
                     Lopez and Associates, Sandruce Engineering  
                     Consultants, St. John's Well Child Center, Schools'  
                     Involvement Program, Sierra Club California,  
                     Talavera's Fine Furniture Inc., Tetra Tech, Inc.,  
                     Union of Concerned Scientists, Universal Cylinder  
                     Exchange, University of California (Los Angeles &  
                     Irvine), Urban Dimensions, VELA Enterprises, Inc., 9  
                     individuals  

           OPPOSITION  :    California Chamber of Commerce, Irvine Chamber  
                          of Commerce, California Manufacturers and  
                          Technology Association, California Trucking  
                          Association, California Independent Petroleum  
                          Association, Consumers Against the Hidden  
                          GasTax, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association,  
                          Rodgers Trucking Company, Western States  
                          Petroleum Association, Yucca Valley Airport  
                          District  










                                                                SB 981
                                                                 Page 7