BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1334
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 14, 2004

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
                             Hannah-Beth Jackson, Chair
                     SB 1334 (Kuehl) - As Amended:  June 7, 2004

           SENATE VOTE  :  23-13
           
          SUBJECT  :  Oak woodland conversion.

           SUMMARY  :  This bill requires counties with oak woodlands to  
          develop voluntary oak conservation mitigation alternatives for  
          oak woodlands that are proposed to be converted to agricultural  
          uses.

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)The Oak Woodlands Conservation Act (Oak Act), which is  
            administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) in  
            consultation with the Department of Forestry and Fire  
            Protection (CDF), other public agencies, and affected private  
            entities, allocates bond proceeds from the Safe Neighborhood  
            Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act  
            of 2000 (The Villaraigosa-Keeley Act) (Public Resources Code  
            5096.300 et seq.) (Proposition 12) for the purchase of  
            conservation easements to protect oak woodlands, the  
            preparation of oak conservation elements for local general  
            plans and related purposes.

          2)The California Forest Legacy Program Act of 2000, which is  
            administered by CDF with staff assistance from the WCB,  
            provides for the acquisition of conservation easements to  
            protect oak woodlands, old growth forests, wildlife habitat,  
            and other forest resources. Funding for acquiring conservation  
            easements is provided from Proposition 12 bond proceeds and  
            matching funds pursuant to the federal forest legacy program.

          3)California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides a process  
            for evaluating the environmental effects of a project, and  
            includes statutory exemptions, as well as categorical  
            exemptions in the CEQA guidelines. If a project is not exempt  
            from CEQA, an initial study is prepared to determine whether a  
            project may have a significant effect on the environment.  If  
            the initial study shows that there would not be a significant  
            effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare a  








                                                                  SB 1334
                                                                  Page  2

            negative declaration. If the initial study shows that the  
            project may have a significant effect on the environment, the  
            lead agency must prepare an EIR. Generally, an environmental  
            impact report (EIR) must accurately describe the proposed  
            project, identify and analyze each significant environmental  
            impact expected to result from the proposed project, identify  
            mitigation measures to reduce those impacts to the extent  
            feasible and evaluate a range of reasonable alternatives to  
            the proposed project. Prior to approving any project that has  
            received environmental review, an agency must make certain  
            findings. If mitigation measures are required or incorporated  
            into a project, the agency must adopt a reporting or  
            monitoring program to ensure compliance with those measures. 








































                                                                  SB 1334
                                                                  Page  3


           THIS BILL  :

          1)Requires a county with oak woodlands to develop voluntary oak  
            conservation mitigation alternatives for oak woodlands that  
            are proposed to be converted to agricultural uses.

          2)Requires a county with oak woodlands to designate a county  
            official or agency to monitor agricultural oak woodlands  
            conversions and maintain records that include, but are not  
            limited to, all of the following:

             a)   Location of the conversion;

             b)   Number and species of oak trees that were removed;

             c)   Whether mitigation was successfully implemented; and,

             d)   Whether the mitigation was in conformance with  
               applicable state law.
             
          3)Defines "agricultural land" to include land that is used for  
            the purpose of producing or processing plant and animals  
            products for commercial purposes.

          4)Defines "oak" to mean a native tree species in the genus  
            Quercus, not designated as a commercial species pursuant to  
            regulations adopted by the State Board of Forestry and Fire  
            Protection and that is 5 inches or more in diameter at breast  
            height.

          5)Requires a county with oak woodlands to include in an oak  
            woodlands management plan, developed pursuant to the Oak Act,  
            the following:

             a)   Alternatives for mitigating the conversion of oak  
               woodlands that comply with this section; and,

             b)   Procedures to minimize impacts to oak woodlands along  
               riparian zones, near wetlands, and those that contain  
               snags, or that are near caves, cliffs and burrows that are  
               used by wildlife.

          6)Requires a county, after determining a project within its  
            jurisdiction will result in a conversion of oak woodlands that  








                                                                  SB 1334
                                                                  Page  4

            will have a significant effect on the environment, in the  
            course of preparing an EIR or mitigated negative declaration  
            to consider the following oak woodlands mitigation  
            alternatives:

             a)   Conserve in perpetuity, through the use of conservation  
               easements, two oak trees of the same species for each oak  
               tree that is removed; 

             b)   Restore former oak woodlands provided that at least  
               twice as many trees will be restored as the project  
               removes;

             c)   Contribute funds to the Oak Woodlands Conservation Fund  
               for the purpose of purchasing oak woodlands conservation  
               easements, as specified by the guidelines and criteria of  
               the Wildlife Conservation Board.  The amount of the  
               contribution shall be approximately equivalent to the cost  
               of implementing another mitigation alternative.

          7)Allows up to 20 percent of the total mitigation to be  
            mitigated by the planting of seedlings whereby the county  
            shall require the planting of three seedlings for each oak  
            tree that is removed provided that both conditions are met:

             a)   Requirements for the planting, care, maintenance,  
               monitoring and replanting of dead or diseased trees are  
               incorporated into mitigation; and,

             b)   The requirements to maintain the plantings and replace  
               dead or diseased trees does not expire for seven years.

          8)Allows the mitigation to occur on the site of a project or  
            within the county or as close to the project as is reasonably  
            practicable.

          9)Allows counties to use a grant awarded pursuant to the Oak Act  
            to prepare an oak conservation element for a general plan, an  
            oak protection ordinance or an oak woodlands management plan  
            or amendments that meet the requirements of this bill.

          10)Requires the oak woodlands management plan to exempt the  
            following activities:

             a)   The harvesting of fuelwood for noncommercial use by the  








                                                                  SB 1334
                                                                  Page  5

               landowner on the parcel of land from which it is harvested;

             b)   An approved Natural Community Conservation Plan or  
               approved sub-area plan within an approved Natural Community  
               Conservation Plan that includes oaks as covered species;

             c)   The removal of dead and diseased trees that pose  
               significant risks to life, property or to healthy trees; 

             d)   Projects within oak woodlands in which oak trees that  
               are not greater than 5 inches in diameter at breast height  
               are to be removed or projects that do not encroach up on  
               the drip-line of oak trees greater than 5 inches at breast  
               height;

             e)   Affordable housing projects for lower income households  
               that are located within an urbanized area or within a  
               sphere of influence; and, 

             f)   Projects that are subject to a regulatory program  
               certified by the Resource Secretary as a   functional  
               equivalent of CEQA.

          11)Does not require counties that already have ordinances in  
            effect prior to the effective date of this bill, to comply if  
            the county's mitigation ordinances are in substantial  
            conformance with this bill.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee analysis, approximately $25,000-$50,000 for the  
          Department of Fish & Game administration and minor, absorbable  
          costs for CDF consultation.

           COMMENTS  :

           1)Background  

          According to the author's office, California has lost more than  
            a million acres of oak woodlands since 1950, and more than 40%  
            of the total based on historic estimates. The conversion of  
            oak woodlands in California into residential ranchettes and  
            other developments has created an unprecedented threat to  
            California's signature landscapes.  

           2)Conversion Defined  








                                                                  SB 1334
                                                                  Page  6


          Conversion, with regard to oak woodlands, means changing land  
            uses to uses such as livestock grazing, vineyards and the  
            growing and harvesting of other commodities, and residential  
            and commercial development. Conversion generally results in  
            the removal of most or all the trees in the oak woodlands.  
            Conversion of oak woodlands is not currently subject to  CDF's  
            timberland conversion permit process. 

           3)Oak Woodlands  

          According to the CDF, there are about 10 million acres of oak  
            woodlands remaining in California. Though no comprehensive  
            data exist to track the statewide rate of oak woodlands  
            conversion, oak woodlands acreage has declined precipitously  
            over the past 30 years. Conversion is only one factor leading  
            to the decline in oak woodland acreage, however, since oak  
            tree stands in California are also susceptible to oak  
            regeneration problems and, in recent years, the spread of the  
            fungus that causes Sudden Oak Death.  Oak woodlands in  
            California have been divided into eight geographical regions  
            with the following acreage: North Coast (2.1 million);  
            Klamath/South Cascade (940,000); Modoc (5,000); Central Coast  
            (1.9 million); Southern California (590,000); Central Valley  
            (960,000); Sierra Nevada Foothills (2.1 million); and Sierra  
            Nevada (590,000). 

          According to the author's office, by 2040, it is predicted that  
            approximately 800,000 acres of hardwoods and approximately  
            600,000 acres of savanna (rangeland with trees at long  
            intervals) will be developed into housing with one or more  
            unit for each 20 acres.  Supporters argue the state is likely  
            to lose at least 14% of California's remaining hardwood  
            rangeland in the next 35 years to future vineyards and rural  
            subdivisions. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION, AS OF MAY 24, 2004  :

           Support 
           
          California League of Conservation Voters
          Defenders of Wildlife
          Natural Resources Defense Council
          Planning and Conservation League









                                                                  SB 1334
                                                                  Page  7

           Opposition 
           
          Agricultural Council of California
          Aliance for Habitat Conservation
          Association Generla Contractors
          Association of California Water Agencies
          California Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers Association
          California Association of REALTORS
          California Association of Winegrape Growers
          California Building Industry Association
          California Cattlemen's Association
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Farm Bureau
          California Grain and Feed Association
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association
          California State Association of Counties
          California Wool Growers Association
          Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California
          Contra Costa Water District
          Family Winemakers of California
          Forest Landowners of California
          Fresno County Farm Bureau
          Kern County Water Agency
          Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
          Lumber Association of California and Nevada
          Regional Council of Rural Counties
          Resources Landowners Coalition
          Transportation Corridor Agencies of Orange County


           Analysis Prepared by  :  Manuel Valencia / NAT. RES. / (916)  
          319-2092