BILL ANALYSIS
SB 1841
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 11, 2004
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Judy Chu, Chair
SB 1841 (Bowen) - As Amended: August 4, 2004
Policy Committee: Labor and
Employment Vote: 6-2
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill prohibits a public or private employer from engaging
in electronic monitoring of employee activities and
communications without first giving clear and conspicuous notice
to each employee. The notice may be electronic or in writing in
a manner reasonably calculated to provide actual notice and must
include the following information:
1)The form of communication or other activity to be monitored,
and
2)The kinds of information that will be obtained through the
monitoring.
This bill would not diminish any rights of employees granted
under federal, state or local law, or under any collective
bargaining agreement, if the law or agreement provides a greater
level of employee protection.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)No state fiscal impact. The bill conforms to current state
notice requirements.
2)Violations would constitute a misdemeanor; local law
enforcement costs not state-reimbursable.
COMMENTS
1)Background . Article 1 of the California Constitution provides
every California resident with a right to privacy. This right
SB 1841
Page 2
is enforceable through a private right of action when a
person's "reasonable expectation of privacy" is violated.
Additionally, current law requires employers to inform
employees when they listen in on employee telephone calls, and
disconnect once it is determined to be a personal call. The
State of California currently requires that all state
employees having access to the Internet consent that all
network activity is the property of the state and not private.
2)Purpose . This bill establishes the right to privacy for public
and private sector employees with regard to the monitoring of
their workplace activities and communications by their
employers. The bill does not prohibit monitoring, but requires
employers to notify employees about such monitoring.
3)Prior Legislation . Governor Davis vetoed two similar bills by
the same author in recent years - SB 1822 of 2000 and SB 1016
of 1999. Both bills prohibited an employer from secretly
monitoring the electronic mail or other computer records
generated by an employee. In vetoing these bills, the governor
expressed concern about placing undue regulatory burdens and
legal liabilities on business.
Analysis Prepared by : Stephen Shea / APPR. / (916) 319-2081