BILL ANALYSIS
AB 118
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 13, 2005
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Judy Chu, Chair
AB 118 (Cohn) - As Amended: March 29, 2005
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:9-0
(Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill:
1)Requires that if a criminal protective order exists, any
subsequent custody or visitation order between the same
parties must make reference to the criminal protective order.
2)Requires the Judicial Council to modify relevant court forms
by July 1, 2006.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable costs to the Judicial Council and the courts.
COMMENTS
Purpose . This bill is intended to ensure that a judge-when
issuing custody and visitation orders after a criminal
protective order involving the same parties is already in
place-properly considers the protective order by requiring
subsequent family law orders to specifically reference the
protective order.
The bill closes a loophole in the law that could permit a family
court judge who, while not aware of the criminal protective
order against one of the parties, issues a custody and
visitation order that the judge would not have issued were he or
she aware of the protective order. By requiring that any
subsequent custody and visitation order reference to the
criminal protective order, the judge must be made aware of the
protective order and, therefore, must consider it when making
AB 118
Page 2
custody and visitation determination.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081