BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 519|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
CONSENT
Bill No: AB 519
Author: Leno (D)
Amended: 3/30/05 in Assembly
Vote: 21
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE : 6-0, 6/7/05
AYES: Dunn, Morrow, Ackerman, Cedillo, Figueroa, Kuehl
NO VOTE RECORDED: Escutia
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 71-0, 4/7/05 (Passed on Consent) - See
last page for vote
SUBJECT : Parental rights: reinstatement after
termination
SOURCE : Judicial Council of California
Childrens Law Center of Los Angeles
DIGEST : This bill permits, under limited circumstances,
a child whose parents have had their rights terminated may
petition the court to have the rights reinstated.
Additionally, this bill provides the juvenile court the
authority to issue ex parte order protecting parents,
guardians, and caregivers even if an order protecting the
child is not being issued simultaneously.
ANALYSIS : Existing law provides that once parental
rights are terminated, the order is final and binding on
all parties and may only be attacked via a timely, direct
appeal. [Welfare and Institutions Code Section 366.26.]
CONTINUED
AB 519
Page
2
This bill provides that a child who has not been adopted
within three years after parental rights have been
terminated may petition the court to reinstate the parental
rights.
This bill provides that a child may petition for
reinstatement of parental rights sooner than three years if
all parties agree that the child is no longer adoptable.
This bill authorizes the juvenile court to reinstate
parental rights if it finds by a preponderance of the
evidence that the child is no longer likely to be adopted
and that reinstatement of parental rights is in the child's
best interest.
Existing law allows a juvenile court to issue an ex parte
order protecting a child.
Existing law allows a juvenile court to issue an ex parte
order protecting a parent, guardian, or caregiver
simultaneously with an ex parte order protecting a child.
This bill allows the juvenile court to issue an ex parte
order protecting a parent, guardian, or caregiver whether
or not the child also needs protecting.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 6/9/05)
Judicial Council of California (co-source)
Children's Law Center of Los Angeles (co-source)
County Welfare Directors Association of California
Family Law Section of the State Bar of California
Children's Advocacy Institute
National Center on Youth Law
Los Angeles Affiliate of the National Association of
Counsel for Children
Juvenile Court Judges of California
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT :
AB 519
Page
3
Reinstatement of Terminated Parental Rights
The Judicial Council of California and the Children's Law
Center of Los Angeles, co-sponsors of this bill, hail this
bill as an appropriate and reasonable solution to the
"legal orphan" problem that arises when a child has had his
or her parental rights terminated in anticipation of
adoption, but the adoption is never completed for some
reason. According to the author's office:
"California law provides no remedy for these children.
Adoption is the preferred placement plan for abused
and neglected children who cannot be reunified with
their parents. In order to free a child for adoption,
the juvenile court must terminate parental rights
based on a finding that the child is likely to be
adopted. The reality, however, is that older
children, children with special physical or emotional
needs, and children who are part of a sibling group
are often only likely to be adopted by a specific,
identified prospective parent. For too many of these
youth, after the court terminates parental rights, the
adoptive placements fail and these children end up
becoming legal orphans -- severed from all family
ties."
An October 2003 report by the California Department of
Social Services discloses that, as of July 30, 2002, there
were 5,846 legally freed children in the state not yet
placed in adoptive homes. Of these children, 913 no longer
had a case plan goal of adoption. The vast majority of
these children were living in long-term foster care. The
only remedy for these children under current California
law, laments the Children's Law Center of Los Angeles
(CLC), is a timely appeal of the termination order. And
even then, if an adoption has failed since the termination
order was issued, it may not be considered by the appellate
court. [See In re Zeth S. (2003) 31 Cal. 4th 396.]
CLC contends that children who are never adopted should not
have to suffer the permanent loss of their legal
relationships to their parents, siblings and other
relatives, including their rights to parental support and
AB 519
Page
4
to inherit from family members. Nor should they bear the
stigma of being labeled a legal orphan.
Ex Parte Orders Protecting Parents, Guardians and
Caregivers
The Judicial Council of California, co-sponsor of this
bill, asserts that while juvenile courts currently have the
ability to issue ex parte orders protecting parents,
guardians and caretakers if the court is simultaneously
issuing an order protecting the child, the court cannot
issue an order protecting the parent, guardian or caretaker
if the child is not also at risk.
"There are situations that arise where the parent or
the caregiver requires protection, but the child is not
at risk. In such cases the court needs the authority
to act in a timely manner to protect the family and
further the goal of reunification. Currently the court
must direct the party to another court to seek
protection; this change will streamline that process
and allow the juvenile court jurisdiction over all of
the issues relevant to the child and family whose
welfare it must oversee."
ASSEMBLY FLOOR :
AYES: Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Benoit, Berg,
Bermudez, Blakeslee, Bogh, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan,
Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Coto, Daucher, De La Torre,
DeVore, Dymally, Emmerson, Evans, Garcia, Goldberg,
Hancock, Harman, Haynes, Jerome Horton, Shirley Horton,
Houston, Huff, Jones, Karnette, Keene, Klehs, Koretz, La
Malfa, Laird, Leno, Leslie, Levine, Liu, Matthews, Maze,
McCarthy, Montanez, Mullin, Nakanishi, Nava, Negrete
McLeod, Niello, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Plescia, Sharon
Runner, Ruskin, Saldana, Salinas, Spitzer, Strickland,
Torrico, Tran, Vargas, Villines, Walters, Wolk, Wyland,
Yee, Nunez
NO VOTE RECORDED: Frommer, Gordon, La Suer, Lieber,
Mountjoy, Nation, Richman, Ridley-Thomas, Umberg
AB 519
Page
5
RJG:cm 6/9/05 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****