BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Kevin Murray, Chairman

                                           756 (Goldberg)
          
          Hearing Date:  8/7/06           Amended: 8/7/06
          Consultant:  Bob Franzoia       Policy Vote: Ed 8-2
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: AB 756 would establish the Flexible Funding for  
          Pupil Achievement Program for specified schools.  The bill  
          would:
          - Permit up to five percent of schools in the state to  
          participate at any one time.  The bill would require a school  
          district to adopt a five year participation agreement with a  
          participating school, except that the district would be required  
          to review the per student funding annually and perform other  
          oversight and enforcement functions.  Districts would be  
          permitted to retain up to ten percent of local funds for its  
          program costs.
          - Require a participating school to adopt a plan that addresses  
          the organization of the school, staffing, curriculum, and  
          classroom schedules as well as a budget, as specified.
          - Require the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI), by  
          3/30/2007, to adopt a distribution formula that would be used to  
          determine the allocation of district revenues for the use of  
          participating schools.
          - Require the SPI to request private foundations to fund and  
          conduct independent evaluations of the planning, operation and  
          effectiveness of the program.
          The bill would enact numerous other provisions to the local  
          program.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2006-07      2007-08       2008-09     Fund
           Flexible funding program          No new state costs; potential  
          redirections           Prop 98/
                                 program revenues between schools  
          withinlocal
                                 a school district                option

          SPI oversight          Up to $100 initially to track  
          participation          General
                                 against cap and to adopt distribution 










                                 formula                          
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: The bill provides that the SPI shall request  
          private foundations to fund and conduct independent evaluations  
          of the planning, implementation, operation, and effectiveness of  
          this program.  Staff notes the bill does not require the SPI to  
          evaluate any of the programs and it is not clear what occurs if  
          private foundations choose not to conduct such evaluations.   
          Absent evaluations, it is not clear how the Legislature can  
          determine within the first three years and every five years  
          after the effectiveness and benefits of providing participating  
          schools with this funding flexibility and whether to reauthorize  
          the program after 7/1/2017.  Further, if five percent of 8,000  
          schools participate in the program, evaluation costs will be  
          significant.  One option would be to strike the reference to  
          private foundations and instead directing the SPI to evaluate  
          the programs.  While this creates a General Fund cost, and staff  
          is hesitant to make any recommendation which increases the cost  
          of a bill, this may be preferable to creating a new program  
          whose evaluation is uncertain.
                                   - 1 -
          Page 2
          AB 756 (Goldberg)

          Chapter 276/2005 (SB 1053, Scott) established the Local  
          Improvement Program as a pilot project to provide participating  
          schools with flexibility in the development and implementation  
          of instructional programs to support and improve student  
          learning.  The program is limited to 15 school districts and  
          sunsets in 2010.  The SB 1053 workgroup timeline includes  
          issuing a letter of interest and application to the field by  
          10/1/2006.  Approval of applications by the State Board of  
          Education is not scheduled until 1/2007.  At this time, it  
          appears only one district has expressed interest in  
          participating.

          This bill is similar to AB 2152 (Goldberg) of 2004 which was  
          vetoed by the Governor with the following message:

          While I understand the author's intention to address categorical  
          programs, this bill actually limits the flexibility in the  
          allocation of funds to best meet the needs of schools at the  
          local level.  The bill dictates an allocation formula to local  
          districts, instead of allowing school boards the flexibility to  










          determine the allocation based on their specific needs.