BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 880 
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 880 (Cohn)
          As Amended April 20, 2005
          Majority vote 

           HUMAN SERVICES      5-2          APPROPRIATIONS     13-5        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Evans, Arambula, Bass,    |Ayes:|Chu, Bass, Berg,          |
          |     |Coto, Nation              |     |Calderon, Mullin,         |
          |     |                          |     |Karnette, Klehs, Leno,    |
          |     |                          |     |Nation, Oropeza,          |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Saldana,   |
          |     |                          |     |Yee                       |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Haynes, Spitzer           |Nays:|Sharon Runner, Emmerson,  |
          |     |                          |     |Haynes, Nakanishi,        |
          |     |                          |     |Walters                   |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires the California Department of Social Services  
          (DSS) in conjunction with stakeholders to draft guidelines  
          outlining best practices in the use of advanced technology to     
               assist counties in identifying all relatives, nonrelatives  
          and extended members at the earliest possible moment for the  
          foster child.

           FISCAL EFFECT  : According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor absorbable workload to DSS to draft the best  
          practice guidelines. 

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "(i)n California, eight  
          counties including:  Alameda County, Monterey County, Orange  
          County, Placer County, Sacramento County, Santa Clara County,  
          Stanislaus County, San Mateo County have voluntarily initiated  
          programs to provide the vital function of seeking to find a  
          foster child's relatives and nonrelative extended family members  
          using new advances in technology."  These advanced search  
          methods can serve to find family members who may agree to house  
          children who would otherwise be at risk of foster care  
          placement.  Relative homes offer stability to children in crisis  
          and enhance family reunification.  

          Through this bill, DSS may identify best practices as reported  








                                                                  AB 880 
                                                                  Page  2


          by the counties that are planning, designing, and implementing  
          strategies to prioritize the placement of children.  The  
          creation of public and private partnerships will be encouraged  
          and will enhance programs designed to quickly identify the  
          relative and nonrelative extended family members of children  
          placed in foster care.  


           Analysis Prepared by:   Caitlin O'Halloran / HUM. S. /  
          (916)-319-2089


                                                                FN: 0010299