BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1237
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 13, 2005

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                   Judy Chu, Chair

                 AB 1237 (Leno) - As Introduced:  February 22, 2005 

          Policy Committee:                              Public  
          SafetyVote:  5-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  
           
          This bill:

          1)Adds tasers, as defined, to the list of weapons that cannot be  
            manufactured, sold or possessed in California. Violation would  
            be an alternate felony/misdemeanor, punishable by 16 months,  
            2, or 3 years in state prison, or by up to one year in county  
            jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000.

          2)Exempts law enforcement officers from the prohibition on the  
            possession of tasers, when on duty and the use is authorized  
            by the law enforcement agency, and if the officer has  
            completed a taser training course via a Commission on Peace  
            Officer Standards and Training (POST) certified course.

          3)Requires all law enforcement agencies in California to report  
            monthly throughout 2006 to the Department of Justice (DOJ) on  
            a wide array of detailed information, including specific  
            statistics and circumstances for every time a taser is drawn,  
            aimed and fired. Required information includes:  reason for  
            use; manner of use; incident disposition; age, gender and race  
            of target; and evidence of substance abuse and/or mental  
            illness. 

          4)Requires law enforcement agencies to collect specified  
            information for 2006 and provide it to the DOJ by March 1,  
            2007.  Required information includes: the department's taser  
            protocols;  required training; frequency and disposition of  
            usage; ethnicity of taser targets, including comparisons with  
            arrest rates for all subjects arrested or cited during the  
            same time period; and taser injuries and deaths.








                                                                  AB 1237
                                                                  Page  2


          5)Requires DOJ, upon receiving the data from local law  
            enforcement, to collate the information and provide a  
            statewide report to the Legislature by July 1, 2007. 

           FISCAL EFFECT

           1)Significant reimbursable state-mandated GF costs to local law  
            enforcement agencies, likely in the range of several million  
            dollars, to manually collect detailed information and provide  
            it to DOJ. 

            Police and sheriff departments have been working with author  
            to revise reporting requirements to make them more expeditious  
            and cost-effective. For example, requiring quarterly reports  
            rather than monthly reports, and devising more of a check-list  
            approach than a narrative-oriented approach would reduce law  
            enforcement time and expense considerably.

          2)Unknown, potentially moderate costs for increased state  
            incarceration for unlawful sale or possession of a taser. In  
            2003-03 564 persons were committed to state prison for  
            unlawful possession of specified weapons. If this bill results  
            in five additional commitments, annual GF costs would be about  
            $150,000. 

          3)Moderate GF costs to DOJ, likely less than $150,000, for staff  
            to compile the information and issue the report. (DOJ  
            estimates its costs would be $300,000, which appears high.)   

           COMMENTS

          1)Rationale  . The author contends the use of tasers, by law  
            enforcement and the general public is increasing - in a void  
            of information regarding their safety. The intent of this  
            measure is to keep tasers out of the hands of the general  
            public and to collect detailed information about taser usage.   


            According to the author, "The opportunity for (taser) misuse  
            by the general public, is far greater than among our trained  
            law enforcement personnel. I believe that individuals may have  
            a false sense of security in obtaining and attempting to use a  
            taser for self-defense. The serious potential for abuse of  
            this powerful weapon requires that use be limited to law  








                                                                  AB 1237
                                                                  Page  3

            enforcement officers." 

           2)Current law  is generally silent on tasers.

           3)Related legislation  includes three bills pending in Assembly  
            Public Safety:  AB 157 (Levine) prohibits carrying a concealed  
            taser within a vehicle or upon the person; AB 101 (Cohn),  
            permits private ownership of tasers, requires tasers to bear  
            the name of the manufacturer and a serial number, and allows  
            DOJ to issue permits for non-self-defense use; and AB 1710  
            (Wyland), requires any seller of a taser to register  
            information with the taser manufacturer.  
           

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081