BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1261|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1261
Author: Leno (D)
Amended: 9/2/05 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE : 12-0, 6/15/05
AYES: Scott, Maldonado, Alquist, Denham, Dutton,
Lowenthal, Morrow, Romero, Simitian, Soto, Speier,
Torlakson
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE : 6-0, 06/28/05
AYES: Dunn, Morrow, Ackerman, Cedillo, Figueroa, Kuehl
NO VOTE RECORDED: Escutia
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 74-0, 5/19/05 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Foster children: education
SOURCE : Children's Law Center of Los Angeles
DIGEST : This bill clarifies and cleans up the provisions
of AB 490 (Steinberg), Chapter 862, Statutes of 2003,
addressing the educational needs of children in the foster
care system. It also reinstates language that was
inadvertently chaptered out of AB 1858 (Steinberg), Chapter
914, Statutes of 2004, by SB 722 (McPherson), Chapter 915,
Statutes of 2004.
CONTINUED
AB 1261
Page
2
Senate Floor Amendments of 9/2/05 delete the requirement
that a local education agency have in place a dispute
resolution process, as specified, and requires disputes to
be resolved in accordance with the existing dispute
resolution process available to any pupil served by the
local education agency.
ANALYSIS : Current law requires county offices of
education to make available information on educational
options for children residing in licensed children's
institutions to agencies placing children in licensed
children's institutions. Every agency that places a child
in a licensed children's institution is required to notify
the local education agency (LEA) at the time of the
placement, and the LEA is required to have a designated
staff person as the educational liaison for foster youth.
A pupil placed in a licensed children's institution or
foster family home is required to attend programs operated
by the LEA, except as specified. If a school placement
dispute arises, a foster youth has the right to remain in
the school that the foster child attended when permanently
housed or the school in which the foster child was last
enrolled.
Existing law sets forth the circumstances under which a
minor may be adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile
court and establishes procedures to determine temporary
placement of a dependent child. A juvenile court may limit
the right of a parent or guardian to make educational
decisions for his or her child that is adjudged a dependent
of the court and at the same time the court may appoint a
responsible adult to make educational decisions for the
child.
This bill clarifies the provisions related to the education
of foster youth in the areas of education placement,
coursework credit, records transfer, and education programs
offered to foster youth.
This bill:
1.Requires LEAs, if a dispute arises over the placement of
foster children, to resolve that dispute in accordance
with the existing dispute resolution process available
AB 1261
Page
3
to any pupil served by the LEA.
2.Revises the circumstances under which a student placed
in a licensed children's institute or foster family home
attends programs operated by a LEA.
3.Defines "pupil in foster care" for the purpose of
coordinating between the LEA and placement agency for
the proper transfer between schools of pupils in foster
care.
4.Adds nonpublic, nonsectarian schools to the list of
schools for which development of an alternative
accountability system is required.
5.Revises the definition of "nonpublic, nonsectarian
school" by deleting the specifications that the school
employs at least one full-time teacher who holds an
appropriate credential authorizing special education
services.
6.Provides that if an applicant does not receive a
response on a renewal application from the LEA within
specified time periods, the applicant may file the
application with the Superintendent of Public
Instruction.
7.Revises the timeline for the SPI to conduct an
additional onsite review of a facility and program
seeking certification from four to within three years of
the effective date of certification.
8.Authorizes the court to temporarily limit the right of
the parent to make educational decisions for the child
and to temporarily appoint a responsible adult to make
education decisions for the child if specified
conditions are found.
9.Authorizes the court to make educational decisions for
the child if the court cannot identify a responsible
adult to make educational decisions for the child, the
appointment of a surrogate parent is not warranted,
there is o foster parent to exercise the appropriate
authority, and to issue appropriate orders to ensure
AB 1261
Page
4
that every effort is made to identify a responsible
adult to make future educational decisions for the
child.
10.Requires county welfare departments, at any hearing to
terminate jurisdiction over a dependent child who has
reached the age of majority to include a health and
education summary in a specified report.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: Yes
SUPPORT : (Verified 8/16/05)
Children's Law Center of Los Angeles (source)
National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter
Juvenile Court Judges of California
California Coalition for Youth
Family Law Section of the State Bar of California
National Center for Youth Law
Inter-Agency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect
American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees
Protection & Advocacy, Inc.
Gay and Lesbian Adolescent Social Services, Inc.
California Alliance of Child and Family Services
ASSEMBLY FLOOR :
AYES: Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Berg, Bermudez,
Blakeslee, Bogh, Canciamilla, Chan, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn,
Coto, Daucher, De La Torre, DeVore, Dymally, Emmerson,
Evans, Frommer, Goldberg, Hancock, Harman, Haynes, Jerome
Horton, Shirley Horton, Houston, Huff, Jones, Karnette,
Keene, Klehs, Koretz, La Malfa, La Suer, Laird, Leno,
Leslie, Levine, Lieber, Matthews, Maze, McCarthy,
Montanez, Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi, Nation, Nava,
Negrete McLeod, Niello, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Plescia,
Richman, Ridley-Thomas, Sharon Runner, Ruskin, Saldana,
Salinas, Spitzer, Strickland, Torrico, Tran, Umberg,
Vargas, Villines, Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee, Nunez
NO VOTE RECORDED: Benoit, Calderon, Chavez, Garcia,
Gordon, Liu
AB 1261
Page
5
NC:cm 9/3/05 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****