BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1288
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 27, 2005
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Judy Chu, Chair
AB 1288 (Chu) - As Amended: April 4, 2005
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 6-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill:
1)Provides that if a court has not issued a protective order in
a case in a domestic violence case, as specified, the court on
its own motion shall issue a protective order, upon a good
cause belief that a victim or witness may suffer harm from the
defendant, prohibiting the defendant from possessing a gun
while the protective order is in effect and requiring the
defendant to relinquish any guns that he or she possesses, as
specified.
2)Authorizes law enforcement to advise domestic violence victims
who have protective orders in effect, or whose abusers have
been arraigned or are serving a sentence for domestic
violence, whether the accused/convicted abuser owns a gun.
(This information exists in a Department of Justice (DOJ)
database.)
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Minor costs to the state trial courts as a result of requiring
the court to issue additional protective orders.
2)Minor, nonreimbursable costs to local law enforcement to let
domestic violence victims know if their alleged or convicted
abuser possesses a gun.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . If a prosecutor obtains a protective order that
AB 1288
Page 2
requires a domestic violence defendant to stay away from the
alleged victim, the court must automatically, without
exception, direct the defendant to relinquish any guns. But
if the prosecutor does not seek, or fails to obtain, a
protective order - and this frequently happens, often because
the defendant and victim live together - then the court lacks
authority to issue a gun prohibition.
Given the frequency with which guns are used against domestic
violence victims, this bill requires the court to issue such
an order if there is a good cause to believe that harm has
occurred or will occur, the same standard of belief used for
obtaining protective orders.
2)This bill requires, rather than authorizes the court to issue
an order . Generally, the court is authorized to issue
protective orders; this bill requires a protective order
prohibiting possession of a gun in cases where the court has
not exercised its authority to issue a protective order, which
would prohibit possession of a gun.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081