BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1391
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 13, 2005
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Judy Chu, Chair
AB 1391 (Leno) - As Amended: March 29, 2005
Policy Committee: ElectionsVote:6-0
(Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill requires that any general purpose committee determine,
for registration and reporting requirements, whether it is a
state, county, or city general purpose committee based on where
the committee makes a majority of its contributions and
independent expenditures.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible fiscal impact to the Fair Political Practices
Commission (FPPC).
COMMENTS
Purpose . General purpose committees are defined as those formed
to support more than one candidate or ballot measure. According
to the author, AB 1391, which is sponsored by the FPPC, closes a
loophole in state reporting requirements by clarifying the
definition of state, county, and city general purpose
committees.
The author states, "Currently a general purpose committee may
register as a state committee if it is involved in a state
election. As a state committee, it must follow state disclosure
requirements and deadlines. However, if the state committee
decides to heavily participate in a city or county election, it
does not need to follow city or county disclosure regulations.
There have been incidents of general purpose committees skirting
local regulations by registering as a state committee. As a
result, there is less opportunity for campaign finance
transparency on the local level.
AB 1391
Page 2
"By setting out definitive contribution thresholds, AB 1391
clarifies the distinction between committees and prevents a
state committee from funneling a majority of funds to a local
committee without local disclosure."
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081