BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1412
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1412 (Leno)
          As Amended May 27, 2005
          Majority vote 

           HUMAN SERVICES      6-0         JUDICIARY           6-3         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Evans, Arambula, Bass,    |Ayes:|Jones, Berg, Laird,       |
          |     |Coto, Nation, Spitzer     |     |Levine, Lieber, Monta?ez  |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Harman, Haynes, Leslie    |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           APPROPRIATIONS      13-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chu, Bass, Berg,          |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Mullin,         |     |                          |
          |     |Karnette, Klehs, Leno,    |     |                          |
          |     |Nation, Oropeza,          |     |                          |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Saldana,   |     |                          |
          |     |Yee                       |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Sharon Runner, Emmerson,  |     |                          |
          |     |Haynes, Nakanishi,        |     |                          |
          |     |Walters                   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Specifies a phased-in expansion of the requirement  
          that county child welfare workers ask every child in foster care  
          who is 10 years of age or older and who has been in and out of  
          home placement for six or months or longer, about important  
          adult relationships and to make efforts to support those  
          relationships.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Creates a phased-in expansion of the requirement that county  
            child welfare workers ask children 10 years of age or older,  
            beginning with those children placed with a nonrelative, about  
            important adult relationships and to make efforts to support  
            those relationships.








                                                                  AB 1412
                                                                  Page  2



          2)Requires that implementation and operation of this bill be  
            subject to an appropriation of the budget process.

          3)Requires a court to determine whether the agency has made  
            reasonable efforts to maintain the child's relationships with  
            individuals other than the child's siblings who are important  
            to the child consistent with the child's best interests.

          4)Specifies that every foster child has the right to be involved  
            in the development of his or her case plan and plan for  
            permanent placement.

          5)Allows foster children 12-years of age or older to review  
            their own case plan.

          6)Includes the foster child as part of a team working on their  
            case plan.

          7)Requires that a child's case plan include a statement of the  
            child's wishes regarding their permanent placement plan and an  
            assessment of those stated wishes.

          8)Seeks to ensure that children and youth are actively involved  
            in the case plan and permanency planning process.

          9)Makes various findings and declarations regarding the value  
            and necessity of a case plan for each foster child.

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Requires county child welfare workers to ask every child 10  
            years of age or older who has been placed in a group home for  
            six or months or longer, about important adult relationships  
            and to make efforts to support those relationships.

          2)Requires a court to determine whether the agency has made  
            reasonable efforts to maintain the identified relationships of  
            a child 10 years of age or older, living in a group home for  
            six months or more, with individuals other than the child's  
            siblings who are important to the child consistent with the  
            child's best interests.

          3)Allows a foster child to review his or her own case plan if he  








                                                                  AB 1412
                                                                  Page  3


            or she is over 12 years of age
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee analysis, annual costs of less than $800,000 [$350,000  
          General Fund (GF)] for an increased workload for social workers,  
          annual costs of less than $870,000 ($380,000 GF) for social  
          workers to include eligible children to participate in the  
          development of their case plans, and unknown off-setting savings  
          to the extent this bill reduces children's time in foster care  
          via adoption or reduces reliance on public benefits when foster  
          youth exit care as  young adults. 

           COMMENTS  :  This bill expands on AB 408 (Steinberg) Chapter 813,  
          Statutes of 2003, which provides foster youth aged 10 and older  
          living in group homes the opportunity to identify and benefit  
          from appropriate adult relationships.  AB 408 made  
          ground-breaking changes in dependency law to help achieve  
          permanency for older foster youth.  Among other important  
          changes, state law now allows a minor 10 years of age to be  
          notified of their own juvenile court hearing; and to participate  
          in age-appropriate extracurricular enrichment and social  
          activities.

          According to the author, "(t)here is a pervasive myth that no  
          one wants to adopt or form a lifelong commitment with older  
          children.  This myth permeates social work practices, dependency  
          court practices and is accepted by the general public.  In  
          California, social workers often focus permanency efforts on  
          younger children even though over half of the children in foster  
          care are over the age of 11 and will remain in foster care for  
          the majority of their childhood."

          AB 408 shifts the traditional assumption that foster youth over  
          10 were not adoptable and that foster youth should not be  
          directly involved in their own case planning.  The bill also  
          required the state to encourage the development of approaches to  
          ensure that no child leaves foster care without a lifelong  
          connection to a committed adult and requires social workers to  
          be trained to assist in identifying and maintaining child  
          relationships with important individuals.

          Other legislation: AB 2651 (Chu) of 2002 which was vetoed, and  
          SB 1639 (Alarcon) Chapter 668, Statutes of 2004, outlines and  
          improves on a foster care bill of rights ensuring that all youth  








                                                                  AB 1412
                                                                  Page  4


          in foster care live in a safe home, are free from sexual abuse  
          and may contact their siblings unless they are prohibited by the  
          court order.

          The County Welfare Director's Association of California (CWDA)  
          agrees that relationships between foster youth and adults other  
          than their parents or caregivers can be "meaningful," and as  
          with the most recent amendments they are in support of this  
          bill.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Caitlin O'Halloran / HUM. S. / (916)  
          319-2089 



                                                                FN: 0010904