BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2031
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2031 (Cohn)
          As Amended March 29, 2006
          Majority vote 

           HUMAN SERVICES      6-0         APPROPRIATIONS                  
                                             (vote not available)
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Evans,Arambula, Bass,     |     |                          |
          |     |Coto, Nation, Spitzer     |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Requires the California Department of Social Services  
          (DSS) in conjunction with stakeholders to draft guidelines  
          outlining best practices in the use of advanced technology to  
          assist counties in identifying all relatives and  
          nonrelative-extended family members for foster youth.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Expands current law by requiring the state to encourage the  
            development of approaches that include ensuring that a search  
            for the relatives of foster youth is initiated before  
            placement decisions are made for children who are unable to be  
            reunited with their families.

          2)Requires DSS in conjunction with the California Youth  
            Connection, the County Welfare Directors Association, and the  
            California Alliance of Child and Family Services among others  
            to draft guidelines outlining best practices in the use of  
            advanced technology to assist counties in identifying all  
            relatives and non-relative extended family members at the  
            earliest possible time for a foster child. 

          3)Makes findings and declarations noting that eight counties in  
            California have initiated programs to use advanced technology  
            to find the extended families of foster youth.

          4)Specifies that while the Legislature supports reunification of  
            families when it can be safely accomplished, the search for  
            permanent homes with relatives should be initiated before  
            placement decisions are made for children who cannot return to  








                                                                  AB 2031
                                                                  Page  2


            their biological families.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee analysis, this bill has minor absorbable workload  
          costs to allow DSS to draft the best practice guidelines. 
           
          COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "far too many children are  
          placed with strangers or in group homes due to the difficulty of  
          finding available relatives for the purposes of adoption,  
          relative care-giving or an established connection to the youth's  
          immediate family.  As a result these youth experience emotional  
          trauma, inadequate education, homelessness and often criminal  
          behavior."

          Outcome data from Washington and Illinois show that children in  
          the care of relatives are less likely to enter state custody,  
          and most of the arrangements do not require intensive  
          supervision of the placement by the courts or by the department  
          of social services.  

          Last year a nearly identical measure, AB 880 (Cohn) passed  
          through both houses but was vetoed by the Governor.  In his veto  
          message, the Governor said, among other things "the bill does  
          not provide resources to develop the cost benefit analysis of  
          using locator technology."

          The author reports that there have been recent conversations  
          with the Administration and now believes that as a result of the  
          March 20, 2006 amendments removing the section of the bill that  
          required a cost benefit analysis the Governor will likely sign  
          the bill.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Caitlin O'Halloran / HUM. S. / (916)  
          319-2089 



                                                                FN: 0014917