BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    

                                SUSPENSE - VOTE ONLY
            

            SENATE REVENUE & TAXATION COMMITTEE

            Senator Michael J. Machado, Chair

                                                  AB 2533 - Leno

                                             Amended: April 17, 2006

                                                                       

            Hearing: June 28, 2006 Tax Levy      Fiscal: Yes


            SUBJECT:  Expands the sales and use tax exemption for  
                      original works of art under specific  
                      circumstances.

            EXISTING LAW 

            Provides an exemption for sales of original works of art  
            which are purchased by:

                   A governmental entity or any nonprofit organization  
                 operating a museum under contract for a governmental  
                 entity.

                   A nonprofit organization, qualified for exemption  
                 from state income tax that purchased the work of art  
                 for display in a museum open to the public, as  
                 specified, either operated by the purchaser or another  
                 nonprofit organization qualified for exemption.

                   Any person donating to the above governmental  
                 entity or nonprofit organizations.  The transfer must  
                 occur and be documented as specified.

            In general, the exemption provided to the above described  
            governmental entity or nonprofit organizations, applies  
            only to original works of art which are purchased to become  
            part of the permanent collection of either a museum, a  
            qualified nonprofit organization that is required to loan  
            out its art for display to museums, or a governmental  
            entity which purchases or commissions art for display in  
            public places. 








                                                            AB 2533-Leno

                                                                  Page 3

            Exempts purchases of museum pieces only for:

                   San Diego Aero-Space Museum 

                   California Science Center

                   Purchases of display pieces replaced due to  
                 destruction by calamity

            Defines original works of art by the BOE as: "tangible  
            personal property which has been created as a unique object  
            intended to provide aesthetic pleasure to the beholder  
            and/or to express the emotions of the artist."  The form of  
            this art includes but is not limited to: visual art, a work  
            of calligraphy, a work of graphic art, crafts, or mixed  
            media.  



            THIS BILL 

            Exempts from the sales and use tax the lease of original  
            works of art, if both the lessor and lessee are nonprofit  
            organizations qualified for exemption from state income  
            tax.  Provides that in order for the art collection to be  
            considered part of the permanent collection of the lessee  
            the lease term must be at least 35 years.

            Provides that the exemption would apply to works of art  
            that are purchased and become part of the permanent  
            collection of a governmental entity that leases from  
            another governmental entity art for public display.

            Clarifies that purchases of clothing, costumes, dresses,  
            and personal adornment that are works of art and would be  
            exempt from tax.




            FISCAL EFFECT: 

            The BOE only estimates the revenue loss for one location  








                                                            AB 2533-Leno

                                                                  Page 3
            pursuant to an agreement.  The following is the estimate  
            for the city and county of San Francisco.  As noted below,  
            the revenue loss would grow due to expected contracts in  
            other cities and counties.

            $3.5 million x 8.5% Tax Rate in San Francisco County =  
            $297,500

                   -------------------------- 
                  |       |Revenue   |       |
                  |       |Loss      |       |
                  |       |          |       |
                  |       |          |       |
                  |       |          |       |
                  |-------+----------+-------|
                  |Year 1 | $        |       |
                  |       | 38,250   |       |
                  |       |          |       |
                  |-------+----------+-------|
                  |Year 2 |          |       |
                  |       |  29,750  |       |
                  |       |          |       |
                  |-------+----------+-------|
                  |Year 3 |          |       |
                  |       |  25,500  |       |
                  |       |          |       |
                  |-------+----------+-------|
                  |Year   |          |each   |
                  |4-15   |  17,000  |year   |
                  |       |          |       |
                  |-------+----------+-------|
                  |       | $        |       |
                  |       |297,500   |       |
                  |       |          |       |
                   -------------------------- 
            One of the stated goals of the agreement in the above  
            example is to establish a model for future lease  
            agreements.  It is reasonable to assume that future revenue  
            impacts would be based on each specific lease agreement.   
            Therefore, it is difficult to estimate with any certainty,  
            the revenue impact of future agreements of this kind.


            COMMENTS:








                                                            AB 2533-Leno

                                                                  Page 3


            A.   Purpose of the bill

            The sponsor of the amendment is the California Historical  
            Society.  The purpose of this measure is to allow leases of  
            works of art, including dresses and costumes, between  
            certain nonprofit organizations to be exempt from tax.  The  
            leases will be based on a collection sharing agreement, of  
            not less than 35 years, that allows museums to share parts  
            of their art collections that may not be on display, due to  
            the size of the museum, type of collection, or for other  
            reasons, and share them with museums with larger space or  
            similar collections.  Structured as a lease, these sharing  
            agreements allow the nonprofit organizations to retain  
            title to their pieces while generating funds to support  
            other exhibits and programs, provide continuing educational  
            material, and enhance the overall enjoyment and  
            appreciation of art.

            

            B.What transactions are currently exempt?  

            The Board has made previous determinations regarding what  
            constitutes a work of art.  One annotation suggests that a  
            utilitarian object, such as a dress, could be considered to  
            be a work of art if it is an original work designed to have  
            significant artistic value.  It must be hand-crafted by, or  
            under the direction of, an artist or master craftsman,  
            rather than mass produced.  If the aesthetic value of the  
            dress is greater than the practical value, then it may be  
            considered a work of art due to its uniqueness and extra  
            effort to "provide aesthetic pleasure to the beholder  
            and/or to express the emotions of the artist."   
            Additionally, the Board has decided that tangible personal  
            property used by an artist in an "assemblage" was  
            considered to be "mixed media," and exempt as an original  
            work of art.  Depending on the exhibit, it is possible for  
            a dress to be exempt if part of an assemblage.  According  
            to the sponsor of this bill, most of the pieces involved in  
            the collection sharing agreement are from the 19th and  
            early 20th century.  









                                                            AB 2533-Leno

                                                                  Page 3
            C.Clothing that has historical value.  

            A lease or purchase of historical clothing that has  
            historical value may still not be exempt from the Sales and  
            Use Tax Law.  The exemption provided by section 6365 is  
            intended to cover a work of art and is not a blanket  
            coverage of all items purchased or leased by a museum.  In  
            other words, any dress, costume, or clothing must first  
            meet the definition of an original work of art.

            


            Support and Opposition

                 Support:California Historical Society

                        California Association of Museums


            ---------------------------------

            Consultant: Colin Grinnell

            06/27/06 10:06