BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2858|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2858
          Author:   Leno (D)
          Amended:  5/10/06 in Assembly
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 6/27/06
          AYES:  Migden, Poochigian, Cedillo, Margett, Perata, Romero

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8 

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  80-0, 5/31/06 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Trials:  mental competence:  defendant

           SOURCE  :     San Francisco District Attorneys Office
                      California District Attorneys Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill is to provide for notice to the  
          defense attorney, sheriff and district attorney if a  
          defendant found mentally incompetent to stand trial on a  
          violent felony is placed on outpatient status and provides  
          for notice to those same people when there is the  
          initiation of the conservatorship and provide that the  
          court shall not appoint a conservator if it will not result  
          in adequate protection of the public.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law has specified procedures when a  
          defendant's mental competence to stand trial is questioned.

          Existing law provides that if a defendant is found mentally  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2858
                                                                Page  
          2

          incompetent, the trial or judgment shall be suspended until  
          the person becomes mentally competent.

          Existing law provides that a defendant charged with a  
          violent felony may not be delivered to a state hospital or  
          treatment facility unless the sate hospital or treatment  
          facility has a secured perimeter or locked and controlled  
          treatment facility, and the judge determines that the  
          public safety will be protected.  

          Existing law provides that a defendant charged with a  
          violent felony may be placed on outpatient status only if  
          the court finds that the placement will not pose a danger  
          to the health or safety of others

          This bill provides that if the court places a defendant  
          charged with a violent felony on outpatient status the  
          court must serve copies of the placement order on defense  
          counsel, the sheriff in the county where the defendant will  
          be placed, and the district attorney for the county in  
          which the violent felony charges are pending against the  
          defendant.

          Existing law states the criminal action remains subject to  
          dismissal in the interest of justice.  If the criminal  
          action is dismissed, the court shall transmit a copy of the  
          order of dismissal to the community program director or a  
          designee

          Existing law specifies that if the criminal charge against  
          the defendant is dismissed, the defendant shall be released  
          from any commitment ordered under this section, but without  
          prejudice to the initiation of any proceedings that may be  
          appropriate under existing law).

          Existing law provides at the end of three years from the  
          date of commitment or a period of commitment equal to the  
          maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most  
          serious offense charged in the information, indictment, or  
          misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter, a defendant  
          who has not recovered mental competence shall be returned  
          to the committing court.  The court shall notify the  
          community program director or a designee of the return and  
          of any resulting court orders.







                                                               AB 2858
                                                                Page  
          3


          Existing law states whenever any defendant is returned to  
          the court pursuant to existing law and it appears to the  
          court that the defendant is gravely disabled, as specified,  
          the court shall order the conservatorship investigator of  
          the county of commitment of the defendant to initiate  
          conservatorship proceedings for the defendant.  Any  
          hearings required in the conservatorship proceedings shall  
          be held in the superior court in the county that ordered  
          the commitment.  The court shall transmit a copy of the  
          order directing initiation of conservatorship proceedings  
          to the community program director or a designee and shall  
          notify the community program director or a designee of the  
          outcome of the proceedings.

          This bill provides instead that the court shall transmit a  
          copy of the order directing initiation of conservatorship  
          proceedings to the community program director or a  
          designee, the sheriff and the district attorney of the  
          county in which criminal charges are pending, and the  
          defendant's counsel of record.  The court shall notify the  
          community program director or a designee and the sheriff  
          and district attorney of the county in which criminal  
          charges are pending, and the defendant's counsel of record  
          of the outcome of the conservatorship proceedings.

          This bill provides that if a change in placement is  
          proposed for a defendant who is committed the court shall  
          provide notice and an opportunity to be heard with respect  
          to the proposed placement of the defendant to the sheriff  
          and the district attorney of the county in which criminal  
          charges are pending.

          Existing law requires that, where the defendant is confined  
          in a treatment facility, a copy of any report to the  
          committing court regarding the defendant's progress toward  
          recovery of mental competence shall be provided by the  
          committing court to the prosecutor and to the defense  
          counsel.  

          Existing law states a conservator of the person, of the  
          estate, or of the person and the estate may be appointed  
          for any person who is gravely disabled as a result of  
          mental disorder or impairment by chronic alcoholism.  The  







                                                               AB 2858
                                                                Page  
          4

          procedure for establishing, administering, and terminating  
          a conservatorship under this chapter shall be the same as  
          that provided in existing law, except as follows:

           1.A conservator may be appointed for a gravely disabled  
            minor.

           2.Appointment of a conservator under this part, including  
            the appointment of a conservator for a person who is  
            gravely disabled, as specified, unless the officer  
            providing conservatorship investigation recommends  
            otherwise to the superior court.

           3.In appointing a conservator, as defined in current law,  
            the court shall consider the purposes of protection of  
            the public and the treatment of the conservatee.

          Existing law specifies that no conservatorship of the  
          estate pursuant to this chapter shall be established if a  
          conservatorship or guardianship of the estate exists under  
          the Probate Code.  When a gravely disabled person already  
          has a guardian or conservator of the person appointed under  
          the Probate Code, the proceedings under this chapter shall  
          not terminate the prior proceedings but shall be concurrent  
          with and superior thereto.  The superior court may appoint  
          the existing guardian or conservator of the person or  
          another person as conservator of the person under this  
          chapter.

          Existing law requires the person for whom conservatorship  
          is sought have the right to demand a court or jury trial on  
          the issue whether he or she is gravely disabled.  Demand  
          for court or jury trial shall be made within five days  
          following the hearing on the conservatorship petition.  If  
          the proposed conservatee demands a court or jury trial  
          before the date of the hearing as provided for in existing  
          law, the demand shall constitute a waiver of the hearing.   
          The court or jury trial shall commence within 10 days of  
          the date of the demand, except that the court shall  
          continue the trial date for a period not to exceed 15 days  
          upon the request of counsel for the proposed conservatee.   
          This right shall also apply in subsequent proceedings to  
          reestablish conservatorship. 








                                                               AB 2858
                                                                Page  
          5

          This bill provides that notwithstanding any other provision  
          the court shall not appoint the proposed conservator if the  
          court determines that appointment of the proposed  
          conservator will not result in adequate protection of the  
          public.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/10/06)

          San Francisco District Attorney's Office
          California District Attorneys Association


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          under existing law, dangerous, mentally ill persons charged  
          with rape and murder could potentially be released into the  
          community.  Once declared incompetent to stand trial,  
          defendants are treated to restore competency to stand trial  
          for a three-year maximum period of commitment after which  
          they are transferred into the county mental health system,  
          where they slip through the cracks.

          This bill closes a troubling loophole in the law by  
          providing notice to prosecutors and public safety agencies  
          when a defendant charged with a violent felony is placed on  
          outpatient status; when the conservatorship proceedings are  
          initiated and concluded; and when a change in placement is  
          proposed for a defendant in a "Murphy" conservatorship.

          This bill also provides prosecutors an opportunity to be  
          heard with respect to a proposed change in placement for a  
          defendant in a "Murphy" conservatorship and also requires  
          the court to determine whether the proposed conservator  
          would adequately protect public safety in supervising the  
          defendant.

          This bill will ensure that public safety officials are  
          given meaningful notice and an opportunity to provide input  
          in critical proceedings concerning mentally incompetent  
          defendants.









                                                               AB 2858
                                                                Page  
          6

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Benoit, Berg,  
            Bermudez, Blakeslee, Bogh, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan,  
            Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Coto, Daucher, De La Torre,  
            DeVore, Dymally, Emmerson, Evans, Frommer, Garcia,  
            Goldberg, Hancock, Harman, Haynes, Jerome Horton, Shirley  
            Horton, Houston, Huff, Jones, Karnette, Keene, Klehs,  
            Koretz, La Malfa, La Suer, Laird, Leno, Leslie, Levine,  
            Lieber, Lieu, Liu, Matthews, Maze, McCarthy, Montanez,  
            Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi, Nation, Nava, Negrete  
            McLeod, Niello, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Plescia, Richman,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Sharon Runner, Ruskin, Saldana, Salinas,  
            Spitzer, Strickland, Torrico, Tran, Umberg, Vargas,  
            Villines, Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee, Nunez


          RJG:do  8/10/06   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****