BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 302|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 302
          Author:   Scott (D), et al
          Amended:  8/15/05
          Vote:     27 - Urgency

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 4/26/05
          AYES:  Dunn, Ackerman, Cedillo, Escutia, Figueroa, Kuehl
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Morrow

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           SENATE FLOOR  :  40-0, 5/31/05
          AYES: Aanestad, Ackerman, Alarcon, Alquist, Ashburn,  
            Battin, Bowen, Campbell, Cedillo, Chesbro, Cox, Denham,  
            Ducheny, Dunn, Dutton, Escutia, Figueroa, Florez,  
            Hollingsworth, Kehoe, Kuehl, Lowenthal, Machado,  
            Maldonado, Margett, McClintock, Migden, Morrow, Murray,  
            Ortiz, Perata, Poochigian, Romero, Runner, Scott,  
            Simitian, Soto, Speier, Torlakson, Vincent

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 8/25/05 (Passed on Consent) - See  
            last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Adoption

           SOURCE  :     Academy of California Adoption Lawyers


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes various changes to statutes  
          relating to adoptions.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 302
                                                                Page  
          2

           Assembly Amendments  made clarifying changes and deleted the  
          specified 75 days prior to hearing notice requirement, and  
          added an urgency clause and co-authors.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides that a man may be a  
          presumed father if certain conditions are met, and provides  
          that this presumption of a father-child relationship may be  
          rebutted.

          Existing law provides that a child, the child's natural  
          mother, or a presumed father may bring an action to  
          determine whether there exists a father-child relationship  
          or not.

          This bill permits an adoption agency to whom the child has  
          been or is proposed to be relinquished, or a person who is  
          a prospective adoptive parent, to bring an action to  
          establish paternity or for the purpose of declaring the  
          nonexistence of the father-child relationship.

          Existing law provides that an action to determine a parent  
          and child relationship may be brought in the county in  
          which a child resides or is found, or, if the father is  
          deceased, in the county in which probate proceedings for  
          probate of his estate have been or could be commenced.

          This bill expands the provision governing venue for an  
          action to determine a parent and child relationship by  
          additionally authorizing that action to be brought in the  
          county in which a license California adoption agency  
          maintains an office if the agency brings the action.

          Existing law generally provides that where a birth mother  
          has relinquished for, or consents to an adoption, a child  
          having a presumed father may not be adopted without the  
          presumed father's consent, if living.

          This bill provides that the consent of a presumed father is  
          not required for the child to be adopted, unless he became  
          a presumed father before the mother's relinquishment or  
          consent to adoption of the child became irrevocable, or  
          before the mother's parental rights have been terminated.

          Existing law requires, in a step parent adoption, the  







                                                                SB 302
                                                                Page  
          3

          consent of either or both birth parents to be signed before  
          the court clerk, probation officer, qualified court  
          investigator, or county welfare department employee, who  
          shall immediately file the consent with the clerk of the  
          court where the adoption petition is filed.

          Existing law permits the consent by a birth parent who is  
          outside this state to be signed before a notary or other  
          person authorized to perform notarial acts.

          This bill permits the signing of the consent by either or  
          both birth parents, in a step parent adoption, to be  
          acknowledged by a notary public.

          Existing law specifies the procedure to be followed, and  
          the persons to whom notice must be given, for a hearing to  
          terminate parental rights to a dependent child.  The  
          hearing on termination of parental rights usually precedes  
          the permanent placement of the child, whether into adoption  
          or guardianship.

          This bill authorizes the court to order publication of the  
          notice to terminate parental rights to any unknown parent,  
          as specified.

          The bill provides that if the identity of one or both of  
          the parents of the child is unknown, or the name of one or  
          both of the parents is uncertain then that fact shall be  
          set forth, in the affidavit and the court shall issue an  
          order dispensing with notice to a natural parent or  
          possible natural parent under this section if, after  
          inquiry and a determination that there has been due  
          diligence in attempting to identify the unknown parent, the  
          court is unable to identify the natural parent and no  
          person has appeared claiming to be the natural parent.

          After a determination that there has been due diligence in  
          attempting to identify an unknown parent the court shall  
          consider whether publication notice would be likely to lead  
          to actual notice to the unknown parent.  The court may  
          order publication notice if, on the basis of all  
          information before the court, the court determines that  
          notice by publication is likely to lead to actual notice to  
          the parent.  If publication notice to an unknown parent is  







                                                                SB 302
                                                                Page  
          4

          ordered, the court shall order the published citation to be  
          directed to either the father or mother, or both, of the  
          child, and to all persons claiming to be the father or  
          mother of the child, naming and otherwise describing the  
          child.  An order of publication shall be based on an  
          affidavit describing efforts made to identify the unknown  
          parent or parents.  Service made by shall require the  
          unknown parent or parents to appear at the date, time, and  
          place stated in the citation.  Publication shall be made  
          once a week for four consecutive weeks.

          This bill provides that if the court determines that these  
          has been due diligence in attempting to identify one or  
          both of the parents, or alleged parents, of the child and  
          the probation office or social workers recommends legal  
          guardianship or long-term foster care, no further notice to  
          the parent is required.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/25/05)

          Academy of California Adoption Lawyers (source)


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The sponsor of this bill, the  
          Academy of California Adoption Lawyers (ACAL), states that  
          this bill addresses some technical and some unresolved  
          legal issues relating to the process of adoptions.

          This is ACAL's annual "technical cleanup bill" to make  
          substantive changes in the law to facilitate the adoption  
          process.  The issues that the sponsor determined to address  
          in this bill have arisen in the field, and reflect the  
          solutions offered by practitioners in this specialized  
          area.

          According to the author's office, current law allows birth  
          fathers to step forward very late in the adoption process  
          (after birth mother's consent has become irrevocable),  
          after having had no involvement with their child, and  
          without being named on a child's birth certificate, only to  
          stop the adoption by marrying the birth mother.  "This  







                                                                SB 302
                                                                Page  
          5

          scenario," the author's office states, "is rare, but  
          disruptive" of the adoption process.  

          This bill prevents a father from gaining "presumed father"  
          status by marrying the mother in a last-minute attempt to  
          stop the adoption.  It will not prevent a father from  
          asserting his rights as an "alleged father" whose rights  
          may more easily be terminated in order for the adoption to  
          proceed.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Benoit, Berg,  
            Bermudez, Blakeslee, Bogh, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan,  
            Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Coto, Daucher, De La Torre,  
            DeVore, Dymally, Emmerson, Evans, Frommer, Garcia,  
            Goldberg, Hancock, Harman, Haynes, Jerome Horton, Shirley  
            Horton, Houston, Huff, Jones, Karnette, Keene, Klehs,  
            Koretz, La Malfa, La Suer, Laird, Leno, Leslie, Levine,  
            Lieber, Liu, Matthews, Maze, McCarthy, Montanez,  
            Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi, Nation, Nava, Niello,  
            Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Plescia, Richman, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Sharon Runner, Ruskin, Saldana, Salinas, Spitzer,  
            Strickland, Torrico, Tran, Umberg, Vargas, Villines,  
            Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Negrete McLeod, Nunez, Vacancy


          RJG:mel  8/26/05   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****