BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 500|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 500
          Author:   Kuehl (D), et al
          Amended:  9/2/05
          Vote:     27

           
           SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 4/12/05
          AYES:  Simitian, Maldonado, Aanestad, Alarcon, Alquist,  
            Chesbro
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Florez

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/26/05
          AYES:  Dunn, Morrow, Ackerman, Cedillo, Escutia, Figueroa,  
            Kuehl

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  13-0, 5/26/05
          AYES:  Migden, Aanestad, Alarcon, Alquist, Ashburn, Battin,  
            Dutton, Escutia, Florez, Murray, Ortiz, Poochigian,  
            Romero

           SENATE FLOOR  :  40-0, 6/1/05
          AYES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Alarcon, Alquist, Ashburn,  
            Battin, Bowen, Campbell, Cedillo, Chesbro, Cox, Denham,  
            Ducheny, Dunn, Dutton, Escutia, Figueroa, Florez,  
            Hollingsworth, Kehoe, Kuehl, Lowenthal, Machado,  
            Maldonado, Margett, McClintock, Migden, Morrow, Murray,  
            Ortiz, Perata, Poochigian, Romero, Runner, Scott,  
            Simitian, Soto, Speier, Torlakson, Vincent

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 09/07/05 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Pregnant and parenting foster youth
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 500
                                                                Page  
          2


           SOURCE  :     Childrens Law Center of Los Angeles
                      County Welfare Directors Association of  
          California


           DIGEST  :    This bill creates an option for teen foster  
          parents to live with their children in foster homes.

           Assembly Amendments  :  (1) Create a requirement that the  
          Shared Responsibility Plan agreed to between the caregiver,  
          the foster family agency and the dependent minor parent  
          address services to be provided to the minor parent.  (2)  
          Create requirements for considering visitation among the  
          minor parent, the child, the non-custodial parent, and any  
          appropriate family members.  (3) No longer make the new  
          "whole family placement" a separate licensing category with  
          a separate rate.  Instead, the placement will be a subset  
          of the existing placement structure with no separate  
          licensing needed.  These families will receive a more  
          modest increase in funding when they complete the required  
          shared responsibility plan.  This will help reduce the  
          bill's costs and complexity.  (4) Clarify that  "whole  
          family foster home" includes approved relative caregivers  
          and non-relative extended family members.  (5) Add  
          probation youth to the bill, both in the section enabling  
          broader use of Title IV-E funds and the section creating  
          whole family placements.  (6) Make the section of the bill  
          enabling California to draw down additional Title IV-E  
          funds contingent upon acceptance by the federal government.  
           (7) Add co-authors. 
           
           ANALYSIS  :    Existing federal law authorizes federal  
          financial participation to pay for the cost of foster care.  


          Existing state law: 

          1. Establishes Aid to Families with Dependent  
             Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) under which counties  
             provide payments to foster care providers on behalf of  
             qualified children in foster care. 

          2. Prohibits full AFDC-FC payments from being made to a  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 500
                                                                Page  
          3

             foster care facility that houses both a teen parent and  
             his/her child. 

          3. Specifies and defines a list of facilities that may care  
             for foster youth including foster family homes and small  
             family homes among others.

          This bill: 

          1. Allows a child whose parent is adjudged to be a  
             dependent of the court to also be considered a ward of  
             the court for purposes of federal financial  
             participation. 

          2. Specifies that both the foster youth who is the teen  
             parent and the foster youth who is the child may be  
             placed in the same licensed or approved foster care  
             facility if the teen foster parent is receiving  
             reunification services with respect to that child. 

          3. Defines "whole family foster home" as a home that  
             provides care for a teen parent and his/her child and  
             that has been specifically recruited and trained to  
             provide a safe stable environment for both the parent  
             and the child. 

          4. Specifies that whole family foster homes are to be  
             licensed by the Community Care Licensing Division of the  
             Department of Social Services and requests a new rate  
             for "whole family foster home," as defined in this bill.  


          5. Specifies conditions for a foster youth who is a teen  
             parent and his/her child living in a whole family foster  
             home to be eligible for federal financial participation.  


          6. Requires a teen parent in foster care who has full or  
             partial custody of their child to work with the social  
             worker, court and others to design a written shared  
             responsibility plan designed to preserve and strengthen  
             the teen parent family unit and to assist the teen  
             parent in ultimately providing an independent safe and  
             stable home for their child. 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 500
                                                                Page  
          4


          7. Specifies that the shared responsibility plan shall in  
             no way limit the teen parent's legal right to make  
             decisions regarding her child. 

          8. Requires that once the responsibility plan has been  
             completed and provided to the appropriate agencies, the  
             new rate shall be increased by an additional $200 per  
             month to reflect the increased mentoring to be provided  
             to the teen parent while he/she is placed in the whole  
             family foster home. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee  
          analysis, there is a first-year net cost in the range of  
          $400,000 General Fund (GF) and ongoing annual net costs of  
          $200,000 GF. 

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/7/05)

          Children's Law Center of Los Angeles (co-source)
          County Welfare Directors Association of California  
          (co-source)
          Alliance for Children's Rights
          California Alliance of Child and Family Services
          California Commission on the Status of Women
          California National Organization of Women
          California State Association of Counties
          Family Law Section of the State Bar
          Junior Leagues of California
          Los Angeles Affiliate of the National Association of  
          Council for Children
          National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter
          National Center for Youth Law

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office argues that  
          this bill removes the barrier in current law which prevents  
          the maximizing of federal funds to finance the care of  
          foster pregnant and parenting teens.  Recent federal  
          guidelines increase access to federal funds for these  
          cases.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 500
                                                                Page  
          5

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES: Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Benoit, Berg,  
            Bermudez, Blakeslee, Bogh, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan,  
            Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Daucher, De La Torre, DeVore,  
            Dymally, Emmerson, Evans, Frommer, Garcia, Goldberg,  
            Hancock, Harman, Jerome Horton, Shirley Horton, Houston,  
            Huff, Jones, Karnette, Keene, Klehs, Koretz, La Malfa, La  
            Suer, Laird, Leno, Leslie, Levine, Lieber, Liu, Matthews,  
            Maze, McCarthy, Montanez, Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi,  
            Nation, Nava, Negrete McLeod, Niello, Oropeza, Parra,  
            Pavley, Plescia, Richman, Ridley-Thomas, Sharon Runner,  
            Ruskin, Saldana, Salinas, Spitzer, Strickland, Torrico,  
            Tran, Umberg, Vargas, Villines, Walters, Wolk, Wyland,  
            Yee, Nunez
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Coto, Haynes, Vacancy


          CTW:mel  9/8/05   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****























                                                           CONTINUED