BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 726|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 726  
          Author:   Florez (D)
          Amended:  5/17/05
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 4/26/05
           AYES  :  Maldonado, Aanestad, Alarcon, Alquist, Flores
           NO VOTE RECORDED  :  Simitian, Chesbro

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  6-1, 5/10/05
          AYES:  Dunn, Morrow, Cedillo, Escutia, Figueroa, Kuehl
          NOES:  Ackerman

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  11-0, 5/23/05
          AYES:  Migden, Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Battin, Bowen,  
            Dutton, Escutia, Florez, Ortiz, Poochigian
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Murray, Speier


           SUBJECT  :    Dependent children

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill enacts Adams Law, which makes several  
          changes to the statutes governing the removal of a child  
          from a home and placement with the noncustodial parent.

           ANALYSIS  :    Under current law, a child that is at risk of  
          abuse or neglect may become a dependent of the juvenile  
          court.  The court is required to place the child with a  
          parent who desires the child if it determines that this  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 726
                                                                Page  
          2

          parent was not with the child at the time of abuse or  
          neglect and that placing the child with this parent would  
          not be detrimental to the child.  In this case, the court  
          may do one of two things:  (1) order that the parent become  
          legal and physical custodian of the child, or (2) order  
          that the parent assume custody subject to the supervision  
          of the juvenile court, in which case the court may also  
          order reunification services for the family.

          This bill adds a third option:  that the social worker  
          conduct a home visit within three months of placing the  
          child with the noncustodial parent and submit a related  
          report to the court.

          The bill also requires the social worker to inform the  
          noncustodial parent of their right to provide the court  
          with input regarding the child's placement, and requests  
          that the caregiver provide such information on a specified  
          form.

          It is estimated that approximately ten percent of cases per  
          year could be impacted by the provisions of this bill.   
          Increased mandated, potentially reimbursable, costs to  
          local child welfare agencies to comply with the home visit  
          and notification requirements of the bill are unknown, but  
          probably less than $150,000 annually if it took each social  
          worker two hours to comply.  On the other  hand, to the  
          extent the court order option three, rather than option  
          two, and assuming those families would have otherwise  
          received full reunification services, there could be  
          offsetting cost savings.

          Any increased costs to the courts will probably be minor  
          and absorbable.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions             2005-06             2006-07          
              2007-08             Fund

           DSS                                           Minor,  







                                                                SB 726
                                                                Page  
          3

          absorbable costs                    General/
                                                                       
                                                           Federal

          Local child welfare         Unknown mandated, potentially    
                         Local/
                                                  reimbursable costs,  
          probably                       General
                                                  under $150 annually

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/25/05)

          Junior Leagues of California


          CTW:cm  5/25/05   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****