BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1062
                                                                  Page  1

          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1062 (Bowen)
          As Amended August 24, 2006
          Majority vote

           SENATE VOTE  :38-0  
           
           HEALTH              11-0        APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chan, Aghazarian, Berg,   |Ayes:|Chu, Sharon Runner, Bass, |
          |     |Dymally Frommer, De La    |     |Berg, Calderon, Emmerson, |
          |     |Torre, Jones, Montanez    |     |Mullin, Haynes, Karnette, |
          |     |Negrete McLeod, Richman,  |     |Klehs, Leno, Nakanishi,   |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas             |     |Nation, Saldana, Walters, |
          |     |                          |     |Yee                       |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          JUDICIARY           9-0         PUBLIC SAFETY       6-0         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Jones, Evans, Haynes,     |Ayes:|Leno, La Suer, Dymally,   |
          |     |Laird, Leslie, Levine,    |     |Goldberg, Spitzer, Lieber |
          |     |Lieber, Montanez, Huff    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          APPROPRIATIONS      18-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chu, Sharon Runner, Bass, |     |                          |
          |     |Berg, Calderon, De La     |     |                          |
          |     |Torre, Emmerson, Haynes,  |     |                          |
          |     |Karnette, Klehs, Leno,    |     |                          |
          |     |Nakanishi, Nation, Laird, |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Saldana,   |     |                          |
          |     |Walters, Yee              |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Adds sexual assault to California's Confidential  
          Address Program for Victims of Domestic Violence and Stalking  
          (CalCAP) and makes technical changes to the statute that governs  
          the domestic violence programs within the Maternal Child Health  
          (MCH) Branch of the Department of Health Services (DHS) and the  
          Comprehensive Statewide Domestic Violence Program (CSDVP) within  








                                                                  SB 1062
                                                                  Page  2

          the Office of Emergency Services (OES).  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :   

          1)Extends CalCAP eligibility to include victims of sexual  
            assault, in addition to victims of domestic violence and  
            stalking. 

          2)Defines "sexual assault" as an act or attempt made punishable  
            by specified sections of the Penal Code.

          3)Requires MCH and CSDVP, to the extent feasible, in the event  
            an agency receives funding from both MCH and CSDVP during any  
            grant cycle, to coordinate agency site visits and share  
            performance assessment data with the goal of improving  
            efficiency, eliminating duplication, and reducing  
            administrative costs.  

          4)Duplicates the language requiring coordination in #3) above in  
            the Penal Code.

          5)Adds language to resolve a chaptering conflict with AB 2051.

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Creates, until January 1, 2008, CalCAP to protect victims of  
            domestic violence and stalking from being compelled to  
            disclose confidential address information which could put them  
            at risk of future violence.  Participants in CalCAP designate  
            the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) as the agent for  
            service of process and mail receipt so that a victim may flee  
            from an abuser and not be required to divulge his or her new  
            address on, for example, legal documents or voter registration  
            records.  

          2)Establishes CSDVP to provide financial and technical  
            assistance to domestic violence shelter service providers. 

          3)Requires MCH to administer a comprehensive shelter-based grant  
            program to battered women's shelters.

          4)Requires DHS and the Office of Criminal Justice Planning  
            (OCJP) to coordinate agency site visits and share performance  
            assessment data with the goal of improving efficiency,  
            eliminating duplication, and reducing administrative costs to  
            the extent feasible in the event an agency receives funding  








                                                                  SB 1062
                                                                  Page  3

            from both departments.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          analysis, assuming a doubling of the number of "Safe at Home"  
          enrollees (from the current 2,600) and a 50% increase in current  
          program costs, annual GF costs would increase by about $180,000.  
           
           COMMENTS  :  This bill seeks to extend California's CalCAP program  
          to victims of sexual assault.  It also makes technical changes  
          to the statute that governs the domestic violence programs so as  
          to allow different domestic violence programs to consolidate  
          required visitations and share information.   

          Pursuant to SB 489 (Alpert), Chapter 1005, Statutes of 1998, the  
          confidential address program was created to protect victims of  
          domestic violence from the disclosure of address information.   
          Victims of stalking were added in 2000 pursuant to AB 1318  
          (Alpert), Chapter 562, Statutes of 2000.  According to the  
          author, sexual abuse victims often have the same needs for  
          confidentiality as do victims of domestic violence and stalking.  
           Therefore, the author contends, they should be permitted to  
          CalCAP program. 

          According to the author, more than 80% of victim shelters  
          receive funding from both OES and DHS.  Most shelters operate on  
          low budgets and rely heavily on volunteer assistance to keep  
          their doors open.  Because both OES and DHS are required to  
          conduct site visits to assess basic operating procedures, the  
          author states that there is great reason for the two agencies to  
          consolidate visits and share assessment data, saving the state  
          and shelters time, energy, and valuable resources.

          Supporters argue that by requiring OES and DHS to work together,  
          this bill will significantly reduce unnecessary duplication that  
          waste the time and resource of domestic violence programs and  
          shelters.  There is not registered opposition to this bill. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Thomas Clark / JUD. / (916) 319-2334     
                             FN: 0017013