BILL ANALYSIS
SB 1088
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 13, 2005
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Judy Chu, Chair
SB 1088 (Bowen) - As Amended: June 28, 2005
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:8-1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill prohibits ex parte communications in family law
proceedings between the court, attorneys for the parties, the
child's attorney, and mediators and evaluators, with specified
exceptions, and requires the Judicial Council to adopt a rule of
court by July 1, 2006 to implement these requirements.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable costs to the Judicial Council.
COMMENTS
Purpose . In child custody cases, the author argues that
communication should be appropriately limited. The author
indicates that, in such cases, there is often communication
between the judge and the mediator or evaluator, or between a
mediator or evaluator and one party while the other party is
unaware of the communication or of the information provided.
The author maintains that, as a result, important decisions
about the case, including child custody determinations, are made
without any opportunity for the other party to present their
side. In other types of court proceedings, ex-parte
communication is prohibited, and the author believes that family
court shouldn't be an exception.
Los Angeles, Sacramento and several other counties have adopted
local rules that prohibit ex parte communications similar to
this legislation. According to the Judicial Council, such rules
have proved workable and have prevented inappropriate ex parte
communications.
SB 1088
Page 2
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081