BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1088|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1088
          Author:   Bowen (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/22/05
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  4-2, 5/03/05
          AYES:  Dunn, Cedillo, Figueroa, Kuehl
          NOES:  Morrow, Ackerman
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Escutia

           SENATE FLOOR  :  29-8, 5/23/05
          AYES:  Alarcon, Alquist, Bowen, Cedillo, Chesbro, Ducheny,  
            Dunn, Dutton, Escutia, Figueroa, Florez, Kehoe, Kuehl,  
            Machado, Maldonado, Margett, McClintock, Migden, Murray,  
            Ortiz, Perata, Romero, Runner, Scott, Simitian, Soto,  
            Speier, Torlakson, Vincent
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Battin, Campbell, Cox,  
            Denham, Hollingsworth
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Lowenthal, Morrow, Poochigian

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  65-10, 8/25/05 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Family law:  ex parte communications

           SOURCE :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Judicial Council to adopt  
          a rule limiting ex parte communication in family court.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) generally recast the bill with the  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1088
                                                                Page  
          2

          same intent as it left the Senate and now requires the  
          Judicial Council to adopt a rule limiting ex parte  
          communications in family court and (2) add co-authors.

          ANALYSIS:    

          Existing law:

          1.Provides that ex parte conferences may be conducted  
            between the court and parties in a family law proceeding  
            at the discretion of the court. 

          2.Provides that ex parte communications are permitted  
            between mediators or evaluators and parties in situations  
            involving domestic violence. 

          3.Provides that counsel appointed to represent the child's  
            best interests may interview mediators. 

          4.Provides that a child custody evaluator may observe  
            parent-child interactions and interview the parents  
            together or separately. 

          5.Requires psychotherapists to warn and protect from a  
            patient's threatened violent behavior where the patient  
            has communicated a serious threat of physical violence as  
            specified. 

          6.Requires specified individuals, known as mandated  
            reporters, to report to law enforcement suspected child  
            abuse of neglect. 

          This bill:

          1.Prohibits, in the absence of a stipulation by the  
            parties, ex parte communications in family law  
            proceedings between attorneys for any party and any  
            court-appointed or court-connected evaluator or mediator,  
            or between any court-appointed or court-connected  
            evaluator or mediator and the court, except with regard  
            to scheduling appointments. 

          2.Prohibits ex parte communications between a child's  
            counsel, appointed by the court, and any court-appointed  







                                                               SB 1088
                                                                Page  
          3

            or court-connected evaluator or mediator, except where  
            expressly authorized by the court or as authorized to  
            allow the child's counsel to interview mediators. 

          3.Allows for ex parte communications to address cases  
            involving allegations of domestic violence and as needed  
            to inform the court that a restraining order is necessary  
            to prevent imminent risk of physical safety to the child  
            or party. Does not limit the duty of a mediator or  
            evaluator to report child abuse or neglect as a mandated  
            reporter or their duty to warn of serious threat of harm,  
            as specified.  

          4.Directs Judicial Council to adopt a rule to implement the  
            above requirements by July 1, 2006.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee  
          analysis, minor absorbable costs to Judicial Council. 

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/26/05)

          California Commission on the Status of Women
          California National Organization of Women
          National Center for Youth Law
          Prevent Child Abuse, California
          Family Court Bar Association (FLEXCOM)


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office argues that ex  
          parte communication should be appropriately limited  
          because, "Often in a child custody case, there is  
          communication between the judge and the mediator or  
          evaluator, or between a mediator or evaluator and one party  
          but the other party isn't made aware of the communication  
          or of the information provided. As a result, important  
          decisions about the case, including child custody  
          determinations, are made behind closed doors without any  
          opportunity for the other party to present their side of  
          the story.   In other types of court proceedings, ex-parte  
          communication is prohibited. Family court shouldn't be an  
          exception."







                                                               SB 1088
                                                                Page  
          4



           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Berg, Bermudez,  
            Blakeslee, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan, Chavez, Chu,  
            Cohn, Coto, Daucher, De La Torre, DeVore, Dymally, Evans,  
            Frommer, Garcia, Goldberg, Hancock, Jerome Horton,  
            Shirley Horton, Houston, Huff, Jones, Karnette, Keene,  
            Klehs, Koretz, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Liu,  
            Matthews, McCarthy, Montanez, Mountjoy, Mullin,  
            Nakanishi, Nation, Nava, Niello, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley,  
            Plescia, Richman, Ridley-Thomas, Sharon Runner, Ruskin,  
            Saldana, Salinas, Spitzer, Strickland, Torrico, Tran,  
            Umberg, Vargas, Villines, Wolk, Yee
          NOES:  Benoit, Bogh, Cogdill, Haynes, La Malfa, La Suer,  
            Leslie, Maze, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Emmerson, Harman, Negrete McLeod, Nunez,  
            Vacancy


          RJG:nl  8/26/05   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****