BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Kevin Murray, Chairman
1289 (Cedillo)
Hearing Date: 5/25/2006 Amended: 5/3/2006
Consultant: John Miller Policy Vote: Human Svcs 4 - 1
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 1289 allows foster children receiving AFDC-FC
to continue to receive aid after age 18 until age 21 if they are
attending high school, university or community college or
vocational or technical training.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Fund
Benefits $6,000 $12,000 $12,000 GF and
FF
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: Suspense.
SB 1289 is intended to provide additional education and support
to foster youth who "age-out" of eligibility by extending
benefits to youth over the age of 18 until they reach age 21.
The measure also requires county independent living programs to
provide monthly consultations for foster children age 14 and up
and to provide case management services to this same population.
Recent longitudinal studies demonstrate that many graduating
foster youth would benefit from extended support. More than one
half of foster graduates experience homelessness and the average
earnings of young foster graduates are less than poverty level.
Recent studies demonstrate that substantial improvement in the
youth's circumstance can be achieved through extended support.
Additional support should generate offsetting savings. Five
other states provide services beyond age 18.
No estimate on associated costs was available from the
department at the time of this analysis. However, 4,000 foster
youth turn 18 each year, and assuming that 1/3 would use the
benefit at a monthly cost of $750 or $9000 per year, the full
year costs for the educational based extension of benefits would
be approximately $12 million. There are 32,000 foster children
between the ages of 14 and 18 who would be eligible for the
consultation specified in the bill, but the Committee could not
estimate the average cost of this service.