BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1402|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1402
          Author:   Kuehl (D)
          Amended:  4/18/06
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 4/4/06
          AYES:  Migden, Poochigian, Cedillo, Margett, Perata, Romero


           SUBJECT  :    Spousal rape

           SOURCE  :     California Coalition Against Sexual Assault


           DIGEST  :    This bill eliminates the reporting requirement  
          in the spousal rape statute.

           ANALYSIS  :    Current law  provides that rape is an act of  
          sexual intercourse accomplished with a person not the  
          spouse of the perpetrator, as  
          specified.

          Current law  provides that rape of a person who is the  
          spouse of the perpetrator is an act of sexual intercourse  
          accomplished under specified circumstances.

          Current law  requires, with respect only to spousal rape  
          (and not non-spousal rape), that no prosecution shall be  
          commenced "unless the violation was reported to medical  
          personnel, a member of the clergy, an attorney, a shelter  
          representative, a counselor, a judicial officer, a rape  
          crisis agency, a prosecuting agency, a law enforcement  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1402
                                                                Page  
          2

          officer, or a firefighter within one year after the date of  
          the violation.  This reporting requirement shall not apply  
          if the victim's allegation of the offense is corroborated  
          by independent evidence that would otherwise be admissible  
          during trial."

          This bill  deletes this requirement.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  4/18/06)

          California Coalition Against Sexual Assault (source)
          American Association of University Women
          Calegislation
          California Commission on the Status of Women
          California District Attorney's Office
          California National Organization for Women
          California Partnership to End Domestic Violence
          Community Solutions
          DOVES Domestic Violence Education and Services
          Family Services of Tulare County
          Junior Leagues of California
          Marin Abused Women's Services
          Marajee Mason Center
          North County Women's Resource Center and Shelter
          Office of the Attorney General
          South Bay Community Services
          South Lake Tahoe Women's Center
          STAND! Against Domestic Violence
          The Riley Center of St. Vincent de Paul Society
          WEAVE Inc.
          YWCA of Glendale

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  4/18/06)

          California Attorneys for Criminal Justice
          California Public Defenders Association

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author states that "California  
          is one of the few remaining states to impose a reporting  
          requirement for spousal rape.  Courts in other states have  
          found any distinction between marital and nonmarital rape  







                                                               SB 1402
                                                                Page  
          3

          to be unconstitutional.  Most importantly, in the case of  
           People v. Garcia  , a California appellate court  
          "respectfully suggest[ed] the  
          time has come to eliminate" the reporting requirement.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The California Attorneys for  
          Criminal Justice states:

            "While we understand your concern for victims'  
            protection and support in the judicial system, these  
            must be delicately balanced with the due process rights  
            of those who are accused.  The current requirements of  
            witnesses or evidence provided by Penal Code section  
            262 still allow charges to be filed well past one year.  
             The requirements carefully preserve witnesses and/or  
            evidence and ensure that only meritorious allegations  
            are prosecuted.  They also consistently encourage any  
            victims to come forward and seek protection, counseling  
            and/or criminal justice.  Removal of these requirements  
            will permit prosecution in cases with little or no  
            supporting evidence, years after the alleged acts, and  
            are very difficult accusations to defend.  The existing  
            balance in the statute carefully protects due process  
            and the fair trials California is known to provide."


          RJG:mel  4/19/06   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****