BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1641
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 27, 2006

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
                                 Noreen Evans, Chair
                     SB 1641 (Soto) - As Amended:  June 20, 2006

           SENATE VOTE  :  27-9
           
          SUBJECT  :  Foster care providers.

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the Department of Social Services (DSS)  
          Director to report to the Legislature during the 2007-08 budget  
          hearings on the progress of the DSS residential regulation  
          review group.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Acknowledges that DSS has convened a children's residential  
            regulation review workgroup which includes DSS staff and  
            stakeholders to review community care and foster care  
            statutes, regulations and polices to ensure that they promote  
            the safety and well-being of children and youth in foster care  
            and those who are leaving foster care.

          2)Specifies that when a placement agency has placed a child with  
            a relative caregiver, nonrelative extended family member,  
            licensed foster family home or a foster family agency for  
            subsequent placement in a certified family home or group home  
            the placement agency shall ensure that the placement of the  
            child best meets the needs of a child.

          3)Specifies criteria to satisfy the placement meeting the needs  
            of the child by promoting the least restrictive environment,  
            having appropriate access to household and personal cleaning  
            products, having access to over-the-counter medications and  
            learning reasonable self-care, having access to regular  
            activities commonly associated with living in a home with a  
            family.

          4)Declares the intent of the Legislature to ensure that youth  
            placed in out-of-home placements are given the opportunity to  
            live in an environment that resembles as closely as possible  
            non-foster care families.

          5)Makes additional findings and declarations regarding foster  
            care licensing.









                                                                  SB 1641
                                                                  Page  2

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides for the licensure of foster care providers in foster  
            family homes that provide care for no more that six children.

          2)Specifies that a relative caregiver's home is exempt from  
            foster home licensure, but requires relatives and their homes  
            to be assessed by standards equivalent to licensure and  
            approval by a county social worker.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Minor; undetermined administrative costs for  
          DSS.

           COMMENTS  :  Last year the Legislature passed and the Governor  
          signed SB 358 (Scott), Chapter 628, Statutes of 2005.  This  
          measure allowed foster parents to use a "prudent parent"  
          standard when hiring a short-term babysitter without obtaining a  
          fingerprint criminal background check clearance.  This bill  
          stressed the importance of foster parents being able to use good  
          judgment while allowing foster youth and foster families the  
          same kind of lifestyle that birth or adoptive families have.   
          Both SB 1641 and SB 358 are aimed at changing the rigid and  
          often unnecessary rules that foster parents and potential  
          adoptive parents must follow.

          According to the author, examples of impractical regulations  
          that stigmatize foster youth and their caregivers are:  "a  
          seventeen-year-old youth [who] is never allowed to remain home  
          alone - even when his foster mother needs to run to the store to  
          pick up groceries for dinner; cleansing agents such as laundry  
          detergents [that] cannot be left in an accessible location for  
          foster teens who want to do their laundry; no more than two  
          children can share a bedroom even for a single night - for  
          example, when a relative, such as a grandparent comes for a  
          brief visit."

          Supporters of the measure note that, "(i)f we trust caregivers  
          enough to provide homes to children in foster care, then we  
          should trust them to behave as prudent parents in making  
          decisions about conditions, activities, and supervision in their  
          homes."

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 








                                                                 SB 1641
                                                                  Page  3

           
          National Center for Youth Law (NCYL) (co-sponsor)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees  
          (AFSCME)
          California Alliance of Child and Family Services
          Chief Probations Officers of California (CPOC)
          Children's Advocacy Institute (CAI)
          Children's Law Center of Los Angeles (CLC)
          County of San Diego
          County Welfare Directors Association of California (CWDA)
          Junior Leagues of California State Public Affairs Committee  
          (SPAC)
          Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting 
          Los Angeles Affiliate of the National Association of Counsel for  
          Children (LA-NACC)
          Straight From The Heart
          The Foster Parent Association of Santa Cruz County
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Caitlin O'Halloran / HUM. S. / (916)  
          319-2089