BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1641|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1641
          Author:   Soto (D)
          Amended:  8/22/06
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE  :  3-1, 3/28/06
          AYES:  Maldonado, Chesbro, Romero
          NOES:  Aanestad
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Alquist

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  8-3, 4/24/06
          AYES:  Murray, Alarcon, Alquist, Dutton, Escutia, Florez,  
            Romero, Torlakson
          NOES:  Ashburn, Battin, Poochigian
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Aanestad, Ortiz

           SENATE FLOOR  :  27-9, 5/11/06
          AYES:  Alarcon, Alquist, Bowen, Cedillo, Chesbro, Denham,  
            Ducheny, Dunn, Escutia, Figueroa, Florez, Kehoe,  
            Lowenthal, Machado, Maldonado, Margett, McClintock,  
            Murray, Ortiz, Perata, Romero, Scott, Simitian, Soto,  
            Speier, Torlakson, Vincent
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Battin, Cox, Dutton,  
            Hollingsworth, Morrow, Poochigian
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Kuehl, Migden, Runner, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  71-8, 8/28/06 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Foster care providers

           SOURCE  :     Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1641
                                                                Page  
          2

                      National Center for Youth Law


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Department of Social  
          Services Director to report to the Legislature during the  
          2007-08 budget hearings on the progress of the Department  
          of Social Services residential regulation review group.

           Assembly Amendments  recast provisions relative to requiring  
          the Director of Social Services to convene a workshop to  
          review foster care provisions in existing law.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law vests the legal responsibility  
          for establishing policies, licensing standards and  
          regulations for the care and supervision of all children  
          removed from their parents due to dependency, neglect or  
          abuse.

          Existing law requires placement agencies which utilize  
          "foster family agencies" to require those agencies when  
          placing a child in a foster home to place each child in a  
          home that best meets the needs of the child.

          This bill:

           1.Acknowledges that the Department of Social Services  
            (DSS) has convened a children's residential regulation  
            review workgroup which includes DSS staff and  
            stakeholders to review community care and foster care  
            statutes, regulations and polices to ensure that they  
            promote the safety and well-being of children and youth  
            in foster care and those who are leaving foster care. 

           2.Specifies that when a placement agency has placed a  
            child with a relative caregiver, nonrelative extended  
            family member, licensed foster family home or a foster  
            family agency for subsequent placement in a certified  
            family home or group home the placement agency shall  
            ensure that, to the fullest extent possible, the  
            placement of the child best meets the needs of a child.

           3.Specifies criteria to satisfy the placement meeting the  
            needs of the child by promoting the least restrictive  
            environment, having appropriate access to household and  







                                                               SB 1641
                                                                Page  
          3

            personal cleaning products, having access to  
            over-the-counter medications and learning reasonable  
            self-care, having access to regular activities commonly  
            associated with living in a home with a family.

           4.Declares the intent of the Legislature to ensure that  
            youth placed in out-of-home placements are given the  
            opportunity to live in an environment that resembles as  
            closely as possible non-foster care families.

           5.Makes additional findings and declarations regarding  
            foster care licensing.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis  
          there are minor, absorbable administrative costs for the  
          DSS to review and clean up relevant regulations governing  
          the licensing of foster care facilities.  In addition,  
          there are minor, if any, nonreimbursable local public  
          safety costs as this bill expands an existing crime  
          relating to licensing and regulation of placement agencies  
          and foster care providers. 


           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  4/25/06)

          Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting (co-source)
          National Center for Youth Law (co-source)
          AFSCME
          County Welfare Directors Association of California
          Foster Parent Association of Santa Cruz County
          National Association of Council for Children, Los Angeles  
          Chapter
          Straight from the Heart

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          the goal of the legislation as "all foster children should  
          live in the most family-like setting possible."  The  
          author's office further cites examples of current licensing  
          standards and regulations which cause undue hardship on  
          foster children by depriving them of participation in  
          age-appropriate normal behavior.







                                                               SB 1641
                                                                Page  
          4


           1.A 17 year old is not allowed to be home alone, even  
            while a foster parent runs a simple errand.

           2.Laundry detergent cannot be accessible to foster teens.

           3.No more than two children can occupy a bedroom even for  
            a single night, precluding sibling or grandparent  
            visitation, let alone school friends "sleeping over."

          These and other such examples have also been cited as  
          barriers to recruiting foster parents.  Many families do  
          not want to alter their own homes so radically that they  
          would not consider them to be "normal" as a result of  
          accepting a foster child.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Benoit, Berg,  
            Bermudez, Blakeslee, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan, Chavez,  
            Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Coto, Daucher, De La Torre, Dymally,  
            Emmerson, Evans, Frommer, Garcia, Goldberg, Hancock,  
            Jerome Horton, Shirley Horton, Houston, Huff, Jones,  
            Karnette, Keene, Klehs, Koretz, Laird, Leno, Leslie,  
            Levine, Lieber, Lieu, Liu, Matthews, Maze, McCarthy,  
            Montanez, Mullin, Nation, Nava, Negrete McLeod, Niello,  
            Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Plescia, Richman, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Sharon Runner, Ruskin, Saldana, Salinas, Spitzer,  
            Strickland, Torrico, Tran, Umberg, Vargas, Villines,  
            Wolk, Wyland, Yee, Nunez
          NOES:  Bogh, DeVore, Haynes, La Malfa, La Suer, Mountjoy,  
            Nakanishi, Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Vacancy


          CTW:do  8/29/06   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****