BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1667
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 27, 2006

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
                                 Noreen Evans, Chair
                     SB 1667 (Kuehl) - As Amended:  June 26, 2006

           SENATE VOTE  :  38-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  Dependent children.

           SUMMARY  :  Allows foster parents to attend and provide written  
          evidence in post-permanency planning hearings and requires  
          social workers to serve a copy of the Judicial Council Caregiver  
          Information Form to foster parents or relative caregivers.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Allows any foster parent, Indian custodian, relative  
            caregiver, community care facility or foster family agency  
            with physical custody of a child to attend all juvenile  
            dependency court post permanency planning hearings for that  
            child.  Allows these individuals to submit written information  
            they deem to be relevant to the court.

          2)Requires service of the Judicial Council Caregiver Information  
            Form and instructions for filing on any foster parents, or  
            relative caregivers in addition to the social worker's  
            recommendations.

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Allows the juvenile court to adjudge a minor child to be a  
            "dependent" of the court.  The purpose of dependency  
            proceedings are to protect children from physical, sexual, or  
            emotional abuse and neglect. 

          2)Allows a social worker under the direction of the juvenile  
            court to temporarily place a child who is a dependent of the  
            court.  

          3)Requires all juvenile court proceedings to be held in special  
            or separate session.  Attendance is limited to parents, adult  
            relatives in the state, probation officers, representative of  
            an Indian child's tribe, and other specified individuals.   
            Foster parents are not permitted in those proceedings unless  
            specifically authorized by statute. 








                                                                  SB 1667
                                                                  Page  2


          4)Allows de facto parents, and prospective adoptive parents to  
            be made parties to a dependency proceeding, providing them the  
            right to attend all hearings, counsel and to present evidence.  
             Does not require foster parents to be made parties to  
            dependency proceedings. 

          5)Provides foster parents, relative caregivers and certified  
            foster parents the right to notice,  attendance, and  
            submission of written evidence they deem relevant for certain  
            dependency review hearings.  Social workers are required to  
            serve a copy of their recommendations on foster parents, or  
            relative caregivers, at least 10 days prior to a dependency  
            review hearing.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :  When children have encountered serious physical,  
          sexual, or emotional abuse and neglect they are placed under the  
          jurisdiction of the juvenile court.  Prior to a decision about  
          permanent placement, many of these children are temporarily  
          placed with foster families.  During their time with the foster  
          child, foster parents gain valuable information that may be  
          useful to the juvenile court.  However, many foster parents are  
          unfamiliar with the process used to convey this information for  
          use in the dependency proceedings.  

          This bill seeks to facilitate foster parent involvement by  
          requiring service of the Judicial Council Caregiver Information  
          Form and instructions for filing that form by the social worker.  
           The author states that this bill is needed because, "even  
          though [foster parents] may be in an ideal position to evaluate  
          foster youths' needs and to advocate for their best interests,  
          access to...dependency court proceedings is, at best,  
          inconsistent."  Supporters, including the Legal Advocates for  
          Permanent Parenting, the American Federation of State, County  
          and Municipal Employees and the Family Law Section, State Bar  
          explain that "lack of input from relatives and foster parents  
          caring for dependent children undermines quality decision making  
          in California juvenile courts."  Supporters conclude that, as a  
          result, "children may not receive appropriate services or, in  
          extreme cases, suffer injury or death when information from  
          their caregivers is excluded from the court decision making  
          process."  









                                                                  SB 1667
                                                                  Page  3

          Due to the sensitive nature of the proceedings, juvenile  
          dependency hearings are closed to all but a select group of  
          individuals.  Federal law conditions receipt of certain funding  
          upon providing foster parents access to all dependency review  
          proceedings regarding their foster child. California's  
          implementation of the federal requirement is piecemeal,  
          providing foster parents with notice for some but not all  
          dependency hearings.  The sponsors state, "(f)oster caregivers  
          routinely express their frustration in not having easy access to  
          the juvenile court judges who make decisions about children  
          residing in foster care."  This bill seeks to close one of the  
          gaps in existing law by authorizing foster parents and other  
          individuals to attend post permanency planning hearings.  

          In 2005, the Legislature enacted SB 726 (Flores), Chapter 632,  
          Statutes of 2005 which, among other things, required a county  
          social worker to inform a foster child's caretaker that he or  
          she has a right to provide the court with input regarding the  
          placement of the child via the Judicial Council Caregiver  
          Information Form.  

           Technical amendment
           
          On page 5 line 40, the term Judicial Council Caregiver Form  
          should read Judicial Council Caregiver Information Form.

           SECOND COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE  .  This bill was previously heard  
          in the Assembly Judiciary Committee on June 13, 2006, and was  
          approved on an 8-0 vote.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting (sponsor)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees  
          (AFSCME)
          California Alliance of Child and Family Services
          California Coalition for Youth (CCY)
          California State Care Providers Association
          Family Law Section of the State Bar of California
          Foster Parents Association of Santa Cruz
          Gay and Lesbian Adolescent Social Services, Inc. (G.L.A.S.S.)
          Judicial Council of CA
          Junior League of California State Public Affairs Committee  








                                                                  SB 1667
                                                                  Page  4

          (SPAC)
            Los Angeles Superior Court
          National Center on Youth Law (NCYL)
          Straight From The Heart
          10 Individuals

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Caitlin O'Halloran / HUM. S. / (916)  
          319-2089