BILL ANALYSIS
SB 1758
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 16, 2006
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Judy Chu, Chair
SB 1758 (Figueroa) - As Amended: August 7, 2006
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:7 -
2
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill strengthens the regulation of adoption facilitators.
Specifically, this bill:
1)Increases the surety bond that adoption facilitators are
required to maintain from $10,000 to $25,000.
2)Requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) to create and
maintain a statewide adoption facilitator registry.
3)Authorizes DSS to adapt the existing registry process it uses
for adoption service providers.
4)Requires adoption facilitators to provide DSS with a
disclosure form containing information about their educational
background and identity, including fingerprint cards.
5)Authorizes DSS to submit the fingerprint cards to the
Department of Justice for a criminal background check.
6)Requires DSS to post on its Internet Website information that
shows whether an adoption facilitator is in compliance with
registration and bond requirements.
7)Prohibits adoption facilitators from using a photolisting to
advertise minor children available for adoption.
8)Allows DSS to impose fees that cover the costs of implementing
this legislation.
FISCAL EFFECT
SB 1758
Page 2
Implementing this legislation would likely cost approximately
$250,000 a year. According to information provided by the
author, there are currently 50 adoption facilitators in
California. In order to offset the costs of this legislation,
each facilitator would need to be charged an annual fee of
$5,000.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale. The intent of this legislation is to increase
consumer protections for families that use adoption
facilitators for private adoption. According to the author,
adoption facilitators play a significant role in the adoption
process but receive little oversight and regulation. Existing
requirements of a $10,000 bond and valid business license are
insufficient to provide consumers with adequate protection as
"[m]ost facilitators charge more than double the bond amount."
This bill comes as a response to consumer complaints.
2)Background . Couples seeking to adopt have several options,
among them proceeding through a state licensed adoption agency
or adoption facilitator. Adoption facilitators are not
currently licensed by the state and are subject only to a
$10,000 bonding requirement. These facilitators locate
children available for adoption and act as intermediaries in
the adoption process, all for a substantial fee. Current
regulations concerning adoption facilitators were enacted in
1996 and remain in their original form.
Last year, Napa police raided a local adoption facilitator
that purported to offer Kazak, Russian, Vietnamese, Ukrainian
and Guatemalan children. The raid was prompted by reports that
the facilitator had defrauded several families out of
thousands of dollars. Further investigation revealed numerous
stories of families who were shown videos of foreign children,
only to later find out that those children did not exist or
were not available for adoption in that country. Some of these
individuals spent over $30,000 in fees and travel costs to go
see what they thought would be their adopted child. Many
families were either told the child was not available or
presented with alternate children to adopt. Other families,
SB 1758
Page 3
however, were satisfied, and received children through this
facilitator.
3)Related Legislation .
a) SB 1393 (Florez), would create an expedited procedure
for intercountry adotions. (This bill is set to be heard in
this committee today.)
b) SB 2035 (Killea), Chapter 1135, Statutes of 1996,
enacted current regulations concerning adoption
facilitators including the $10,000 bond.
c) SB 1674 (Scott), 2002, would amend existing law
concerning advertisement and disclosure by facilitators.
(Held in the Senate Judiciary Committee.)
d) AB 550 (Zettel), 2001 would prohibit a court from making
an order of adoption before home-study performed. (Held in
the Senate Judiciary Committee.)
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081