BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1852|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1852
Author: Senate Judiciary Committee
Amended: 6/20/06
Vote: 21
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE : 5-0, 5/9/06
AYES: Dunn, Morrow, Ackerman, Escutia, Kuehl
SENATE FLOOR : 37-0, 5/18/06 (Consent)
AYES: Aanestad, Ackerman, Alarcon, Alquist, Ashburn,
Battin, Bowen, Cedillo, Chesbro, Cox, Denham, Ducheny,
Dutton, Escutia, Figueroa, Florez, Kehoe, Kuehl,
Lowenthal, Machado, Maldonado, Margett, McClintock,
Migden, Morrow, Murray, Ortiz, Perata, Poochigian,
Romero, Runner, Scott, Simitian, Soto, Speier, Torlakson,
Vincent
NO VOTE RECORDED: Dunn, Hollingsworth, Vacancy
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 76-0, 08/07/06 (Consent) - See last page
for vote
SUBJECT : Maintenance of the codes
SOURCE : Office of Legislative Counsel
DIGEST : This bill makes numerous technical changes in
the California codes that have been recommended by the
Legislative Counsel's Office. The proposed changes would
not make any substantive change in the law.
CONTINUED
SB 1852
Page
2
Assembly Amendments made technical changes.
ANALYSIS : Each year, Legislative Counsel's Office
identifies grammatical errors and other errors of a
technical nature that have been inadvertently enacted into
statutory law. The annual "Maintenance of the Codes" bill
is the vehicle for implementing the wholesale corrections.
For inclusion into the bill, the change must be technical
only and may not affect or enact substantive law. Any
proposed change which is identified as having a substantive
change is automatically excised from the bill.
A condition for inclusion in the annual code maintenance
bill is that the change must be nonsubstantive. Therefore,
any provision that is identified as making a substantive
law change will be deleted without question by the
Legislative Counsel's Office.
Proposed Section 735 on page 882 of the bill provides that
any other bill enacted by the Legislature during the 2006
calendar year that amends, adds, repeals, or otherwise
affects any section affected by this bill, shall prevail
over the provisions of this bill. This "all-purpose"
yielding clause avoids any chaptering problems.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 5/11/06)
Office of Legislative Counsel (source)
ASSEMBLY FLOOR :
AYES: Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Benoit, Berg,
Bermudez, Blakeslee, Bogh, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan,
Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Coto, Daucher, De La Torre,
DeVore, Dymally, Emmerson, Evans, Frommer, Garcia,
Goldberg, Hancock, Haynes, Jerome Horton, Shirley Horton,
Huff, Jones, Karnette, Keene, Klehs, Koretz, La Malfa, La
Suer, Laird, Leno, Leslie, Levine, Lieber, Lieu, Liu,
Matthews, McCarthy, Montanez, Mountjoy, Mullin,
Nakanishi, Nation, Nava, Negrete McLeod, Niello, Parra,
Pavley, Plescia, Richman, Ridley-Thomas, Sharon Runner,
SB 1852
Page
3
Ruskin, Saldana, Salinas, Spitzer, Strickland, Torrico,
Tran, Umberg, Vargas, Villines, Walters, Wolk, Wyland,
Yee, Nunez
NO VOTE RECORDED: Houston, Maze, Oropeza
RJG:nl 8/8/06 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****