BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Tom Torlakson, Chairman
1334 (Swanson)
Hearing Date: 7/16/07 Amended: AI 2/23/07
Consultant: Nora Lynn Policy Vote: Public Safety 3-2
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY:
AB 1334 requires the director of the Department of Corrections
and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to allow a nonprofit or public health
care agency to distribute sexual barrier protection devices,
such as condoms and dental dams, to inmates.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Fund
Disposal unit installation $175* $244*
$244*General
and maintenance
_____
* See staff comments
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria to be placed on the
Suspense file.
CDCR does not currently require HIV/AIDS testing of prison
inmates, but the department estimated in 2003-04 some 1,240
inmates in the state's prisons were infected with HIV or AIDS.
Cost of their care was approximately $18 million 2003-04. Sexual
activity among inmates is prohibited under existing law, and
condoms are currently treated as contraband.
AB 1334 would require CDCR to allow nonprofits and public health
agencies to distribute sexual barrier protection devices to
inmates and states that their possession shall not serve as the
basis for administrative sanctions.
AB 1334 does not require CDCR to distribute sexual barrier
protection devices nor does it specify a means of disposal for
them. The department indicates it would implement AB 1334 by
installing locked biohazard containers in each of its 725
housing units for barrier device disposal. Using this
implementation method, the department would incur one-time costs
of approximately $58,000 to install the locked container units,
and department staff would replace the 725 biohazard inserts
twice monthly, resulting in staff and materials costs in the
$244,000 range annually.
If another disposal method were to be implemented by the
department, however, and utilized instead, costs could be
considerably less.
AB 1334 is similar to AB 1677 (Koretz, 2006) which was vetoed.