BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2103
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 16, 2008

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE
                                   Joe Coto, Chair
                AB 2103 (Plescia) - As Introduced:  February 19, 2008
           
          SUBJECT  :   Horse Racing and Workers' Compensation

           SUMMARY  :   Extends the sunset date on a deduction from  
          parimutuel wagering on thoroughbred horse racing in order to pay  
          for workers' compensation expenses.  Specifically, 
           this bill  :

          1)Extends until January 1, 2015, a requirement of thoroughbred  
            associations and fairs to deduct 0.5 percent of the amount of  
            exotic parimutuel wagering on thoroughbred races to defray the  
            costs of workers' compensation insurance.

          2)Extends until January 1, 2015, the requirement of funds not  
            expended on workers' compensation costs to be carried forward  
            to the subsequent year, or used for the cost of health and  
            safety programs, research or safety equipment, or to make  
            capital improvements to prevent workplace accidents and to  
            increase the safety of jockeys, exercise riders, backstretch  
            employees, and other racetrack personnel.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires thoroughbred associations and fairs to deduct 0.5  
            percent of the total amount handled in exotic parimutuel pools  
            of throughbred races in order to defray the costs of workers'  
            compensation insurance.  

          2)Provides that these deductions shall pay for supplemental  
            premiums that reduce rates, pay for benefits of trainers and  
            owners of thoroughbred horses, and to reimburse these trainers  
            and owners for the costs of workers' compensation insurance.

          3)Requires that the deductions be managed by an organization  
            formed by the thoroughbred racing association and the owners  
            of thoroughbred horses.

          4)Requires that funds not expended on workers' compensation  
            costs to be carried forward to the subsequent year, or used  
            for the cost of health and safety programs, research or safety  








                                                                  AB 2103
                                                                  Page  2

            equipment, or to make capital improvements to prevent  
            workplace accidents and to increase the safety of jockeys,  
            exercise riders, backstretch employees, and other racetrack  
            personnel.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Undetermined.

           COMMENTS  :   

           1)Background.   According to the Author, in 2004 the horseracing  
            industry, legislators, and the Governor developed legislation  
            to address runaway workers' compensation insurance rates.  The  
            Author further reports that at that time, industry rates had  
            increased above $44 per $100 of payroll, and many owners and  
            trainers left the state, which depleted the inventory of  
            horses and the number of horses competing in horse races.  The  
            industry responded by establishing its own captive insurance  
            program, referred to as the California Horsemen's Safety  
            Alliance (CHSA).  Soon thereafter the Legislature passed AB  
            701 in 2004 (Statutes of 2004, Chapter 40) that established  
            the 0.5 percent deduction from exotic pari-mutuel wagering  
            pools in order to help provide relief from escalating costs.

          2)The Author also reports that since the 2004 law was enacted:

             a)   Workers' compensation costs have been reduced as much as  
               70 percent;
             b)   The exodus of trainers and owners has stopped and new  
               trainers and owners are bringing horses to California in  
               large numbers;
             c)   The CHSA has established industry safety training  
               programs, treatment oversight programs, return to work  
               programs, and safety equipment research programs which have  
               reduced the number of accidents and cost of resulting  
               claims; and
             d)   Major reductions of premiums and claim costs have  
               occurred.  In a six month period (12/02 -7/03) prior to the  
               law, there were 123 insured participants with total  
               premiums of $2,929,585 and claims paid of $2,617,716.  In  
               contrast, in the 12-month policy period July 2006 to June  
               2007, there were 399 insured participants with premiums of  
               $8,757,818 and claims paid of $2,830,121.

           3)Workers' Compensation Reforms.   It should be noted that at the  
            same time that this horseracing law regarding workers'  








                                                                  AB 2103
                                                                  Page  3

            compensation was enacted, that the Legislature and Governor  
            enacted a major overhaul of the overall workers' compensation  
            system.  Clearly, that major overhaul of the workers'  
            compensation system also reduced premiums and claims costs.   
            What is not clear is how much savings can be attributed to the  
            major overhaul of the workers' compensation system in  
            comparison to the savings from this specific program directed  
            at the horseracing industry. 

           4)Consistency in Base Year?   Existing law provides that when the  
            law sunsets (Jan. 1, 2010) any unexpended funds shall be  
            distributed based upon the total thoroughbred handle of  two  
            years prior  (i.e., 2008).  This bill provides that when the  
            law sunsets (Jan. 1, 2015) any unexpended funds shall be  
            distributed based upon the total thoroughbred handle from  
             seven years prior  (i.e., 2008).  Is it the Author's intent  
            that the base year be set at two years prior to the sunset of  
            the law?  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Thoroughbred Owners of California (Sponsor)

           Opposition 
           
          None received.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Manny Hernandez / INS. / (916) 319-2086