BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Tom Torlakson, Chairman

                                           114 (Florez)
          
          Hearing Date:  3/19/07          Amended: 3/7/07
          Consultant: Mark Mckenzie       Policy Vote: Rev/Tax 6-0
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:   SB 114, an urgency measure, would provide  
          disaster assistance and tax relief for losses related to severe  
          freezing conditions in January, 2007.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2006-07      2007-08       2008-09     Fund
           Prop.Tax Reimbursement   -----------minimal revenue  
          loss----------         SF*        
          Homeowner's exemption       -----------no revenue loss----------  
                                 GF         
          Disaster loss carryover$180       minor gain  minor gainGF  
          __________
          *Special Fund For Economic Uncertainties (NOTE:  this fund is  
          continuously appropriated, so requiring an allocation for this  
          purpose constitutes an appropriation)
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the  
          Suspense File.
          
           Property Tax Reimbursement
           Current law provides for a downward reassessment of properties  
          affected by a disaster.  Taxpayers are entitled to a refund of  
          any "excess" property tax paid on the property.  Taxpayers whose  
          property is damaged are also allowed to defer payment of the  
          next installment of property taxes pending receipt of a  
          corrected tax bill for the reassessed property.  In recent  
          years, the Legislature has acted to provide one-year state  
          reimbursement of property tax losses to local governments  
          resulting from reductions in assessed values of damaged or  
          destroyed properties.

          This bill would provide for state reimbursement to backfill any  
          property tax revenue loss resulting from assessment reductions  










          to counties that the Governor declared to be in a state of  
          emergency as a result of the severe freezing conditions that  
          occurred in January 2007.  This bill would apply to the Counties  
          of El Dorado, Fresno, Imperial, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced,  
          Monterey, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Luis Obispo,  
          Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Stanislaus, Tulare, Ventura, and  
          Yuba.  The state would hold local governments harmless for  
          freeze-related 2006-07 property tax losses, based initially on  
          an estimate of loss, followed by a corrective adjustment based  
          on the actual property tax loss.

           Homeowners' Exemption
           Current law exempts from the property tax the first $7,000 of  
          the assessed value of an owner-occupied principal place of  
          residence.  However, properties that become vacant or are under  
          construction on the January 1 lien date are not eligible for  
          this homeowners' exemption for the upcoming tax year.  Local  
          jurisdictions are reimbursed by the state for property tax  
          losses due to the homeowners' exemption.
                                   ---continued---
          Page 2
          SB 114 (Florez)

          This bill would provide that any dwelling that qualified for the  
          exemption prior to January 11, 2007 that was damaged or  
          destroyed as a result of the severe freezing conditions, as  
          declared by the Governor in January 2007, may not be denied the  
          exemption solely on the basis that the dwelling was temporarily  
          damaged or destroyed or was being reconstructed by the owner.   
          This would apply to 18 counties specified in the  
          Governor-declared disaster.  The Board of Equalization estimates  
          that this provision would likely result in no revenue loss in  
          practical application.  Given that the freeze occurred after  
          this year's lien date (January 1, 2007), a home would have to  
          still be destroyed or damaged and uninhabited due to the freeze  
          by January 1, 2008.  It is likely that any affected homes would  
          have been repaired by then.

           Carry Forward of Casualty Loss Deduction  
          Current law allows nonbusiness taxpayers to deduct uninsured  
          losses, less $100, to the extent the loss exceeds 10% of  
          adjusted gross income.  Business taxpayers may deduct losses  
          against income; a portion of losses may be carried forward to  
          offset future years' tax liabilities for up to 10 years.   
          Taxpayers may either claim the losses as an itemized deduction  
          in the year the loss occurs, or in the preceding year by filing  










          an amended return for the prior year.  For previous disasters,  
          legislation has allowed both business and non business taxpayers  
          to carry forward 100% of their excess losses for 5 years.

          This bill would apply the special disaster loss carryover  
          treatment for losses sustained as a result of severe freezing  
          conditions in January 2007 in the Counties of El Dorado, Fresno,  
          Imperial, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Riverside, San  
          Bernardino, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa  
          Clara, Stanislaus, Tulare, Ventura, and Yuba.  The Franchise Tax  
          Board estimates a total revenue loss of approximately $180,000  
          in 2006-07, if 20% of the tax-deductible losses were applied to  
          the preceding year.  To the extent that these deductions would  
          have been claimed in later years had they not been taken in  
          2006, there is a minor revenue gain in those later years.