BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 232
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 232 (Ducheny)
          As Amended August 31, 2007
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :24-11  
           
           EDUCATION           10-0        APPROPRIATIONS      13-2        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Mullin, Garrick,          |Ayes:|Leno, Caballero, Davis,   |
          |     |Brownley, Coto, Eng,      |     |DeSaulnier,               |
          |     |Hancock, Huff, Karnette,  |     |Emmerson, Huffman,        |
          |     |Nakanishi, Solorio        |     |Karnette, Krekorian,      |
          |     |                          |     |Lieu, Ma, Nava, Solorio,  |
          |     |                          |     |De Leon                   |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Walters, Nakanishi        |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Extends the sunset on the California Subject Matter  
          Projects (CSMP) and requires the Regents of the University of  
          California (UC) to prepare a final report.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :

          1)Extends the sunset of the CSMP from June 30, 2007 to June 30,  
            2012, and as of January 1, 2013, is repealed, unless a later  
            enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2013,  
            deletes or extends the dates on which it becomes inoperative  
            and is repealed.

          2)Deletes obsolete provisions requiring an independent  
            evaluation.

          3)Requires the UC to provide a final report to the Governor and  
            appropriate policy and fiscal committee of the Legislature on  
            or before January 1, 2011, and requires the report to include,  
            but not be limited to, all of the following information,  
            compiled for a four-year period:

             a)   The number, and level of experience, of participants in  
               each subject matter project;









                                                                  SB 232
                                                                  Page  2


             b)   The total amount of funds expended, on an annual basis,  
               for each subject matter project; 

             c)   An explanation of the type of professional development  
               activities offered pursuant to each subject matter project;  
               and, 

             d)   A list including the name and location of each school  
               affiliated with a subject matter project.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides for the establishment and maintenance of Subject  
            Matter Projects for the purpose of developing and enhancing  
            teachers' subject matter knowledge in the following six  
            specified areas: writing, reading and literature, mathematics,  
            science, history-social science, and world history and  
            international studies.

          2)Requires the UC Regents with the approval of an intersegmental  
            Concurrence Committee to establish and maintain the projects  
            with funds appropriated in the Budget Act. 

          3)Authorizes the UC to establish other subject matter projects  
            and prohibits funds allocated in the Budget Act from being  
            used for subject matter projects not specified in law.

          4)Specifies that the CSMPs become inoperative on June 30, 2007  
            and are repealed on January 1, 2008.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, General Fund cost pressure of $9 million.

           COMMENTS  :  Established by SB 1882 (Morgan/Hart) in 1988 and then  
          reauthorized by AB 1734 (Mazzoni), Chapter 333, Statutes of  
          1998, the California Subject Matter Projects are administered by  
          the UC Regents to provide professional development consistent  
          with the state's Academic Content Standards.  The CSMP serves  
          over 800 School districts in close to 100 sites statewide on  
          campuses of the UC, California State University, and independent  
          colleges and universities.  According to the UC, the projects  
          annually provide training to over 40,000 teachers,  
          administrators, and university faculty.









                                                                  SB 232
                                                                  Page  3


          Current law authorizes six subject matter projects and this bill  
          simply extends the authorization for those six projects.  The UC  
          maintains three additional subject matter projects that are not  
          currently authorized in statute:  physical education/health,  
          foreign languages and the arts.  AB 1734 made significant  
          governance and programmatic changes and eliminated these three  
          projects.  AB 1734 also authorized the UC to establish other  
          CSMPs, with the condition that the new projects would not  
          receive funding in the annual Budget Act.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Misty Feusahrens / ED. / (916) 319-2087  




                                                                FN: 0002734