BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 235|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 235
          Author:   Negrete McLeod (D)
          Amended:  7/19/07 
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC EMP. & RET. COMMITTEE  :  4-1, 4/16/07
          AYES:  Wiggins, Ashburn, Migden, Negrete McLeod
          NOES:  McClintock

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-6, 5/7/07
          AYES:  Torlakson, Ashburn, Calderon, Corbett, Correa,  
            Florez, Kuehl, Ridley-Thomas, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Aanestad, Battin, Dutton, Runner, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cedillo, Oropeza

           SENATE FLOOR  :  29-7, 5/24/07
          AYES:  Alquist, Ashburn, Calderon, Cedillo, Corbett,  
            Correa, Denham, Ducheny, Kehoe, Kuehl, Machado,  
            Maldonado, Margett, Migden, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza,  
            Padilla, Perata, Ridley-Thomas, Romero, Runner, Scott,  
            Simitian, Steinberg, Torlakson, Vincent, Wiggins, Wyland,  
            Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Cogdill, Cox, Dutton,  
            Hollingsworth, McClintock
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Battin, Florez, Harman, Lowenthal

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR :  Not available


           SUBJECT  :    Vision care:  annuitants:  California State  
          University

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 235
                                                                Page  
          2

           SOURCE  :     California State Employees Association, Retired  
          Division


           DIGEST  :    This bill allows annuitants of the California  
          State University (CSU) system to participate in the newly  
          created California State University Annuitant Vision Care  
          Program for annuitants.  This bill requires the Office of  
          the Chancellor of the CSU to administer the program for all  
          participating annuitants of the institution.

           Assembly Amendments  recast the bill.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law, prior to enactment of AB 2242  
          (Assembly Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security  
          Committee), Chapter 611, Statutes of 2006, provided vision  
          care for active state employees only, not retirees.

          Under regulations and through collective bargaining  
          agreements, the Department of Personnel Administration  
          (DPA) has provided vision care benefits to approximately  
          176,000 active state employees and their dependents since  
          1986.  Until Chapter 611 (2006), vision care benefits were  
          not made available to state retirees.

          Vision care is now available for retired state employees,  
          pursuant to Chapter 611 (2006).  When a state employee  
          currently receiving vision care benefits retires,  
          enrollment in the vision care plan administered by DPA is  
          now permitted to continue if the retiree pays the monthly  
          insurance premium (approximately $12 to $18 per month).

          This bill allows annuitants of the CSU system to  
          participate in the newly created California State  
          University Annuitant Vision Care Program for annuitants.   
          This bill requires the Office of the Chancellor of the CSU  
          to administer the program for all participating annuitants  
          of the institution.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, all  
          costs, including start-up and ongoing expenses associated  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 235
                                                                Page  
          3

          with administering the program, would be included in  
          premiums paid by participating annuitants.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/10/07) (Unable to reverify)

          California State Employees Association, Retired Division  
          (source)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees
          California State Employees Association
          Public Employees' Retirement System
          Retired Public Employees Association

           OPPOSITION  :    (Unable to verify at time of writing)

          California State University (previous version)

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The Public Employees' Retirement  
          System Board of Administration states:

            "This bill would allow annuitants of the California State  
            University (CSU) system to participate in the Vision Care  
            Program for State Annuitants.  The Vision Care Program is  
            under the administration of the Department of Personnel  
            Administration (DPA) and is a voluntary vision care  
            program for state annuitants and their dependents,  
            excluding CSU annuitants.  CSU annuitants are currently  
            only eligible for vision care benefits through their  
            health care provider, not CSU or DPA.

            "The current sate annuitant vision coverage through the  
            Health Maintenance Organization and Preferred Plan Option  
            basic plans are not as comprehensive as the coverage  
            provided to state active members through the Vision  
            Service Plan program.  This bill recognizes the unique  
            needs of the retiree group and would provide retirees and  
            their families the option to enroll into a comprehensive  
            vision care program."

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    CSU states in opposition:

            "[T]his measure would require that those CSU employees  
            who participated in a vision plan prior to retirement be  
            eligible to participate in a retiree vision plan  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 235
                                                                Page  
          4

            equivalent to the active employee plan currently offered  
            by the CSU; but DPA and CSU do not necessarily contract  
            with the same vision vendor, nor do they offer the same  
            level of vision benefits for their employees.
            . . .

            The CSU believes that if it is the intent of the author  
            to allow CSU retirees to receive a retiree-paid vision  
            plan through the CSU, then this measure must be amended  
            to designate the CSU as the plan administrator and  
            adequate funding must be provided to allow for start up  
            planning and administration of this new program.  For  
            example, CSU currently administers the CSU retiree dental  
            plan, currently the one CSU-specific retiree benefit plan  
            in place, as a separate program from other state  
            programs."


          JJA:mw  9/4/07   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****






















                                                           CONTINUED