BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 946
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 946 (Scott)
          As Amended August 14, 2008
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :30-8  
           
           EDUCATION           7-3         HIGHER EDUCATION    7-0         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Mullin, Brownley, Coto,   |Ayes:|Portantino, Horton,       |
          |     |Eng, Hancock, Karnette,   |     |Arambula, Beall, Cook,    |
          |     |Solorio                   |     |Galgiani, Ruskin          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Garrick, Huff, Nakanishi  |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        HIGHER EDUCATION    6-0         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Leno, Caballero, Davis,   |Ayes:|Portantino, Horton,       |
          |     |DeSaulnier, Huffman,      |     |Arambula, Beall, Cook,    |
          |     |Karnette, Krekorian,      |     |Ruskin                    |
          |     |Lieu, Ma, Nava, Solorio,  |     |                          |
          |     |De Leon                   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Walters, Emmerson, La     |     |                          |
          |     |Malfa, Nakanishi, Sharon  |     |                          |
          |     |Runner                    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the individual results of the California  
          Standards Test (CST) and the CST augmented test to be provided  
          to the office of the Chancellor of the California Community  
          Colleges (CCC) and CCC districts so that the Early Assessment  
          Program (EAP), established by the California State University  
          (CSU) in coordination with the State Board of Education (SBE)  
          and the California Department of Education (CDE), may be  
          expanded to include participation by prospective CCC students.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Expresses the intent of the Legislature that the CCC  








                                                                  SB 946
                                                                  Page  2


            Chancellor's office, CSU Chancellor's office, the SBE, and CDE  
            work together to modify the existing EAP to expand it to  
            include CCC so that beginning in the 2009-10 school year, high  
            school juniors who are considering attending either system can  
            take the EAP and receive information in the summer before  
            their senior year concerning their preparation for  
            college-level work at both CSU and CCC.

          2)Requires the CCC Chancellor's office to coordinate with CCC  
            districts that choose to voluntarily participate in the EAP;  
            accomplishes specified goals, to the extent possible; provides  
            a report to the Legislature and the Governor by February 15,  
            2015, on the implementation and results of the EAP for CCC  
            students; and releases the individual results of the CST and  
            the augmented CST to participating CCC districts upon their  
            request for this information, which may be used to provide  
            diagnostic advice to prospective CCC students participating in  
            the EAP.; accomplishes all of the following activities using  
            existing resources:

          3)Requires CCC districts that choose to work directly with high  
            school pupils within their respective district boundaries who  
            took the augmented CST, do the following:

             a)   Use same standards utilized by CSU to assess readiness; 

             b)   Use the augmented CST, currently utilized by CSU for  
               purposes of early assessment, to assess the college  
               readiness of pupils in the EAP;

             c)   Consider consulting with the CCC Academic Senate to work  
               toward sequencing their pre-collegiate level courses and  
               transfer-level courses in English and mathematics to the  
               elementary and secondary education content standards;

             d)   Identify an EAP coordinator and coordinate with CSU  
               campuses and schools offering instruction in kindergarten  
               through grade 12 in their respective district boundaries on  
               EAP-related activities that assist pupils in making  
               decisions that increase their college readiness skills and  
               likelihood of pursuing a postsecondary education;

             e)   Use individual CST and augmented CST test results  
               provided to that college to provide diagnostic advice to  








                                                                 SB 946
                                                                  Page  3


               prospective CCC students participating in the EAP; and,

             f)   Utilize the existing infrastructure of academic  
               opportunities, as developed by CSU, to provide additional  
               preparation in grade 12 for prospective CCC students  
               participating in the EAP.

          4)Provides that the individual results of the CST and the  
            augmented CST shall be released to and may be used by CSU to  
            provide diagnostic advice to prospective CSU students  
            participating in the EAP and that the individual results of  
            the augmented CST shall not be used by CSU as a criterion for  
            admission.

          5)Prohibits CCC from using the individual results of the  
            augmented CST as a criterion for admission. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Potential redirection of existing resources for  
          districts who volunteer to participate in the EAP.  Ongoing  
          General Fund costs of around $50,000 to the CCC Chancellor's  
          Office for one-half position to administer the EAP.

           COMMENTS  :  Recent studies indicate a significant number of  
          incoming CCC students are unprepared to undertake basic math and  
          English coursework-in fact, one out of three CCC students  
          enrolls in a basic skills class.  A recent survey by the CCC  
          Research and Planning Group indicated that over 70% of students  
          who took a CCC placement test require remedial math while 42%  
          require remedial English.  These statistics have serious  
          repercussions on a student's educational path: those who lack  
          basic skills are less likely to receive a degree or transfer to  
          a university. 

          Unlike CSU and the University of California, CCC does not have a  
          single English or math proficiency exam upon enrollment at a  
          CCC.  Each of the 109 campuses determines for itself the type of  
          placement tests to use.  However, the CCC Board of Governors  
          recently directed the Chancellor to begin a consultation process  
          to evaluate implementation of system wide student assessment  
          measures.

          Modeled on successful CSU program:  Under the EAP, initiated by  
          CSU in coordination with CDE and SBE in 2004, 11th graders  
          taking the CST are encouraged to take an "augmented version" of  








                                                                  SB 946
                                                                  Page  4


          the test, comprised of 15 additional English language arts  
          questions, an essay, and 15 additional math questions.  The  
          results of the augmented tests, once scored, indicate a  
          student's "readiness" for college-level English and math.  Those  
          considered proficient on the augmented CST tests are not  
          required to take the English and/or math placement tests upon  
          admission to CSU.  Those whose scores indicate they are not  
          ready are encouraged to take classes during their senior year to  
          improve and strengthen their skills and/or work independently on  
          CSU's English and math success Internet Web sites.  In  
          coordination with CDE and SBE, CSU developed new courses that  
          seniors can take in high school during their senior year and  
          provides professional development to K-12 teachers.  

          The goal of the EAP is to have high school graduates enter CSU  
          fully-prepared to do college-level work and reduce the more than  
          60% of the nearly 40,000 first-time freshmen admitted to CSU who  
          require remedial education in English, math or both.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Sandra Fried / HIGHER ED. / (916)  
          319-3960 


                                                                FN: 0007317