BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1022|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |Version:                 |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1022
          Author:   Steinberg (D)
          Amended:  8/22/08
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  3-1, 4/10/07
          AYES:  Romero, Cedillo, Ridley-Thomas
          NOES:  Cogdill
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Margett

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  10-6, 5/31/07
          AYES:  Torlakson, Cedillo, Corbett, Florez, Kuehl, Oropeza,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Simitian, Steinberg, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Aanestad, Ashburn, Dutton, Runner, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Battin

           SENATE FLOOR  :  22-11, 6/6/07
          AYES:  Alquist, Calderon, Corbett, Florez, Kehoe, Kuehl,  
            Lowenthal, Machado, McClintock, Migden, Negrete McLeod,  
            Oropeza, Padilla, Perata, Ridley-Thomas, Romero, Scott,  
            Steinberg, Torlakson, Vincent, Wiggins, Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Cogdill, Cox, Denham, Dutton,  
            Harman, Hollingsworth, Maldonado, Runner, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Ashburn, Battin, Cedillo, Correa,  
            Ducheny, Margett, Simitian

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  41-31, 8/25/08 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Child abuse:  central index:  minors

           SOURCE  :     Childrens Law Center of Los Angeles 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1022
                                                                Page  
          2

                      County Welfare Directors Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Department of Justice  
          (DOJ) to remove information relating to a person whos name  
          is listed in the Child Abuse Central Index as a suspect in  
          a child abuse or neglect investigation due to an incident  
          that occurred when the person was under 18 years of age if  
          the incident did not result in a delinquency adjudication  
          or criminal conviction, and he/she makes a notarized  
          written request to DOJ to have his/her name removed as a  
          suspect with respect to that incident, as specified.  This  
          bill, in addition, requires DOJ to notify the current  
          caregiver, the parents or legal guardian, the attorney, and  
          the guardian ad litem of a minor if the minor is the  
          suspected abuser.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) required information in cases in  
          which the child abuser was a minor to delete that  
          information after five years if no subsequent reports are  
          received on that individual during that five-year period of  
          time with specified exceptions, and (2) added  
          double-jointing language.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law establishes the Child Abuse and  
          Neglect Reporting Act (CANRA), which generally is intended  
          to protect children from abuse and neglect.  [Section 11164  
          of the Penal Code (PEN)]

          Existing law requires DOJ to "maintain an index of all  
          reports of child abuse and severe neglect" submitted  
          pursuant to the mandatory reporting laws.  The index shall  
          be continually updated by DOJ and shall not contain any  
          reports that are determined to be unfounded.  [PEN Section  
          11170(a)(1)]

          Existing law provides that DOJ "shall act only as a  
          repository of reports of suspected child abuse and severe  
          neglect to be maintained in the Child Abuse Central Index?  
          The submitting agencies are responsible for the accuracy,  
          completeness, and retention of the reports described in  
          this section.  The department shall be responsible for  
          ensuring that the Child Abuse Central Index accurately  
          reflects the report it receives from the submitting  







                                                               SB 1022
                                                                Page  
          3

          agency."  [PEN Section 11170(a)(2)]

          Existing law applies the following definitions for purposes  
          of CANRA and the Child Abuse Central Index (CACI):

          1. "Unfounded report" means a report that is determined by  
             the investigator who conducted the investigation to be  
             false, to be inherently improbable, to involve an  
             accidental injury, or not to constitute child abuse or  
             neglect, as defined in PEN Section 11165.6.

          2. "Substantiated report" means a report that is determined  
             by the investigator who conducted the investigation to  
             constitute child abuse or neglect, as defined in PEN  
             Section 11165.6, based upon evidence that makes it more  
             likely than not that child abuse or neglect, as defined,  
             occurred.

          3. "Inconclusive report" means a report that is determined  
             by the investigator who conducted the investigation not  
             to be unfounded, but the findings are inconclusive and  
             there is insufficient evidence to determine whether  
             child abuse or neglect, as defined in PEN Section  
             11165.6, has occurred.  [PEN Section 11165.12]

          Existing law requires specified law enforcement agencies to  
          forward to DOJ a report in writing of every case it  
          investigates of known or suspected child abuse or severe  
          neglect which is determined not to be unfounded, as  
          specified.  An agency shall not forward a report to DOJ  
          unless it has conducted an active investigation and  
          determined that the report is not unfounded.  If a report  
          has previously been filed which subsequently proves to be  
          unfounded, DOJ shall be notified in writing of that fact  
          and shall not retain the report.  [PEN Section 11169(a)]

          Existing law requires that information from an inconclusive  
          or unsubstantiated report be deleted from CACI after 10  
          years if no subsequent report concerning the same suspected  
          child abuser is received within that time period.  [PEN  
          11170(a)(3)]

          Existing law provides that "(i)f a person is listed in the  
          Child Abuse Central Index only as a victim of child abuse  







                                                               SB 1022
                                                                Page  
          4

          or neglect, and that person is 18 years of age or older,  
          that person may have his or her name removed from the index  
          by making a written request to the Department of Justice.   
          The request shall be notarized and include the person's  
          name, address, social security number, and date of birth."   
          [PEN Section 11170(f)]

          This bill provides, in addition, that if "a person is  
          listed in the Child Abuse Central Index as a suspect in a  
          child abuse or neglect investigation due to an incident  
          that occurred when the person was under the age of 18 years  
          , and the incident did not result in a delinquency  
          adjudication or criminal conviction, that person may make a  
          written request to DOJ to have his/her name removed from  
          the index as a suspect with respect to that incident.  The  
          request shall be notarized and include the person's name,  
          address, social security number, and date of birth.  Upon  
          receipt of the request, DOJ shall inquire of the submitting  
          agency whether the incident resulted in a delinquency  
          adjudication or criminal conviction.  Unless the submitting  
          agency responds to DOJ in the affirmative within 30 days,  
          DOJ shall remove the person's name from the index as the  
          person suspected in that incident.

          If a person is listed in the index as a suspect with  
          respect to more than one reported incident, the process set  
          forth above shall be followed with respect to each incident  
          for which the person wishes to have his/her name removed  
          from the index.
                      
          Existing law requires specified law enforcement agencies  
          who forward a report in writing to DOJ to also notify in  
          writing the known or suspected child abuser that he/she has  
          been reported to the CACI.  [PEN Section 11169(b)]

          This bill provides that, if the known or suspected child  
          abuser is a minor, the agency shall notify the minor's  
          current caregiver, the minor's parents or legal guardian,  
          the minor's attorney, and the minor's guardian ad litem, if  
          any.   

          Existing law also requires DOJ to delete information from  
          an inconclusive or unsubstantiated child abuse report after  
          10 years if no subsequent report concerning the same  







                                                               SB 1022
                                                                Page  
          5

          suspected child abuser is received within that time period.

          This bill requires, in cases in which the suspected child  
          abuser was a minor at the time of the report, the  
          information to be deleted after five years if no subsequent  
          report concerning the same suspected child abuser is  
          received within that time period.  The bill further  
          specifies that if a subsequent report is received within  
          the 10-year period for adult child abuse suspects or  
          five-year period for child abuse suspects who were  
          themselves minors at the time of the report, information  
          from any prior report, as well as any subsequently filed  
          report, shall be maintained for 10 years from the time of  
          the most recent report.

          Existing law also mandates that specified persons forward  
          reports of suspected child abuse to DOJ and requires DOJ to  
          notify the suspected abuser that he or she has been  
          reported to the CACI.

          This bill additionally requires DOJ, if the known or  
          suspected child abuser is a minor, to notify the minor's  
          current caregiver, parents or legal guardian, attorney, and  
          guardian ad litem.

          This bill incorporates additional changes in Section 11170  
          of the Penal Code proposed by AB 2618 (Solorio) and AB 2651  
          (Aghazarian) that will become operative if one or both of  
          those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before  
          January 1, 2009, and this bill is chaptered last.

           Similar legislation  .  This bill is double-jointed with AB  
          2618 (Solorio) and AB 2651 (Aghazarian).

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

             Major Provisions                2007-08     2008-09     
             2009-10               Fund  








                                                               SB 1022
                                                                Page  
          6

            CACI review         $38       $75       $75        
            General

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/25/08)

          Children's Law Center of Los Angeles (co-source)
          County Welfare Director's Association (co-source)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          California Public Defenders Association
          Conference of Delegates of California Bar Association
          Prevent Child Abuse California 
          Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/25/08)

          California District Attorneys Association
          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author has provided the  
          following statement concerning the need for this bill:

            "Minors are sometimes listed on the statewide Child Abuse  
            Central Index ('CACI') as perpetrators of 'sexual abuse,'  
            due to a report of sexual behavior between the child and  
            another child.  Abused and neglected children in foster  
            care are especially likely to end up being listed as  
            perpetrators on the CACI.  Often the listing of the child  
            occurs without any effective notice to the child, the  
            parents or caregivers, or the child's attorney if the  
            child has one.  Children are listed on the CACI even in  
            cases where no criminal or delinquency charges are filed,  
            solely on the basis of an investigation concluding that  
            the allegation of 'sexual abuse' is either substantiated  
            or inconclusive.  In light of the tremendous implications  
            a CACI listing can have for the child's future, greater  
            protections are needed."

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The California District  
          Attorneys Association states:

            "The Department of Justice maintains the Child Abuse  
            Central Index, which contains reports of suspected child  
            abuse pursuant to Penal Code Section 11170.  Under  







                                                               SB 1022
                                                                Page  
          7

            existing law, if a report is unfounded, it will not be  
            included in the index.  Further, if a report is deemed  
            inconclusive or unsubstantiated, it is deleted from the  
            index after ten years if there are no subsequent reports  
            concerning the same suspect.  Information from the index  
            is made known to law enforcement, probation and county  
            welfare departments when there is an ongoing child abuse  
            investigation.  The information is also available to  
            county licensing agencies concerning those who are  
            seeking employment for a position that gives them  
            supervisory or disciplinary power over children.

            "There are many reasons why a juvenile is the suspected  
            perpetrator's abuse of a child may not result in a true  
            finding or conviction.  It might be the case that the  
            victim wasn't cooperative or was too young to cooperate.   
            Perhaps there was a criminal trial that resulted in a  
            hung jury.  It would still be important to maintain these  
            suspects in the index if, for example, the suspect later  
            seeks employment in a daycare center or residential  
            facility.  Additionally, if the individual were to be  
            accused of a similar crime, the information would be  
            valuable as potential propensity evidence in the current  
            case.  If an investigation revealed the report was  
            inconclusive or unsubstantiated, the suspect's name will  
            automatically be deleted after ten years pursuant to  
            existing law.  If a report was unfounded, it would not be  
            in the index in the first place." 
           

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Arambula, Beall, Berg, Brownley, Caballero, Charles  
            Calderon, Carter, Coto, De La Torre, DeSaulnier, Dymally,  
            Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fuentes, Furutani, Hancock, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Huffman, Jones, Karnette, Krekorian, Leno,  
            Levine, Lieber, Lieu, Mendoza, Mullin, Nava, Nunez,  
            Parra, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas, Solorio,  
            Swanson, Torrico, Wolk, Bass
          NOES:  Adams, Aghazarian, Anderson, Benoit, Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Fuller,  
            Gaines, Galgiani, Garcia, Garrick, Horton, Houston, Huff,  
            Jeffries, Keene, La Malfa, Nakanishi, Niello, Plescia,  
            Sharon Runner, Silva, Smyth, Spitzer, Strickland,  
            Villines, Walters







                                                               SB 1022
                                                                Page  
          8

          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Davis, De Leon, Laird, Ma, Maze,  
            Saldana, Soto, Tran


          RJG:mw  8/26/08   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED










                                ****  END  ****